Ties That Bind - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
Ties That Bind - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
Ties That Bind - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
106<br />
<strong>Ties</strong> <strong>That</strong> <strong>Bind</strong><br />
Startups and Turnarounds on a Grand Scale<br />
In the period since China joined the WTO, U.S. companies have been aggressively increasing<br />
their market share through mergers and acquisitions across a range of sectors. Investment is<br />
flowing to China through both private equity (large cap) and venture capital (small cap).<br />
The opportunities presented by State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) are complex. The distressed<br />
condition and opaque accounting practices of many SOEs, the complex multi-agency review and<br />
public auction processes for state-owned and legal person shares, and the inability to exit<br />
through a foreign IPO, has limited enthusiasm for transactions. As an investment banker put it,<br />
“due diligence can be like peeling an onion—the more you peel, the more you cry.” Still, SOEs<br />
represent an opportunity for leveraged buyout specialists to pick up and restructure distressed<br />
assets at favorable prices, de-list and turn them around, and partner with investment banks to<br />
match them with foreign partners.<br />
For most investors, the preferred method of foreign ownership is through offshore holding<br />
companies in Hong Kong, the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, or other favorable locations.<br />
Such offshore entities may be opened and closed, bought and sold, merged or restructured<br />
with little or no Chinese government intervention. While a NASDAQ or New York Stock Exchange<br />
listing may have cache, listings have gravitated toward the Hong Kong Exchanges more<br />
recently—Bank of China is a case in point—to avoid Sarbanes-Oxley and other strict U.S. corporate<br />
governance regulations perceived as unduly burdensome.<br />
Investment transactions in China today may have any of several objectives:<br />
� Rapid entry, presence and brand identity in the China market through M&A<br />
� Vertical integration to achieve scale, synergies and global reach<br />
� Restructure or rollup of companies to prepare for acquisition or IPO<br />
Whether the source is an equity partnership or a venture capital (VC) fund, the strategies are<br />
similar: Build an experienced, credible management team; clean up the balance sheet; implement<br />
global finance and accounting practices; streamline operations; and strengthen the core business<br />
through M&A and vertical integration as needed.<br />
Growing investment opportunity is reflected in increased interest in China by venture capital. A<br />
survey of 505 venture capitalists worldwide, conducted by Deloitte and the National Venture<br />
Capital Association during the second quarter of 2006, identified China and India as the top two<br />
foreign countries where U.S. venture firms plan to put their money in the next five years. Both<br />
countries are viewed as places where 1) it is less expensive to build businesses; 2) there is an<br />
emerging entrepreneurial culture, and 3) there is a high quality deal flow. While India scored<br />
highest in terms of access to quality entrepreneurs, China was the leader in terms of access to<br />
foreign markets. China’s three main impediments to investing for U.S. venture capitalists surveyed<br />
were intellectual property concerns, travel time and effort, and lack of knowledge/expertise<br />
in the business environment. Another is the absence of a liquid IPO market in<br />
China, which leads VC-funded enterprises to go public on the NASDAQ, in Hong Kong or on<br />
other foreign exchanges.