- Page 1 and 2:
National Status and Trends Program
- Page 3 and 4:
Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Yea
- Page 5 and 6:
Human Reporter Gene System (Cytochr
- Page 7 and 8:
List of Appendices Appendix A . Det
- Page 9 and 10:
Figure 10. Results of 1998 Microtox
- Page 11 and 12:
Figure 38. Central Puget Sound stat
- Page 13 and 14:
Table 14. Number of 1998 central Pu
- Page 15 and 16:
Table 34. Triad results for 1998 ce
- Page 17 and 18:
Abstract As a component of a three-
- Page 19 and 20:
tests; and 3% of the area in the cy
- Page 21 and 22:
Data from this central Puget Sound
- Page 23 and 24:
Project Background Introduction hi
- Page 25 and 26:
Considerable research has been cond
- Page 27 and 28:
toxicants in regions of Puget Sound
- Page 29 and 30:
This report includes a summary of t
- Page 31 and 32:
stations within each stratum were c
- Page 33 and 34:
jugs which had been washed, acid-st
- Page 35 and 36:
clean, filtered (0.45 um), Port Ara
- Page 37 and 38:
have been exposed to one or more of
- Page 39 and 40:
enforcement studies. Seven addition
- Page 41 and 42:
analyses will be reported elsewhere
- Page 43 and 44:
100 samples were compared to the up
- Page 45 and 46:
Correlations were determined for al
- Page 47 and 48:
Results A record of all field notes
- Page 49 and 50:
As a corollary to and verification
- Page 51 and 52:
to station 15 1, then decreased ste
- Page 53 and 54:
variance of the other tests with re
- Page 55 and 56:
espectively, and each station had 1
- Page 57 and 58:
exceeded state criteria and nationa
- Page 59 and 60:
assays, enzyme induction was very h
- Page 61 and 62:
Isomers of DDT and most PCB congene
- Page 63 and 64:
Total abundance of miscellaneous ta
- Page 65 and 66:
(i.e., increasing toxicity), there
- Page 67 and 68:
Triad Synthesis: A Comparison of Ch
- Page 69 and 70:
Stratum 6, in Puget Sound's central
- Page 71 and 72:
grain size, rather than the toxicit
- Page 73 and 74:
Eight samples collected along the s
- Page 75 and 76:
Inlet), 170- 17 1 (Dyes Inlet), 1 1
- Page 77 and 78:
The results in the amphipod tests p
- Page 79 and 80:
Human Reporter Gene System (Cytochr
- Page 81 and 82:
The highest concentrations of mixtu
- Page 83 and 84:
and Conner, 1980; Gray, 1982: Becke
- Page 85 and 86:
However, benthic data have been gen
- Page 87 and 88:
data for benzoic acid, 44 samples h
- Page 89 and 90:
Literature Cited Adams, D.A., J.S.
- Page 91 and 92:
California Department of Fish and G
- Page 93 and 94:
and vicinity. NOAA Tech. Memo. NOS
- Page 95 and 96:
Strait of Juan De Fuca Figure 1. Ma
- Page 97 and 98:
Figure 3a. Central Puget Sound samp
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 3c. Central Puget Sound samp
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 3e. Central Puget Sound samp
- Page 103 and 104:
I / Amphipod survival 0 not toxic s
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 6. Summary of 1998 amphipod
- Page 107 and 108:
Amphipod survival 0 not toxic 0 sig
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 10. Results of 1998 Microtox
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 12. Results of 1998 Microtox
- Page 113 and 114:
Whidbey Rlsland Figure 14. Results
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 16. Results of 1998 cytochro
- Page 117 and 118:
Seattle Figure 18. Results of 1998
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure 20. Sampling stations in Por
- Page 121 and 122:
1 6 0 Sinclair 1 9 Inlet ]\ 0 No Cr
- Page 123 and 124:
0 Rho = 0.928 o p < 0.0001 Sample 1
- Page 125 and 126:
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 600
- Page 127 and 128:
Rho = -0.584 p < 0.0001 0 20 40 60
- Page 129 and 130:
Rho = 0.875 p < 0.0001 0 500 1000 1
- Page 131 and 132:
I 0 1 Stations lacking any signific
- Page 133 and 134:
0 Stations lacking any significant
- Page 135 and 136:
Table 1. Central Puget Sound sampli
- Page 137 and 138:
Table 2. Continued. Oxychlordane To
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 3. Chemistry Parameters: Labo
- Page 141 and 142:
Table 5. Benthic infaunal indices c
- Page 143 and 144:
Table 6. Continued. Stratum Locatio
- Page 145 and 146: Table 6. Continued. Stratum Locatio
- Page 147 and 148: Table 7. Continued. 100% pore water
- Page 149 and 150: Table 7. Continued. 100% pore water
- Page 151 and 152: Table 8. Results of MicrotoxTM test
- Page 153 and 154: Table 8. Continued. ~icrotox~~ EC50
- Page 155 and 156: Table 8. Continued. Microtox"" EC50
- Page 157 and 158: Table 10. Spearman-rank correlation
- Page 159 and 160: Table 12. Samples from 1998 central
- Page 161 and 162: Table 13. Samples from 1998 central
- Page 163 and 164: Table 13. Continued. Stratum, Sampl
- Page 165 and 166: Table 14. Number of 1998 central Pu
- Page 167 and 168: Table 14. Continued. - > ERMa > sQs
- Page 169 and 170: Table 14. Continued. > E RM~ - > SQ
- Page 171 and 172: Table 16. Spearman-rank correlation
- Page 173 and 174: Table 18. Spearman-rank correlation
- Page 175 and 176: Table 20. Spearman-rank correlation
- Page 177 and 178: Table 22. Total abundance, major ta
- Page 179 and 180: Table 22. Continued. Annelida Arthr
- Page 181 and 182: Table 22. Continued. Annelida Arthr
- Page 183 and 184: Table 23. Continued. Central Basin
- Page 185 and 186: Table 23. Continued. Stratum Sample
- Page 187 and 188: Table 25. Spearman-rank correlation
- Page 189 and 190: if; c if; c Page 167
- Page 191 and 192: Page 169
- Page 193 and 194: Table 30. Spearman-rank correlation
- Page 195: Table 32. Spearman-rank correlation
- Page 199 and 200: Page 177
- Page 201 and 202: Page 179
- Page 203 and 204: Page 181
- Page 205 and 206: F Ni111iber of CSLs exceeded I o~np
- Page 207 and 208: Page 185
- Page 209: -4 s "- I") CN m c L S3 N ¤g" "?
