Download - Facultatea de Științe Socio-Umane - Universitatea ...
Download - Facultatea de Științe Socio-Umane - Universitatea ...
Download - Facultatea de Științe Socio-Umane - Universitatea ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
160<br />
Silviu OŢA, Liana OŢA<br />
The fortress was built of stone, on the top of a hill known as Grad (Pl. 1.1). It is<br />
bor<strong>de</strong>red on three si<strong>de</strong>s by an abyss (two hundred meters <strong>de</strong>ep). The only way of<br />
access is from the foot of the hill, and two parallel <strong>de</strong>fense ditches were dug on it. In<br />
the part from the mo<strong>de</strong>rn village was left a small way of access on the brink of the<br />
abyss, the wall between the two ditches being interrupted. A small plateau of<br />
limestone (Pl. 1.2), difficult of access, is situated on the top of the hill, in front of the<br />
ditches.<br />
The stage of research<br />
Until now, we have a small amount of information about the fortress of Caraşova.<br />
Due to some reasons (more or less objective), there are, in the archaeological and<br />
historical literature, some mistakes, because, in particular, the wrong interpretation of<br />
the written documents.<br />
Historians' interest focused on the fortress of Caraşova by the end of the 19 th<br />
century. A special work <strong>de</strong>dicated to the fortress was not written, but some excerpts<br />
from monographs of different counties or other kind of studies were published. The<br />
main paper about mediaeval Caraş County belongs to Frígyes Pesty, who started to<br />
publish it since 1882 1 , during the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. The same historian<br />
offered us a correct list of the chatelaines 2 of the fortress from 1323 up until 1364. As<br />
for the others enumerated by Pesty, they are only supposed to have really existed.<br />
Pesty consi<strong>de</strong>rs the first mention of the fortress dating back to 1230.<br />
Starting from Pesty's opinion, almost all the historians and archaeologists who<br />
studied the fortifications from Banat (J. Szentkláray, Traian Simu, V. Tufescu,<br />
Coriolan Suciu, Theodor N. Trâpcea, Ştefan Matei, Theodor O. Gheorghiu 3 and<br />
Ştefan Pascu) continued the make the same mistake. The absence of archaeological<br />
excavations or of a correct topographical survey (Pl. 2) influenced the opinions about<br />
Caraşova. We shall not insist further on this subject, because some papers are already<br />
published 4 .<br />
Adrian A. Rusu 5 is the first historian who published a list of the chatelaines from<br />
the 13 th -14 th centuries, and between them he mentions those from Caraşova, too.<br />
Unlike the other historians, Rusu took into consi<strong>de</strong>ration only the direct documentary<br />
mentions (more precisely the chatelaines attested in the 14 th century), and thus<br />
avoi<strong>de</strong>d the speculations (the so-called mentions of the fortress from the 13 th century).<br />
It was Györffy György, who, in 1987, clarified the historical situation of Caraşova<br />
fortress in the 13 th -14 th centuries. His opinion was adopted by D. Ţeicu, too.<br />
According to Györffy, two fortifications, with a similar name, are situated on the<br />
* National Museum of History, Bucharest, Romania, silviuota@yahoo.com.<br />
**Institute of Archaeology „Vasile Pârvan”, Bucharest, loredanaota@yahoo.com.<br />
1<br />
Pesty 1882-Vol.III, 1883-Vol.IV, 1884-Vol.II/1, 1885-Vol.II/2.<br />
2<br />
Pesty 1884, p. 165.<br />
3<br />
Gheorghiu 1985, p. 42, 69, 225.<br />
4<br />
Oţa, Oţa 2006, p. 3-13; Oţa, Oţa 2008, p. 183-221; Oţa, Oţa 2009, p. 193-201.<br />
5 Rusu 1979, p. 71-98.