Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix A. Detected chemicals from central Puget Sound sediment samples in the SEDQUAL database Washington State Sediment Quality Standards (SQS) and Puget Sound Marine Sediment Cleanup Screen SQS Chemical Contaminant SQS Sample location (No. of samples) value CSL Sample location (No. of samples) Central Basin (2), Dogfish Bay (I), Duwarnish River (3), East Waterway (2), Elliott Bay (I), Liberty Bay (1) Duwamish River (3), Eagle Harbor (2j, North Harbor Island ( 1 ) Dogfish Bay (2), Duwamish River (29), Dyes Inlet (1 ), East Waterway (6), Elliott Bay (9), Liberty Bay (l), Point Pully (I), Sinclair Inlet (4), West Waterway (2) Bainbridge Island (5), Duwamish River ( I), Eagle Harbor (6), Elliott Bay (31, North Harbor Island (6), Sinclair Inlet (I), West Waterway (4) Alki Beach (I), Central Sound (3), Duwamish River (7), Dyes Inlet (6), Eagle Harbor (6), Elliott Bay (1 2), Kellogg Island (l), Liberty Bay (l), Magnolia Bluff (3), North Harbor Island (6), Point Pulley (5), Shilshole Bay (2), Sinclair Inlet (4), Port Townsend (3) Duwamish River ( I), North Harbor Island ( 1 ), Elliott Bay ( I ), West Point (6) Dogfish Bay (l), D~~wamish River (5), Dyes Inlet (I), Elliott Bay (4), Kellogg Island (I), Key Port (I), North Harbor Island (I), Sinclair Inlet (I), West Point (2), West Waterway (2) Central Basin (I), Dogfish Bay (I), Duw (3), East Waterway (I), Elliott Bay (I), L (1 Duwamish River (3), Eagle Harbor (2), Island (I) Dogfish Bay (2), Duwamish River (1 8), East Waterway (6), Elliott Bay (4), Libe Point Pully (I), Sinclair Inlet (4), West Bainbridge Island (5), Duwamish River Harbor (6), Elliott Bay (3), North Harbo Sinclair Inlet (l), West Waterway (4) Central Sound (3), Duwamish River (6), (6), Eagle Harbor (6), Elliott Bay (8), Ke (I), Liberty Bay (I), Magnolia Bluff (I) Island (4), Point Pulley (5), Shilshole Ba Inlet (4), Port Townsend (3) Duwamish River (1 j, North Harbor Islan Bay (1 ), West Point (6) Dogfish Bay (I), Duwan~ish River (5), D Elliott Bay (4), Kellogg Island (l), Key Harbor Island (I), Sinclair Inlet (I), Wes West Waterway 0
Page 1 and 2:
National Status and Trends Program
Page 3 and 4:
Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Yea
Page 5 and 6:
Human Reporter Gene System (Cytochr
Page 7 and 8:
List of Appendices Appendix A . Det
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 10. Results of 1998 Microtox
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 38. Central Puget Sound stat
Page 13 and 14:
Table 14. Number of 1998 central Pu
Page 15 and 16:
Table 34. Triad results for 1998 ce
Page 17 and 18:
Abstract As a component of a three-
Page 19 and 20:
tests; and 3% of the area in the cy
Page 21 and 22:
Data from this central Puget Sound
Page 23 and 24:
Project Background Introduction hi
Page 25 and 26:
Considerable research has been cond
Page 27 and 28:
toxicants in regions of Puget Sound
Page 29 and 30:
This report includes a summary of t
Page 31 and 32:
stations within each stratum were c
Page 33 and 34:
jugs which had been washed, acid-st
Page 35 and 36:
clean, filtered (0.45 um), Port Ara
Page 37 and 38:
have been exposed to one or more of
Page 39 and 40:
enforcement studies. Seven addition
Page 41 and 42:
analyses will be reported elsewhere
Page 43 and 44:
100 samples were compared to the up
Page 45 and 46:
