Download - Facultatea de Științe Socio-Umane - Universitatea ...
Download - Facultatea de Științe Socio-Umane - Universitatea ...
Download - Facultatea de Științe Socio-Umane - Universitatea ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
From Every Si<strong>de</strong> Armed with a Cross Sign. A Crusa<strong>de</strong>r’s (?) Sword from …<br />
but it also meant a consi<strong>de</strong>rable prestige and forgiveness of all sins 15 . Crusa<strong>de</strong>rs<br />
treated weapons that they used during the crusa<strong>de</strong> as a testimony of taking the cross to<br />
Jerusalem. Later on, such weapons became important family heirlooms which proved<br />
truly knightly family praise. The case of Jean d’Alluye <strong>de</strong>monstrates the importance<br />
of this testimony for crusa<strong>de</strong>rs. He or<strong>de</strong>red that after his <strong>de</strong>ath a sword that he used or<br />
brought from crusa<strong>de</strong> be <strong>de</strong>picted on his stone effigy. The hilt of his sword, as said by<br />
H. Nickel, has a compact guard and a trilobate pommel totally different from the<br />
fairly standardized cruciform hilts in use in Western Europe. The pommel has a<br />
central bulbous element emerging between two outward-turning scrolls and the<br />
quillon has sharply sloping shoul<strong>de</strong>rs ending in tiny upward-curling finials 16 (Fig. 1:<br />
4). It is probably of Chinese origin, maybe the chên type 17 .<br />
We also knew examples of swords which are regar<strong>de</strong>d as having been given as a<br />
remembrance of taking part in Baltic Crusa<strong>de</strong>s. It is worth mentioning the sword<br />
found in Santok, which was ornamented with the <strong>de</strong>piction of advancing mounted<br />
knights, which can symbolise a crusa<strong>de</strong>. One of two triangular shields ornamenting<br />
the sword’s bla<strong>de</strong> had the image of a lion, and there is a cross potent on the other si<strong>de</strong><br />
of the bla<strong>de</strong> (Fig. 1: 1). This sword probably belonged to Ottokar II of Bohemia<br />
(1233-1278) and may been given to him by the Teutonic Knights in remembrance of<br />
his participation in the Baltic crusa<strong>de</strong>s in 1255 and 1267 18 . P. Bohm 19 relates this<br />
sword to the royal participation in the campaign at the first date, while M. Głosek 20<br />
says that the sword was manufactured after 1267. There is also a sword from the<br />
collection of the Deutsches Historisches Museum. Its heraldic program (a shield with<br />
a climbing lion and a shield with a cross potent) 21 inclined M. Głosek 22 to connect this<br />
sword with the crusa<strong>de</strong>s. This specimen has been related to John the Blind of<br />
Bohemia (1296-1346) who went on crusa<strong>de</strong>s un<strong>de</strong>rtaken by the Teutonic Knights<br />
against pagan Lithuania in 1328/1329, 1336 and again in 1345 23 . A. R. Chodyński 24<br />
connects two other sword parts (from the River Pregoła 25 and Frombork 26 ), <strong>de</strong>corated<br />
with a coat of arms with an eagle and a lion on the pommel with participation of<br />
15 Chronicler Guibert of Nogent wrote: God was now offering knights a fitting means of salvation that<br />
did not require them to abandon their way of life or to don the monk’s habit: the holy war (Flori 1998).<br />
16 Nickel 1991.<br />
17 D. Nicolle suggests that it can be a Middle Eastern or Spanish-Muslim form of a light sword (Nicolle<br />
1995, p. 290).<br />
18 Seger 1912; Brackmann, Unverzagt 1936, Fig. 39; Knap 2009.<br />
19 Bohm 1924.<br />
20 Głosek 1973, p. 56-57.<br />
21 Müller, Kölling 1981, cat. 21.<br />
22 Głosek 1984, p. 80.<br />
23 Iwańczak 2002.<br />
24 Chodyński 2008, pp. 104.<br />
25 Most scholars connect this sword with Conrad of Thuringia, Landgrave of Thuringia and the Grand<br />
Master of the Teutonic Knights (died 1240) (Müller, Kölling 1981, p. 362, cat. 9; Oakeshott 1991, p.<br />
94; Chodyński 2008, p. 104). M. Głosek thought that it had belonged to Władysław of Opole, Jobst of<br />
Moravia or Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (Głosek 1973, p. 152, cat. 198).<br />
26 Chodyński 2003, p. 29; Chodyński 2008, p. 106, il. 6.<br />
55