30.01.2013 Views

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In this survey of central <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>, 36 of the 100 stations sampled had sediments with<br />

significant toxicity and elevated chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation, while 18 appeared to have benthic<br />

communities that were possibly affected by chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ants <strong>in</strong> the sediments, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stations <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>clair Inlet, Dyes Inlet, Elliott Bay, and the Duwamish River. These stations<br />

typically had moderate to very high total abundance, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g high numbers of Aphelochaeta<br />

species N1 and other pollution-tolerant species, moderate to high taxa richness, low evenness,<br />

and low Swartz's Dom<strong>in</strong>ance Index values. Often, pollution-sensitive species such as arthropods<br />

and ech<strong>in</strong>oderms were low <strong>in</strong> abundance or absent from these stations. These 18 stations<br />

represented an area of 8.1 km2, or about 1.1 % of the total survey area. These 18 stations, all<br />

located <strong>in</strong> urbald<strong>in</strong>dustrial areas, provide possible "evidence of pollution-<strong>in</strong>duced degradation" as<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed by Chapman, 1996.<br />

In contrast, 25 stations were identified with no <strong>in</strong>dications of significant sediment toxicity or<br />

chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation. All of the benthic <strong>in</strong>dices <strong>in</strong>dicated abundant and diverse populations<br />

of most or all taxonomic groups. These stations, located <strong>in</strong> Port Townsend, Admiralty Inlet,<br />

Possession <strong>Sound</strong>, the central bas<strong>in</strong>, Port Madison, Liberty Bay, the Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge Bas<strong>in</strong>, Rich<br />

Passage, Dyes Inlet, and outer Elliott Bay, represented an area of 359.3 km2, equivalent to<br />

approximately 49% of the total survey area, and provide "strong evidence aga<strong>in</strong>st pollution-<br />

<strong>in</strong>duced degradation" as def<strong>in</strong>ed by Chapman, 1996.<br />

The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g thirty-n<strong>in</strong>e stations, with either significant chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation but no toxicity,<br />

or significant toxicity but no chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation, were located <strong>in</strong> Port Townsend, Possession<br />

<strong>Sound</strong>, the central bas<strong>in</strong>, Eagle Harbor, Liberty Bay, the Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge Bas<strong>in</strong>, and Elliott Bay and<br />

the Duwamish River, and represented an area of 272.6 km2, equivalent to about 37% of the total<br />

central <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> study area. Benthic assemblages varied considerably <strong>in</strong> structure at these<br />

stations, presumably as a result of many factors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g natural environmental variables.<br />

Additional statistical analyses are required to fully describe the multivariate relationships among<br />

the sediment quality triad data, and other variable data collected at all 100 stations.<br />

Comparison of the results of the sediment quality triad analyses <strong>for</strong> this survey was made with<br />

the 1997 survey of northern <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> (Table 40). In both surveys, the percent of the total<br />

study areas display<strong>in</strong>g toxicity, chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation and altered benthos was similar (1.3 and<br />

1.1% area, respectively). Of the area surveyed <strong>in</strong> 1997 (773.9 km2), ten stations represent<strong>in</strong>g<br />

10.34 km2 (1.3% of the area) could be considered as hav<strong>in</strong>g pollution-<strong>in</strong>duced degradation. N<strong>in</strong>e<br />

of these samples were collected <strong>in</strong> Everett Harbor and one from Port Gardner. The estimate of<br />

1.3% area was similar to the estimate of 1.1% <strong>for</strong> the 18 "degraded" stations identified <strong>in</strong> the<br />

central <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> study area. In addition, 10.6% of the 1997 northern area had both high<br />

chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation and high toxicity, but, was accompanied by high benthic abundance and<br />

diversity. For central <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>, this estimate was similar (12.5%). In contrast, the samples<br />

with no contam<strong>in</strong>ation and no toxicity represented 19.6% of the northern area and 49% of the<br />

central area. Conversely, the balance of samples <strong>in</strong> which results were mixed (i.e., either<br />

chemistry or toxicity was significant, benthos was abundant and diverse) was almost twice as<br />

high <strong>in</strong> the northern study area (68.5%) than <strong>in</strong> the central study area (37%).<br />

Because of the natural differences <strong>in</strong> benthic communities among different estuaries, it is<br />

difficult to compare the communities from <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> with those from other regions <strong>in</strong> the U.S.<br />

Page 62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!