Correlations were determined for al
Page 47 and 48:
Results A record of all field notes
Page 49 and 50:
As a corollary to and verification
Page 51 and 52:
to station 15 1, then decreased ste
Page 53 and 54:
variance of the other tests with re
Page 55 and 56:
espectively, and each station had 1
Page 57 and 58:
exceeded state criteria and nationa
Page 59 and 60:
assays, enzyme induction was very h
Page 61 and 62:
Isomers of DDT and most PCB congene
Page 63 and 64:
Total abundance of miscellaneous ta
Page 65 and 66:
(i.e., increasing toxicity), there
Page 67 and 68:
Triad Synthesis: A Comparison of Ch
Page 69 and 70:
Stratum 6, in Puget Sound's central
Page 71 and 72:
grain size, rather than the toxicit
Page 73 and 74:
Eight samples collected along the s
Page 75 and 76:
Inlet), 170- 17 1 (Dyes Inlet), 1 1
Page 77 and 78:
The results in the amphipod tests p
Page 79 and 80:
Human Reporter Gene System (Cytochr
Page 81 and 82:
The highest concentrations of mixtu
Page 83 and 84:
and Conner, 1980; Gray, 1982: Becke
Page 85 and 86:
However, benthic data have been gen
Page 87 and 88:
data for benzoic acid, 44 samples h
Page 89 and 90:
Literature Cited Adams, D.A., J.S.
Page 91 and 92:
California Department of Fish and G
Page 93 and 94:
and vicinity. NOAA Tech. Memo. NOS
Page 95 and 96:
Strait of Juan De Fuca Figure 1. Ma
Page 97 and 98:
Figure 3a. Central Puget Sound samp
Page 99 and 100:
Figure 3c. Central Puget Sound samp
Page 101 and 102:
Figure 3e. Central Puget Sound samp
Page 103 and 104:
I / Amphipod survival 0 not toxic s
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 6. Summary of 1998 amphipod
Page 107 and 108:
Amphipod survival 0 not toxic 0 sig
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Whidbey Rlsland Figure 14. Results
Page 115 and 116:
Figure 16. Results of 1998 cytochro
Page 117 and 118:
Seattle Figure 18. Results of 1998
Page 119 and 120:
Figure 20. Sampling stations in Por
Page 121 and 122:
1 6 0 Sinclair 1 9 Inlet ]\ 0 No Cr
Page 123 and 124:
0 Rho = 0.928 o p < 0.0001 Sample 1
Page 125 and 126:
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 600
Page 127 and 128:
Rho = -0.584 p < 0.0001 0 20 40 60
Page 129 and 130:
Rho = 0.875 p < 0.0001 0 500 1000 1
Page 131 and 132:
I 0 1 Stations lacking any signific
Page 133 and 134:
0 Stations lacking any significant
Page 135 and 136:
Table 1. Central Puget Sound sampli
Page 137 and 138:
Table 2. Continued. Oxychlordane To
Page 139 and 140:
Table 3. Chemistry Parameters: Labo
Page 141 and 142:
Table 5. Benthic infaunal indices c
Page 143 and 144:
Table 6. Continued. Stratum Locatio
Page 145 and 146:
Table 6. Continued. Stratum Locatio
Page 147 and 148:
Table 7. Continued. 100% pore water
Page 149 and 150:
Table 7. Continued. 100% pore water
Page 151 and 152:
Table 8. Results of MicrotoxTM test
Page 153 and 154:
Table 8. Continued. ~icrotox~~ EC50
Page 155 and 156:
Table 8. Continued. Microtox"" EC50
Page 157 and 158:
Table 10. Spearman-rank correlation
Page 159 and 160:
Table 12. Samples from 1998 central
Page 161 and 162:
Table 13. Samples from 1998 central
Page 163 and 164:
Table 13. Continued. Stratum, Sampl
Page 165 and 166:
Table 14. Number of 1998 central Pu
Page 167 and 168:
Table 14. Continued. - > ERMa > sQs
Page 169 and 170:
Table 14. Continued. > E RM~ - > SQ
Page 171 and 172: Table 16. Spearman-rank correlation
