Ties That Bind - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
Ties That Bind - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
Ties That Bind - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
118<br />
<strong>Ties</strong> <strong>That</strong> <strong>Bind</strong><br />
throughout China. APMG owns 10 joint ventures in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenyang, Harbin,<br />
Chongqing and Dalian. Some are VIP inpatient units within existing hospitals, while others are<br />
freestanding clinics. APMG’s primary specializations are neurosurgery and radiation oncology,<br />
treating tumors and cancers with high-end “gamma knife” technologies, but an important component<br />
of their facilities is also maintenance and management that meet Western standards.<br />
Among APMG’s Chinese partners are Shanghai Medical University; Beijing Neurological <strong>Institute</strong>;<br />
First Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua University; Shanghai Huashan Hospital of Fudan University,<br />
Chongwen District Public Health Bureau of Beijing, Chinese Medical University’s Second<br />
Affiliated Hospital; and Harbin Medical University’s First Affiliated Hospital. Venture capital<br />
firms ChinaVest and Ajia Partners of Hong Kong have provided financing for the enterprise.<br />
China Grows Its Semiconductor Sector<br />
An earlier section of this report described the flow of Taiwanese engineering and science students<br />
to the U.S. during the 1970s, and the Taiwan government’s strategy to lure them back with<br />
venture and startup funding. In the process, Taiwanese engineers in Silicon Valley helped pioneer<br />
a new, more efficient and economic “fabless/foundry” business model for integrated circuit design<br />
and development.<br />
Chips have become ever smaller, faster, more complex, more specialized and more densely<br />
packed together on larger, 300-millimeter wafers to perform specific tasks. As they have, the cost<br />
of materials, fabrication and testing have all increased commensurately. An integrated device<br />
manufacturer (IDM) like Intel, Advanced Micro Devices or Texas Instruments, that makes its<br />
own chip designs may spend more than $3 billion to build a fabrication plant.<br />
Over the long term a typical 10:1 revenue-cost ratio still makes the effort worthwhile in many<br />
cases: A 0.25-micron chip design that costs $1 million to bring to market may earn $10 million,<br />
for example, while a higher-end, 90-nanometer design that costs $25 million might earn back<br />
$250 million. Customization has also opened new applications and markets for high-end designers,<br />
as basic chips have become increasingly commoditized. In addition, demand for higher-end<br />
chips has grown well beyond narrow specialty applications in a few technology-intensive industries<br />
to high-volume, mass markets like automobiles, personal computing, mobile phones and<br />
consumer electronics.<br />
The Fabless Alternative<br />
For startups and smaller boutique design firms as well as for larger, more vertically-integrated<br />
producers, managing up front costs is critical in maintaining margins and competitive advantage.<br />
As the Semiconductor Industry Association describes the current market:<br />
“Fabless companies focus on designing and marketing competitive products, while<br />
farming out wafer production to foundries. The foundries are able to invest the<br />
billions of dollars necessary to upgrade and grow their capacity by spreading the