- Page 212 and 213: Page 190
- Page 214 and 215: Page 192
- Page 216 and 217: Table 36. Spatial extent of toxicit
- Page 218 and 219: Table 38. Spatial extent of toxicit
- Page 220 and 221: Table 40. Percentages of two Puget
- Page 223 and 224: Appendix A. Detected chemicals from
- Page 225 and 226: Appendix A. Continued. SQS Chemical
- Page 227 and 228: Appendix A. Continued. SQS Chemical
- Page 229 and 230: Appendix A. Continued. SQS Chemical
- Page 231 and 232: Appendix A. Continued. SQS Chemical
- Page 233 and 234: Appendix B Navigation report for th
- Page 235 and 236: Appendix B. Navigation report for t
- Page 237 and 238: Page 2 15
- Page 239 and 240: - IT! 0 m - 00 m N (^-I - - 00 0 00
- Page 241 and 242: Page 2 19
- Page 243 and 244: -4 r^i n't n'l - f^t 2 Page 22 1
- Page 245 and 246: w ""I n N - I 1 - 7' . > ? n 9 . t
- Page 247 and 248:
Appendix C Field notes for the 1998
- Page 249 and 250:
Appendix C. Field notes for the 199
- Page 251 and 252:
Appendix C. Continued. Temp-. Salin
- Page 253 and 254:
Appendix D Chemistry data summary.
- Page 255 and 256:
Appendix D, Table 1. Grain size dis
- Page 257 and 258:
I Appendix D. Table 1. Continued. %
- Page 259 and 260:
Appendix D. Table 1. Continued. % %
- Page 261 and 262:
Appendix D. Table 2. Continued. Str
- Page 263 and 264:
Appendix D. Table 2. Continued. Str
- Page 265 and 266:
Appendix D. Table 3. Continued. COM
- Page 267 and 268:
Appendix D. Table 3. Continued. COM
- Page 269 and 270:
Appendix D. Table 3. Continued. COM
- Page 271 and 272:
Appendix D, Figure 1. Grain size di
- Page 273 and 274:
Appendix D, Figure 1. continued. St
- Page 275 and 276:
Appendix D, Figure 1. continued. St
- Page 277:
Appendix E 1998 Central Puget Sound
- Page 280 and 281:
Appendix E. Continued. Phylum Class
- Page 282 and 283:
Appendix E. Continued. Phylum Class
- Page 284 and 285:
Appendix E. Continued. - - -- - - -
- Page 286 and 287:
Appendix E. Continued. Phylum Class
- Page 288 and 289:
Appendix E. Continued. Phylum Class
- Page 290 and 291:
Appendix E. Continued. Phylum Class
- Page 292 and 293:
Appendix E. Continued. Phvlum Class
- Page 294 and 295:
Appendix E. Continued. Phvlum Class
- Page 296 and 297:
Page 274
- Page 298 and 299:
Page 276
- Page 300 and 301:
Page 278
- Page 302 and 303:
Page 280 . I......... ^$^$$$$$$$$ -
- Page 304 and 305:
Page 282
- Page 306 and 307:
Page 284
- Page 308 and 309:
Appendix G. Continued. Elimination
- Page 311 and 312:
nine Page 289
- Page 313 and 314:
Page 29 1
- Page 315 and 316:
Page 293
- Page 317 and 318:
--- Page 295
- Page 319 and 320:
OJllIO,] JO % Sl! ll!A!AJ11~ pOd!l[
- Page 321 and 322:
Appendix H. Continued. 13, 142, Lib
- Page 323 and 324:
Page 301
- Page 325 and 326:
Page 303
- Page 327 and 328:
Page 305
- Page 329 and 330:
Page 307
- Page 331 and 332:
Page 309
- Page 333 and 334:
Page 3 1 1
- Page 335 and 336:
Page 3 13
- Page 337 and 338:
It" Page 3 15
- Page 339 and 340:
Page 3 17
- Page 341:
Appendix I Ranges in detected chemi
- Page 344 and 345:
2' ^0 Appendix I. Continued. Range
- Page 346 and 347:
Page 324 E E E E E E E E E Q Q C ,
- Page 348 and 349:
Page 326
- Page 350 and 351:
Appendix I. Continued. -- w 'B Rang
- Page 353 and 354:
Appendix J. SEDQUAL surveys for the
- Page 355 and 356:
Appendix J. Continued. Agency Name
- Page 357 and 358:
Agency Name Survey Name Beginning d
- Page 359 and 360:
0 - M M m m m m CT\mmo^ - + \ \ \ \
- Page 361 and 362:
Appendix K National and Washington
- Page 363 and 364:
Appendix K. National and Washington
- Page 365:
Appendix K. Continued. Miscelianeou