Page 177 and 178: Table 22. Total abundance, major ta
Page 179 and 180: Table 22. Continued. Annelida Arthr
Page 181 and 182: Table 22. Continued. Annelida Arthr
Page 183 and 184: Table 23. Continued. Central Basin
Page 185 and 186: Table 23. Continued. Stratum Sample
Page 189 and 190: if; c if; c Page 167
Page 191 and 192: Page 169
Page 208 and 209: is-
Page 215 and 216: Table 35. Distribution of results i
Page 217 and 218: Table 37. Spatial extent of toxicit
Page 219 and 220: Table 39. Spatial extent of toxicit
Page 221: Appendix A Detected chemicals from
Page 225 and 226: Appendix A. Continued. SQS Chemical
Page 233 and 234: Appendix B Navigation report for th
Page 235 and 236: Appendix B. Navigation report for t
Page 237 and 238: Page 2 15
Page 239 and 240: - IT! 0 m - 00 m N (^-I - - 00 0 00
Page 241 and 242: Page 2 19
Page 243 and 244: -4 r^i n't n'l - f^t 2 Page 22 1
Page 245 and 246: w ""I n N - I 1 - 7' . > ? n 9 . t
Page 247 and 248: Appendix C Field notes for the 1998
Page 249 and 250: Appendix C. Field notes for the 199
Page 251 and 252: Appendix C. Continued. Temp-. Salin
Page 253 and 254: Appendix D Chemistry data summary.
Page 255 and 256: Appendix D, Table 1. Grain size dis
Page 257 and 258: I Appendix D. Table 1. Continued. %
Page 259 and 260: Appendix D. Table 1. Continued. % %
Page 261 and 262: Appendix D. Table 2. Continued. Str
Page 263 and 264: Appendix D. Table 2. Continued. Str
Page 265 and 266: Appendix D. Table 3. Continued. COM
Page 271 and 272: Appendix D, Figure 1. Grain size di
Page 273 and 274:
Appendix D, Figure 1. continued. St
Page 275 and 276:
Appendix D, Figure 1. continued. St
Page 277:
Appendix E 1998 Central Puget Sound
Page 280 and 281:
Appendix E. Continued. Phylum Class
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Appendix E. Continued. - - -- - - -
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Appendix E. Continued. Phvlum Class
Page 294 and 295:
Appendix E. Continued. Phvlum Class
Page 296 and 297:
Page 274
Page 298 and 299:
Page 276
Page 300 and 301:
Page 278
Page 302 and 303:
Page 280 . I......... ^$^$$$$$$$$ -
Page 304 and 305:
Page 282
Page 306 and 307:
Page 284
Page 308 and 309:
Appendix G. Continued. Elimination
Page 311 and 312:
nine Page 289
Page 313 and 314:
Page 29 1
Page 315 and 316:
Page 293
Page 317 and 318:
--- Page 295
Page 319 and 320:
OJllIO,] JO % Sl! ll!A!AJ11~ pOd!l[
Page 321 and 322:
Appendix H. Continued. 13, 142, Lib
Page 323 and 324:
Page 301
Page 325 and 326:
Page 303
Page 327 and 328:
Page 305
Page 329 and 330:
Page 307
Page 331 and 332:
Page 309
Page 333 and 334:
Page 3 1 1
Page 335 and 336:
Page 3 13
Page 337 and 338:
It" Page 3 15
Page 339 and 340:
Page 3 17
Page 341:
Appendix I Ranges in detected chemi
Page 344 and 345:
2' ^0 Appendix I. Continued. Range
Page 346 and 347:
Page 324 E E E E E E E E E Q Q C ,
Page 348 and 349:
Page 326
Page 350 and 351:
Appendix I. Continued. -- w 'B Rang
Page 353 and 354:
Appendix J. SEDQUAL surveys for the
Page 355 and 356:
Appendix J. Continued. Agency Name
Page 357 and 358:
Agency Name Survey Name Beginning d
Page 359 and 360:
0 - M M m m m m CT\mmo^ - + \ \ \ \
Page 361 and 362:
Appendix K National and Washington
Page 363 and 364:
Appendix K. National and Washington
Page 365:
Appendix K. Continued. Miscelianeou
show all

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?