Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE
Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE
Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.1 <strong>Through</strong>-<strong>Wall</strong> TOA Estimation 49<br />
Z<br />
<strong>Wall</strong><br />
� rw = 8<br />
Antenna<br />
d = ?<br />
H X = 3 m<br />
W di = 0.5 m<br />
D w = 0.5 m<br />
X<br />
H Z = 1.5 m<br />
Fig. 4.1.4: Simulated scenario of object behind the wall.<br />
Table 4.2: Dependence of d on number of iterations. dinit ≈ � εa HXDW<br />
εw HZ<br />
Iterations 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />
d[cm] 35.355 20.828 17.857 17.674 17.673 17.673 17.673 17.673<br />
Errd[%] 100.051 17.852 1.041 0.006 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />
The computation complexity of TOA estimation is a very important aspect,<br />
e.g. in order to compute migration from SAR scanning consisting from N = 300<br />
scans and with final image resolution Nx = 500 × Nz = 500 pixels, the parameter<br />
d has to be computed Nc = 150 millions times.<br />
Nc = NxNzN. (4.1.13)<br />
The computation method of dinit should be therefore chosen with sophisticated<br />
trade-off between precision and complexity, and with regard to the hardware performance.<br />
In Table 4.3 precisions of several TOA methods are compared. Firstly, the TOA<br />
is computed as a straight line between the antenna and the target according to the<br />
(2.5.1) (one way antenna - target only) with no wall compensation. Secondly, a<br />
simple wall compensation method (Section 2.5.3) is used to compute TOA. Finally,<br />
the TOA is computed according to the proposed precise method. ErrT OA[%]<br />
represents a relative error of TOA estimation in percentage.<br />
The shown precision is obtained only in case of homogeneous walls. In addition,<br />
the velocity of the wave propagation depends also on conductivity, permeability,