30.01.2013 Views

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Spatial Patterns <strong>in</strong> Chemical Contam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

The spatial (geographic) patterns <strong>in</strong> chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by identify<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

maps the locations of sampl<strong>in</strong>g stations <strong>in</strong> which numerical sediment quality guidel<strong>in</strong>es (ERM,<br />

SQS, and CSL values) were exceeded (Figures 19-23). Tables 12 and 13 provide detail regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the specific chemical compo.unds that exceeded these guidel<strong>in</strong>e values at each station. The<br />

number of compounds exceed<strong>in</strong>g the ERL values and the mean ERM quotient calculated <strong>for</strong> each<br />

station, are also provided <strong>in</strong> Tables 12 and 13, and discussed below.<br />

Spatial patterns <strong>in</strong> chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> strata 1,2,4, and 5 near Port Townsend, southern<br />

Admiralty Inlet, and <strong>in</strong> Possession <strong>Sound</strong>, are displayed <strong>in</strong> Figure 19 and summarized <strong>in</strong> Table<br />

12. None of the ERM values were exceeded <strong>in</strong> these 12 sediment samples. The ERM quotients<br />

<strong>for</strong> all samples except those from stations 107 and 1 18 were less than 0.1, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that very<br />

little contam<strong>in</strong>ation occurred <strong>in</strong> this area. For samples 107 and 1 18, three chemicals exceeded<br />

the ERL values, and mean ERM quotients were 0.24 and 0.13, respectively, suggest<strong>in</strong>g a slight<br />

degree of contam<strong>in</strong>ation. One chemical, 4-methylphenol, exceeded state SQS and CSL values at<br />

six stations with<strong>in</strong> strata 1,2,4, and 5. Five of these samples were collected <strong>in</strong> Port Townsend<br />

(stations 106-1 09, 1 1 1) and the other near Mukilteo (station 1 18) <strong>in</strong> Possession <strong>Sound</strong>.<br />

None of the chemical concentrations <strong>in</strong> samples from strata 6-8 <strong>in</strong> the central bas<strong>in</strong> and Port<br />

Madison, and <strong>in</strong> strata 13-1 5 (Liberty BayIKeyportlBa<strong>in</strong>bridge Island) exceeded ERM values<br />

(Figure 20, Table 12). Mean ERM quotients <strong>in</strong> these samples were low (0.04 to 0.26). Samples<br />

with chemical concentrations exceed<strong>in</strong>g ERL values <strong>in</strong>cluded those from stations 128 (16<br />

compounds); 142-144, 146 (4 each); 148 (3); 129 (2); and 122, 123(1 each). As <strong>in</strong> strata 1,2,4,<br />

and 5, the SQS and CSL values <strong>for</strong> 4-methylphenol were exceeded <strong>in</strong> samples 113, 122, 123, and<br />

148, aga<strong>in</strong> suggest<strong>in</strong>g these samples were only slightly contam<strong>in</strong>ated.<br />

In the samples collected <strong>in</strong> the southern reaches of the central bas<strong>in</strong> and Eagle Harbor, all<br />

chemical concentrations were below the ERM values (Figure 21, Table 12). However, <strong>in</strong><br />

samples 130 and 13 1 from Eagle Harbor, mean ERM quotients were 0.33 and 0.36 and 17 and 19<br />

ERLs were exceeded, respectively, <strong>in</strong> these samples, suggest<strong>in</strong>g a slight degree of contam<strong>in</strong>ation.<br />

The CSL concentration <strong>for</strong> 4-methylphenol was aga<strong>in</strong> exceeded <strong>in</strong> the sample from station 140.<br />

No other samples from strata 9-12 had chemical concentrations exceed<strong>in</strong>g Wash<strong>in</strong>gton State<br />

sediment standards.<br />

Figure 22 and Table 12 summarize spatial patterns <strong>for</strong> chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> the sediments<br />

collected near Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge Island, Port Orchard, and Bremerton (strata 16-22). Contam<strong>in</strong>ant<br />

levels <strong>in</strong> the samples collected from strata 16 through 18,21, and station 169 (Dyes Inlet) were<br />

all measured below ERM values, with low mean ERM quotients (0.04 - 0.19). The ERL values<br />

were exceeded at stations 15 1 and 153 (SW Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge Island), and 168 (Port Wash<strong>in</strong>gton<br />

Narrows), while the CSL values <strong>for</strong> benzyl alcohol was exceeded only at station 15 1.<br />

Samples from stations 170 and 17 1 <strong>in</strong> Dyes Inlet also displayed no contam<strong>in</strong>ant levels above<br />

ERM values, with the exception of nickel at station 170. Long et al. (1995), however, suggested<br />

that there was a limited degree of reliability <strong>in</strong> the ERM value <strong>for</strong> nickel, and that nickel does not<br />

play a major role <strong>in</strong> caus<strong>in</strong>g toxicity. The mean ERM quotient values were higher, 0.25 and 0.26,<br />

Page 32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!