24.01.2013 Views

Download - Facultatea de Științe Socio-Umane - Universitatea ...

Download - Facultatea de Științe Socio-Umane - Universitatea ...

Download - Facultatea de Științe Socio-Umane - Universitatea ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

160<br />

Silviu OŢA, Liana OŢA<br />

The fortress was built of stone, on the top of a hill known as Grad (Pl. 1.1). It is<br />

bor<strong>de</strong>red on three si<strong>de</strong>s by an abyss (two hundred meters <strong>de</strong>ep). The only way of<br />

access is from the foot of the hill, and two parallel <strong>de</strong>fense ditches were dug on it. In<br />

the part from the mo<strong>de</strong>rn village was left a small way of access on the brink of the<br />

abyss, the wall between the two ditches being interrupted. A small plateau of<br />

limestone (Pl. 1.2), difficult of access, is situated on the top of the hill, in front of the<br />

ditches.<br />

The stage of research<br />

Until now, we have a small amount of information about the fortress of Caraşova.<br />

Due to some reasons (more or less objective), there are, in the archaeological and<br />

historical literature, some mistakes, because, in particular, the wrong interpretation of<br />

the written documents.<br />

Historians' interest focused on the fortress of Caraşova by the end of the 19 th<br />

century. A special work <strong>de</strong>dicated to the fortress was not written, but some excerpts<br />

from monographs of different counties or other kind of studies were published. The<br />

main paper about mediaeval Caraş County belongs to Frígyes Pesty, who started to<br />

publish it since 1882 1 , during the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. The same historian<br />

offered us a correct list of the chatelaines 2 of the fortress from 1323 up until 1364. As<br />

for the others enumerated by Pesty, they are only supposed to have really existed.<br />

Pesty consi<strong>de</strong>rs the first mention of the fortress dating back to 1230.<br />

Starting from Pesty's opinion, almost all the historians and archaeologists who<br />

studied the fortifications from Banat (J. Szentkláray, Traian Simu, V. Tufescu,<br />

Coriolan Suciu, Theodor N. Trâpcea, Ştefan Matei, Theodor O. Gheorghiu 3 and<br />

Ştefan Pascu) continued the make the same mistake. The absence of archaeological<br />

excavations or of a correct topographical survey (Pl. 2) influenced the opinions about<br />

Caraşova. We shall not insist further on this subject, because some papers are already<br />

published 4 .<br />

Adrian A. Rusu 5 is the first historian who published a list of the chatelaines from<br />

the 13 th -14 th centuries, and between them he mentions those from Caraşova, too.<br />

Unlike the other historians, Rusu took into consi<strong>de</strong>ration only the direct documentary<br />

mentions (more precisely the chatelaines attested in the 14 th century), and thus<br />

avoi<strong>de</strong>d the speculations (the so-called mentions of the fortress from the 13 th century).<br />

It was Györffy György, who, in 1987, clarified the historical situation of Caraşova<br />

fortress in the 13 th -14 th centuries. His opinion was adopted by D. Ţeicu, too.<br />

According to Györffy, two fortifications, with a similar name, are situated on the<br />

* National Museum of History, Bucharest, Romania, silviuota@yahoo.com.<br />

**Institute of Archaeology „Vasile Pârvan”, Bucharest, loredanaota@yahoo.com.<br />

1<br />

Pesty 1882-Vol.III, 1883-Vol.IV, 1884-Vol.II/1, 1885-Vol.II/2.<br />

2<br />

Pesty 1884, p. 165.<br />

3<br />

Gheorghiu 1985, p. 42, 69, 225.<br />

4<br />

Oţa, Oţa 2006, p. 3-13; Oţa, Oţa 2008, p. 183-221; Oţa, Oţa 2009, p. 193-201.<br />

5 Rusu 1979, p. 71-98.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!