Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...
Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...
Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Precautions described above were taken to avoid contam<strong>in</strong>ation of the samples from eng<strong>in</strong>e<br />
exhaust, atmospheric particulates, and ra<strong>in</strong>. A double volume sample was collected at five<br />
stations <strong>for</strong> duplicate chemical analyses. All samples were labeled and double-checked <strong>for</strong><br />
station, stratum, and sample codes; sampl<strong>in</strong>g date; sampl<strong>in</strong>g time; and type of analysis to be<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med.<br />
Samples <strong>for</strong> chemical and toxicity tests were stored on deck <strong>in</strong> sealed conta<strong>in</strong>ers placed <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>sulated coolers filled with ice. These samples were off-loaded from the research vessel every<br />
1-3 days, and transported to the walk-<strong>in</strong> refrigerator at Ecology HQ build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Olympia. They<br />
were held there at 4OC until shipped on ice to either the NOAA contractors <strong>for</strong> toxicity tests or<br />
the Manchester Environmental Laboratory <strong>for</strong> chemical analyses by overnight courier. Cha<strong>in</strong> of<br />
custody <strong>for</strong>ms accon~panied all sample shipments. After a m<strong>in</strong>imum of 24 hours follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
collection and fixation, the benthic samples were rescreened (i.e., removed from <strong>for</strong>mal<strong>in</strong>) and<br />
exchanged <strong>in</strong>to 70% ethanol.<br />
Laboratory Analyses<br />
Toxicity Test<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Multiple toxicity tests were per<strong>for</strong>med on aliquots of each sample to provide a weight of<br />
evidence. Tests were selected <strong>for</strong> which there were widely accepted protocols that would<br />
represent the toxicological conditions with<strong>in</strong> different phases (partitions) of the sediments. The<br />
tests <strong>in</strong>cluded those <strong>for</strong> amphipod survival <strong>in</strong> solid-phase (bulk) sediments, sea urch<strong>in</strong><br />
fertilization success <strong>in</strong> pore waters, and microbial biolum<strong>in</strong>escence activity and cytochrome P45C<br />
HRGS <strong>in</strong>duction <strong>in</strong> an organic solvent extract. Test endpo<strong>in</strong>ts, there<strong>for</strong>e, ranged from survival to<br />
level of physiological activity.<br />
Amphipod Survival - Solid Phase<br />
The amphipod tests are the most widely and frequently used assays <strong>in</strong> sediment evaluations<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med <strong>in</strong> North America. They are per<strong>for</strong>med with adult crustaceans exposed to relatively<br />
unaltered bulk sediments. Ampelisca abdita has shown relatively little sensitivity to nuisance<br />
factors such as gra<strong>in</strong> size, ammonia, and organic carbon <strong>in</strong> previous surveys. In surveys<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med by the NS&T Program (Long et al., 1996), this test has provided wide ranges <strong>in</strong><br />
responses among samples, strong statistical associations with elevated toxicant levels, and small<br />
with<strong>in</strong>-sample variability.<br />
Anzpelisca abdita is a euryhal<strong>in</strong>e benthic amphipod that ranges from Newfoundland to south-<br />
central Florida, and along the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Also, it is abundant <strong>in</strong> San Francisco Bay<br />
along the Pacific coast. The amphipod test with A. abdita has been rout<strong>in</strong>ely used <strong>for</strong> sediment<br />
toxicity tests <strong>in</strong> support of numerous EPA programs, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the Environmental Monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and Assessment Program (EMAP) <strong>in</strong> the Virg<strong>in</strong>ian, Louisianian, Cali<strong>for</strong>nian, and Carol<strong>in</strong>ian<br />
prov<strong>in</strong>ces (Schimmel et al., 1994).<br />
Amphipod survival tests were conducted by Science Applications International Corporation<br />
(SAIC), <strong>in</strong> Narragansett, R.I. All tests were <strong>in</strong>itiated with<strong>in</strong> 10 days of the date samples were<br />
collected. Samples were shipped by overnight courier <strong>in</strong> one-gallon high-density polyethylene<br />
Page 10