Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE
Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE
Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.1 <strong>Through</strong>-<strong>Wall</strong> TOA Estimation 55<br />
X[m]<br />
Front wall<br />
1.9 m<br />
Metal plate<br />
4.9 m<br />
Rear wall<br />
Z[m]<br />
X[m]<br />
Front wall<br />
1.7 m<br />
Metal plate<br />
4.7 m<br />
a) b)<br />
Rear wall<br />
Fig. 4.1.11: Migrated images - Scenario 1. a) Conventional method without wall<br />
compensation. b) Proposed method with precise TOA estimation.<br />
wall is in the correct position only in Fig. 4.1.11 b), approximately at 4.7 m in Z<br />
direction, in Fig. 4.1.11 a) it starts at 4.9 m.<br />
Scenario 2 demonstrates how important true T OA estimation is in case the<br />
objects are not in parallel with the scanning direction. The wall compensation<br />
can be done also in much simpler way. An additional delay for a wave penetrating<br />
perpendicularly to the wall can be computed by (2.5.8) as we described in Section<br />
2.5.3 and used for wall compensation [86]. This approach could be used only in<br />
case the waves are penetrating perpendicularly to the wall, what is not fulfilled in<br />
praxis. Compensation by this simple approach still provides much better results<br />
than without compensating the wall at all. However, it is not as precise as the<br />
compensation by the proposed method, as is shown in this second scenario (Fig.<br />
4.1.12). The metal plate of size 0.67 m × 0.75 m was placed aslant behind the 0.4<br />
m thick brick wall with relative permittivity approximately εrw = 3.4. As it can<br />
be seen in Fig. 4.1.13, even if the waves penetrate aslant in the wall, the proposed<br />
method provides correct coordinations of the left-bottom metal plate corner [X =<br />
1.6 m, Z = 1 m], unlike the simple method for compensation [X = 1.73 m, Z = 1<br />
m].<br />
A noncompensation of the wall will cause that the objects will not be imaged<br />
in correct position. The image will be unfocused as well [141], however, in real<br />
measurements only the shifting of the objects to the incorrect positions is evident.<br />
Z[m]