18.01.2013 Views

Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE

Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE

Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2 Measurements of the <strong>Wall</strong> Parameters by Reflectometry 58<br />

4.2.2 Model of the Wave Propagation in the <strong>Wall</strong><br />

The main idea of the wall parameter estimation is to use time domain reflectometry.<br />

The Fresnel equations at the wall interfaces and plane wave propagation within<br />

the wall are applied. This idea was firstly introduced in [155]. However, here a<br />

time consuming iterative error minimization process that solves inverse problem<br />

for multilayer medium has to be processed. In addition, as a multiple reflection<br />

reduction technique a low effective time gating was chosen. Therefore, a wall<br />

with thickness only 12 cm was measured to prove the method’s functioning. A<br />

time domain reflectometry was chosen for wall parameter estimation also in [119].<br />

However, the piece of wall has to be placed in anechoic chamber room and measured<br />

with and without a metal plate behind it, what can not be done in a dangerous<br />

environment. The reflectometry principle was also used in [80]. However, only the<br />

theoretical approach was tested there on simulated data and an extensive iteration<br />

algorithm was used to estimate the wanted parameters. Furthermore, the whole<br />

wave propagation was assumed to be planar. This is not practical since it requires<br />

a large distance between the wall and the radar device.<br />

Our approach permits spherical wave propagation. But within the wall we<br />

also simplify to planar waves in order to keep simple. An error made by that<br />

approximation is negligible since it only neglects the spreading losses in the wall.<br />

That is, the conductivity would be slightly overestimated. For our wall model, we<br />

suppose, as in [155] and [80], a flat wall surface, a homogeneous wall structure, and<br />

normal incidence of the sounding waves. Frequency independent wall permittivity<br />

εw and wall conductivity σw are also supposed. Moreover, it can be assumed that<br />

the relative permeability of common wall material will be µrw = 1 and the wave<br />

attenuation would not be extremely strong at the applied radar frequencies.<br />

Fig. 4.2.1 illustrates the wave propagation within a wall. Obviously, we have<br />

to deal with the reflections in both wall surfaces and the wave propagation within<br />

the wall. As demonstrated below, the reflections depicted in blue would be used<br />

to determine the wall parameters and the transmitted wave (green line) should<br />

sound the targets behind the wall. Reflections of higher order are not of interest<br />

(depicted as green dotted lines). Their amplitudes are negligible.<br />

Fresnel’s equations give ratios between the incident wave and the scattered<br />

respectively transmitted electrical field at a flat boundary for normal incident<br />

waves:<br />

√<br />

εa −<br />

Γ = ±<br />

√ εw<br />

√<br />

εa + √ ,<br />

εw<br />

T = 2 4√ εaεw<br />

√<br />

εa + √ =<br />

εw<br />

√ 1 − Γ2 (4.2.1)<br />

where Γ is a reflection coefficient, T is a transmission coefficient, and εa is the<br />

permittivity of the air or vacuum. The positive sign in Γ holds for the propagation<br />

air to a wall and the negative sign has be to applied if the wave moves from a wall<br />

to the air.<br />

The wave propagation within the wall is characterized by the propagation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!