18.01.2013 Views

Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE

Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE

Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.1 <strong>Through</strong>-<strong>Wall</strong> TOA Estimation 55<br />

X[m]<br />

Front wall<br />

1.9 m<br />

Metal plate<br />

4.9 m<br />

Rear wall<br />

Z[m]<br />

X[m]<br />

Front wall<br />

1.7 m<br />

Metal plate<br />

4.7 m<br />

a) b)<br />

Rear wall<br />

Fig. 4.1.11: Migrated images - Scenario 1. a) Conventional method without wall<br />

compensation. b) Proposed method with precise TOA estimation.<br />

wall is in the correct position only in Fig. 4.1.11 b), approximately at 4.7 m in Z<br />

direction, in Fig. 4.1.11 a) it starts at 4.9 m.<br />

Scenario 2 demonstrates how important true T OA estimation is in case the<br />

objects are not in parallel with the scanning direction. The wall compensation<br />

can be done also in much simpler way. An additional delay for a wave penetrating<br />

perpendicularly to the wall can be computed by (2.5.8) as we described in Section<br />

2.5.3 and used for wall compensation [86]. This approach could be used only in<br />

case the waves are penetrating perpendicularly to the wall, what is not fulfilled in<br />

praxis. Compensation by this simple approach still provides much better results<br />

than without compensating the wall at all. However, it is not as precise as the<br />

compensation by the proposed method, as is shown in this second scenario (Fig.<br />

4.1.12). The metal plate of size 0.67 m × 0.75 m was placed aslant behind the 0.4<br />

m thick brick wall with relative permittivity approximately εrw = 3.4. As it can<br />

be seen in Fig. 4.1.13, even if the waves penetrate aslant in the wall, the proposed<br />

method provides correct coordinations of the left-bottom metal plate corner [X =<br />

1.6 m, Z = 1 m], unlike the simple method for compensation [X = 1.73 m, Z = 1<br />

m].<br />

A noncompensation of the wall will cause that the objects will not be imaged<br />

in correct position. The image will be unfocused as well [141], however, in real<br />

measurements only the shifting of the objects to the incorrect positions is evident.<br />

Z[m]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!