26.01.2013 Views

Ties That Bind - Bay Area Council Economic Institute

Ties That Bind - Bay Area Council Economic Institute

Ties That Bind - Bay Area Council Economic Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

106<br />

<strong>Ties</strong> <strong>That</strong> <strong>Bind</strong><br />

Startups and Turnarounds on a Grand Scale<br />

In the period since China joined the WTO, U.S. companies have been aggressively increasing<br />

their market share through mergers and acquisitions across a range of sectors. Investment is<br />

flowing to China through both private equity (large cap) and venture capital (small cap).<br />

The opportunities presented by State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) are complex. The distressed<br />

condition and opaque accounting practices of many SOEs, the complex multi-agency review and<br />

public auction processes for state-owned and legal person shares, and the inability to exit<br />

through a foreign IPO, has limited enthusiasm for transactions. As an investment banker put it,<br />

“due diligence can be like peeling an onion—the more you peel, the more you cry.” Still, SOEs<br />

represent an opportunity for leveraged buyout specialists to pick up and restructure distressed<br />

assets at favorable prices, de-list and turn them around, and partner with investment banks to<br />

match them with foreign partners.<br />

For most investors, the preferred method of foreign ownership is through offshore holding<br />

companies in Hong Kong, the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, or other favorable locations.<br />

Such offshore entities may be opened and closed, bought and sold, merged or restructured<br />

with little or no Chinese government intervention. While a NASDAQ or New York Stock Exchange<br />

listing may have cache, listings have gravitated toward the Hong Kong Exchanges more<br />

recently—Bank of China is a case in point—to avoid Sarbanes-Oxley and other strict U.S. corporate<br />

governance regulations perceived as unduly burdensome.<br />

Investment transactions in China today may have any of several objectives:<br />

� Rapid entry, presence and brand identity in the China market through M&A<br />

� Vertical integration to achieve scale, synergies and global reach<br />

� Restructure or rollup of companies to prepare for acquisition or IPO<br />

Whether the source is an equity partnership or a venture capital (VC) fund, the strategies are<br />

similar: Build an experienced, credible management team; clean up the balance sheet; implement<br />

global finance and accounting practices; streamline operations; and strengthen the core business<br />

through M&A and vertical integration as needed.<br />

Growing investment opportunity is reflected in increased interest in China by venture capital. A<br />

survey of 505 venture capitalists worldwide, conducted by Deloitte and the National Venture<br />

Capital Association during the second quarter of 2006, identified China and India as the top two<br />

foreign countries where U.S. venture firms plan to put their money in the next five years. Both<br />

countries are viewed as places where 1) it is less expensive to build businesses; 2) there is an<br />

emerging entrepreneurial culture, and 3) there is a high quality deal flow. While India scored<br />

highest in terms of access to quality entrepreneurs, China was the leader in terms of access to<br />

foreign markets. China’s three main impediments to investing for U.S. venture capitalists surveyed<br />

were intellectual property concerns, travel time and effort, and lack of knowledge/expertise<br />

in the business environment. Another is the absence of a liquid IPO market in<br />

China, which leads VC-funded enterprises to go public on the NASDAQ, in Hong Kong or on<br />

other foreign exchanges.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!