30.01.2013 Views

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and Conner, 1980; Gray, 1982: Becker et al., 1990; Ferraro et al., 1991 ; Llanso et al.,1998b).<br />

Major differences <strong>in</strong> benthic communities can result from wide ranges <strong>in</strong> water depths, oxygen<br />

concentrations at the sediment-water <strong>in</strong>terface, the texture (gra<strong>in</strong> size) and geochemical<br />

composition of the sediment particles, porewater sal<strong>in</strong>ity as a function of proximity to a river or<br />

stream, bottom water current velocity or physical disturbance as a result of natural scour<strong>in</strong>g or<br />

maritime traffic, and the effects of large predators. In addition, the composition of benthic<br />

communities at any s<strong>in</strong>gle location can be a function of seasonal or <strong>in</strong>ter-annual changes <strong>in</strong> larval<br />

recruitment, availability of food, proximity to adult brood stock, predation, and seasonal<br />

differences <strong>in</strong> temperature, freshwater runoff, current velocity and physical disturbances.<br />

In this survey of central <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>, samples were collected <strong>in</strong> the deep waters of the central<br />

bas<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong> protected waters of shallow embayments and coves, <strong>in</strong> scoured channels with strong<br />

tidal currents, and <strong>in</strong> the lower reaches of a highly <strong>in</strong>dustrialized river. As a result of these major<br />

differences <strong>in</strong> habitat, the abundance, diversity, and composition of benthic communities would<br />

be expected to differ considerably from place to place.<br />

Analyses of the benthic macro<strong>in</strong>fauna <strong>in</strong> the central <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> survey <strong>in</strong>dicated that the vast<br />

majority of samples were populated by abundant and diverse <strong>in</strong>faunal assemblages. The numbers<br />

of species and organisms varied considerably among sampl<strong>in</strong>g locations, <strong>in</strong>dicative of the natural<br />

degree of variability <strong>in</strong> abundance, community structure, and diversity among benthic samples <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong>. Calculated <strong>in</strong>dices of evenness and dom<strong>in</strong>ance showed variability equal to that <strong>for</strong><br />

species counts and abundance.<br />

With huge ranges <strong>in</strong> abundance, species composition, and diversity as a result of natural<br />

environmental factors, it is difficult to discern the differences between degraded and un-degraded<br />

(or "healthy") benthic assemblages. Some benthic assemblages may have relatively low species<br />

richness and total abundance as a result of the effects of natural environmental factors. There<br />

were a number of stations <strong>in</strong> which the benthos was very abundant and diverse despite the<br />

presence of high chemical concentrations and high toxicity.<br />

Both Long (1989) and Chapman (1 996) provided recommendations <strong>for</strong> graphical and tabular<br />

presentations of data from the <strong>Sediment</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Triad (i.e., measures of chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation,<br />

toxicity, and benthic community structure). The triad of measures was offered as an approach <strong>for</strong><br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g a weight-of-evidence to classify the relative quality of sediments (Long, 1989).<br />

Chapman (1 996) later suggested that locations with chemical concentrations greater than effects-<br />

based guidel<strong>in</strong>es or criteria, and evidence of acute toxicity <strong>in</strong> laboratory tests (such as with the<br />

amphipod survival bioassays), and alterations to resident <strong>in</strong>faunal communities constituted<br />

"strong evidence of pollution-<strong>in</strong>duced degradation". In contrast, he suggested that there was<br />

"strong evidence aga<strong>in</strong>st pollution-<strong>in</strong>duced degradation" at sites lack<strong>in</strong>g contam<strong>in</strong>ation, toxicity,<br />

and benthic alterations. Several other permutations were described <strong>in</strong> which mixed or conflict<strong>in</strong>g<br />

results were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. In some cases, sediments could appear to be contam<strong>in</strong>ated, but not toxic,<br />

either with or without alterations to the benthos, or sediments were not contam<strong>in</strong>ated with<br />

measured substances, but, nevertheless, were toxic, either with or without benthic alterations.<br />

Plausible explanations were offered <strong>for</strong> benthic "alterations" at non-contam<strong>in</strong>ated and/or non-<br />

toxic locations possibly attributable to natural factors, such as those identified above.<br />

Page 6 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!