18.01.2013 Views

Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE

Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE

Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.5 <strong>Radar</strong> <strong>Imaging</strong> Methods Overview 38<br />

Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3<br />

Fig. 2.5.7: An example of factorisation (upper side) and the resultant hierarchy of<br />

data-sets (lower side).<br />

2.5.13 Migrations with Antenna Beam Compensation<br />

Kun Liu et al. [90] in 2002 made a research how the consideration of antenna angle<br />

beam would change computations and results in wave equation based algorithms<br />

such as Kirchhoff migration and f-k migration. They called it the effects of diplimited<br />

Kirchhoff migration and f-k migration. In praxis most measurements are<br />

done with wide beam antennas. However, not with omni-directional, but with<br />

some specific antenna flaring angel beam, that can be precisely measured. The<br />

waves that are aslant to the antennas have lower transmitted or received amplitudes.<br />

Taking into account this fact in computations some improvements can be<br />

done in the resulting image. It also decreases the computational cost in Kirchhoff<br />

migration or suppress noise in both Kirchhoff and f-k migration [90]. Dip-limited<br />

f-k migration is common f-k migration with an embedded dip filter. The diplimited<br />

Kirchhoff migration is implemented by limiting the aperture of migration<br />

operators. The dip-limited Kirchhoff migration generates additional artifacts when<br />

the dip limit is less than the maximum dip on the desired output section. These<br />

artifacts are caused by the endpoints of the migration operators and become more<br />

obvious as the dip limit is decreased. A geometric explanation as well as a synthetic<br />

experiment are described in [90]. <strong>With</strong> the same idea, however, much more<br />

from mathematical point of view Murthy N. Guddati et al. [65] came in 2005.<br />

2.5.14 Conclusion<br />

The migrations are formally divided into two main groups. Backprojection involves<br />

migration based on simple geometrical approach, whereas Backpropagation represents<br />

migrations based on wave equations. Hence, the backpropagation migrations<br />

should provide better results from physical point of view.<br />

SAR imaging, Kirchhoff migration, and Stolt migration are most often used<br />

migrations. SAR imaging and Kirchhoff migrations have almost the same compu-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!