24.01.2013 Views

Review of anti-corruption strategies Rob McCusker - Australian ...

Review of anti-corruption strategies Rob McCusker - Australian ...

Review of anti-corruption strategies Rob McCusker - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Heidenheimer A & Johnston M (eds) 2002. Political <strong>corruption</strong>: concepts and contexts, 3rd ed. London:<br />

Transaction Publishers<br />

This book incorporates recent work on economic, cultural, and linguistic dimensions <strong>of</strong> the problem<br />

<strong>of</strong> political <strong>corruption</strong> and provides critical analyses <strong>of</strong> approaches to reform. Two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the nearly<br />

fifty articles are especially written or translated for this volume, or based on selected journal literature<br />

published in the 1990s. The tendency to treat <strong>corruption</strong> as a synonym for bribery is illuminated by<br />

analyses <strong>of</strong> the diverse terminology and linguistic techniques that distinguish <strong>corruption</strong> problems in<br />

the major languages. Recent attempts to measure <strong>corruption</strong> and to analyse its causes and effects<br />

qu<strong>anti</strong>tatively are also critically examined. New contributions emphasise <strong>corruption</strong> phenomena in Asia<br />

and Africa, contrasts among region and regime types, the incidence US state <strong>corruption</strong>, European<br />

Party finance and <strong>corruption</strong>; assessments <strong>of</strong> international <strong>corruption</strong> rating’s, analyses <strong>of</strong> international<br />

<strong>corruption</strong> control treaties, and unintended consequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>corruption</strong> efforts.<br />

Johnston M & Kpundeh S 2002. Building a clean machine: <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>corruption</strong> coalitions and sustainable reform.<br />

World Bank Institute working paper 28639. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/WBI/Resources/wbi37208.pdf<br />

This paper argues that social action coalitions, linking public and private actors, are a way to mobilise<br />

participation and advocacy. In Part I, the paper employs Wilson’s (1973) analysis <strong>of</strong> the incentives that<br />

motivate and reward participation in organisations. This approach helps the paper to identify ways<br />

in which the <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>corruption</strong> goals can be augmented by other kinds <strong>of</strong> appeals, even when material<br />

incentives are scarce. The report also identifies four stages <strong>of</strong> the coalition-building process-formation,<br />

credibility, expansion, and transformation, in which differing combinations <strong>of</strong> incentives will be necessary<br />

to address the group’s most important problems and opportunities. In Part II, the paper examines two<br />

important coalition building efforts in light <strong>of</strong> the discussions thus far – Ghana’s Anti-Corruption Coalition,<br />

and the Bangalore Agenda Task Force in Bangalore, Karnataka State, India. In Part III, the paper links<br />

those cases to a broader analysis, suggesting that while purposive incentives are common in the early<br />

phases <strong>of</strong> all coalitions, other varieties must be added to the mix. Wilson’s scheme points to ways in<br />

which the imaginative use <strong>of</strong> incentives can aid the transition from one phase <strong>of</strong> coalition development to<br />

the next. The paper concludes with general strategic issues, suggesting ways in which their analysis can<br />

be applied to those questions given the important variations to be found among cases.<br />

Keuleers P 2002. Corruption in the Lao PDR: underlying causes and key issues for consideration.<br />

Bangkok: UNDP<br />

This paper provides a general overview <strong>of</strong> the situation in some <strong>of</strong> the key governance sectors in Laos<br />

and describes the weaknesses in the administrative, social and political systems that allow <strong>corruption</strong>.<br />

The paper shows that meaningful work has been done by the government, with support <strong>of</strong> the donor<br />

community, to implement state management reforms. But it is also obvious that there are powerful<br />

pockets <strong>of</strong> resistance to change, cultural obstacles and other impediments that explain the difficulties<br />

encountered when tackling the roots <strong>of</strong> the <strong>corruption</strong> problem.<br />

Lai A 2002. Building public confidence in <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>corruption</strong> efforts: the approach <strong>of</strong> the Hong Kong special<br />

administrative region <strong>of</strong> China. Forum on crime and society 2(1): 135–146<br />

This paper charts the transition <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong from a place stricken with widespread <strong>corruption</strong> to<br />

a city acclaimed for its integrity. It discusses the <strong>strategies</strong>, government backing and the need for<br />

sufficient resources and powers to tackle <strong>corruption</strong>. Also discussed is the inception <strong>of</strong> the Independent<br />

Commission against Corruption and the results achieved by the Commission.<br />

Larmour P 2002. Policy transfer in Papua New Guinea and the South Pacific: when, how, who, what and<br />

from where? Pacific economic bulletin 17(2): 55–67<br />

This paper compares attempts to transfer institutions associated with good governance: land registration,<br />

constitutions, representative democracy, public sector reform and <strong>anti</strong>-<strong>corruption</strong>. It asks when the<br />

transfer took place, who was involved, how it took place, and where it came from, and draws some<br />

conclusions about its irrationality.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!