Ties That Bind - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
Ties That Bind - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
Ties That Bind - Bay Area Council Economic Institute
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
138<br />
<strong>Ties</strong> <strong>That</strong> <strong>Bind</strong><br />
whether restrictive visa policies are the most effective way to address these issues, particularly<br />
when the restrict U.S. access to the best global talent.<br />
Chinese investment in the <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>Area</strong> is still mostly in commercial and hotel property, angel and<br />
venture investment in Silicon Valley technology companies, and small-scale retail. A few investments<br />
have made headlines, such as the $1.05 billion purchase of San Francisco’s Bank of<br />
America Center by a Hong Kong investor group in September 2005, and Hong Kong-based<br />
Cornerstone Overseas Investment’s acquisition of Emeryville toymaker Wham-O Inc. in<br />
January 2006. China National Offshore Oil Co. (CNOOC)’s bidding war with San Ramon-based<br />
Chevron Corp. for Unocal Corp. drew the most attention, following on the heels of Lenovo’s<br />
acquisition of IBM’s PC manufacturing unit and the competing bids by Haier and Maytag<br />
for Whirlpool.<br />
“Greenfield” investments in new plants and office parks, along with corporate mergers and acquisitions,<br />
have up to now been largely one-way—from the U.S. to China. <strong>That</strong> may soon<br />
change, however. Cumulative Chinese overseas investment at the end of 2005 totaled $57.2 billion,<br />
according to China’s Ministry of Commerce. Chinese direct investment overseas during<br />
2005 totaled $12.26 billion, a 123% increase over 2004. Chinese consumer goods and technology<br />
firms may spend as much as $80 billion in overseas investment in 2005–06. Sitting on close to $1<br />
trillion dollars in foreign reserves, China’s government is giving the green light for its companies<br />
to invest abroad, and in the coming years they will be looking for complimentary mergers and<br />
acquisitions, strategic partnerships and equity investments that will help them build global brands<br />
and distribution networks, and access markets and technology. This presents an opportunity for<br />
the <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>Area</strong>.<br />
This road may prove bumpy at times as some transactions are likely to raise security or intellectual<br />
property issues, including questions about the so-called “deemed exports” of technology<br />
through shared personnel and data within a merged entity.<br />
In the course of conducting interviews and other research for this report, a number of ideas surfaced<br />
for ways to expand and add value to the <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>Area</strong>-China relationship. While not exhaustive,<br />
proposals focused in two main areas: strengthening U.S. and <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>Area</strong> competitiveness by<br />
influencing federal and state policies with respect to education, immigration, and funding for<br />
research; and leveraging the <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>Area</strong>’s distinct assets to increase trade and attract even more<br />
China-related business and investment in the future.<br />
Strengthening <strong>Economic</strong> and Technological Competitiveness<br />
China’s growing economic and technological capacity will pose both opportunities and new<br />
challenges for U.S. and <strong>Bay</strong> <strong>Area</strong> technological leadership. Its assertion of a greater global role<br />
will require a nuanced approach to the U.S.-China relationship, to take account of rising competition<br />
as well as opportunities for cooperation. In that evolving relationship, it is critical that the<br />
U.S. and California invest in and leverage their competitive strengths: