24.01.2013 Views

Download - Facultatea de Științe Socio-Umane - Universitatea ...

Download - Facultatea de Științe Socio-Umane - Universitatea ...

Download - Facultatea de Științe Socio-Umane - Universitatea ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

186<br />

Florin Nicolae ARDELEAN<br />

status 9 . Another crime sanctioned by the medieval military legislation of the<br />

Hungarian kingdom was the forced occupation of noble and priest houses. The<br />

punishment for such a transgression was not pre-established. These minor matters<br />

were left for the captains of the army to judge 10 .<br />

Although the autonomous principality inherited a significant amount of legislation<br />

and the institutional structure from the period of the voievodat, changes started to<br />

happen in the second part of the XVI century, even regarding military regulations.<br />

Some of the authoritarian rulers of Transylvania managed to impose their will in the<br />

political confrontation with the estates. One of them was Stephen Báthory (1571-1576<br />

ruler of Transylvania and from 1576 to 1586 king of the Polish-Lithuanian<br />

Commonwealth and Transylvanian prince), who effectively controlled the internal<br />

and external politics of the principality during his reign. Dating from his period we<br />

have two military regulations elaborated after he was elected to the Polish-Lithuanian<br />

throne, regulations that were also applied to his Transylvanian troops. The first set of<br />

rules dates from 1577, when the army of Báthory was besieging the town of Danzig.<br />

This elaborated regulation follows three major aspects: the discipline of the soldiers,<br />

the organization and security of military camps and the non-fighting auxiliary groups<br />

that followed the army. This regulation tired to impose some severe measures of<br />

discipline:<br />

Soldiers receiving regular payment were not allowed to leave the<br />

camp for plun<strong>de</strong>r forays. They were not allowed to take servants of other<br />

members of the army into their service. Each had to obey the or<strong>de</strong>rs of the<br />

king with no opposition.<br />

If someone stole food, clothes or other objects belonging to other<br />

soldiers was punished with <strong>de</strong>ath by hanging.<br />

Fights between soldiers insi<strong>de</strong> or outsi<strong>de</strong> the camp were forbid<strong>de</strong>n.<br />

Those who neglected this rule and caused injuries were punishable by <strong>de</strong>ath,<br />

if the fight took place without the use of weapons the aggressors had their<br />

arms cut.<br />

All infantry and cavalry officers received a written password and, if<br />

asked, they were obliged to communicate it to the comman<strong>de</strong>rs of the guards<br />

(campiductore).<br />

Soldiers in camp had to obey the signals given by drums and<br />

trumpets of their own unit.<br />

Starting a fire insi<strong>de</strong> the camp, intentionally or by mistake, was<br />

punishable by <strong>de</strong>ath.<br />

Moving chariots or other transportation means insi<strong>de</strong> the camp<br />

was forbid<strong>de</strong>n.<br />

The innkeepers and other merchants were forbid<strong>de</strong>n to enter the<br />

camp receiving special places on the outskirts.<br />

Slaughtering cattle and sheep insi<strong>de</strong> the camp was forbid<strong>de</strong>n.<br />

9<br />

Corpus Juris Hungarici, Tom I, Budae, 1882, Decretum Secundum, Budae Anno Domini 1454, art. 13,<br />

p. 202.<br />

10<br />

Ibi<strong>de</strong>m, Ludovicus II, Decretum Anno 1525, art. 22, p. 332.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!