Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...
Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...
Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Summary<br />
The majority of compounds <strong>for</strong> which chemical analyses were conducted on the 100 sediment<br />
samples from central <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> were measured at levels below state criteria and national<br />
guidel<strong>in</strong>es (i.e., ERM, SQS, and CSL values). Eleven stations, located <strong>in</strong> Port Townsend,<br />
Possession <strong>Sound</strong>, the central bas<strong>in</strong>, the Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge bas<strong>in</strong>, and East Passage, all exceeded<br />
Wash<strong>in</strong>gton State SQS and CSL levels <strong>for</strong> the compound 4-methylphenol. Three stations, one<br />
west of Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge Island and two <strong>in</strong> Dyes Inlet, exceeded state criteria <strong>for</strong> benzyl alcohol. One<br />
of these, <strong>in</strong> Dyes Inlet, also exceeded state criteria <strong>for</strong> mercury. The six stations <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>clair Inlet<br />
also exceeded SQS and CSL levels <strong>for</strong> mercury, while five of the six also exceeded the ERM<br />
level <strong>for</strong> mercury. <strong>Sediment</strong> samples collected at stations located <strong>in</strong> Elliott Bay and the<br />
Duwamish River clearly showed an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number of compounds exceed<strong>in</strong>g state criteria<br />
and national guidel<strong>in</strong>es from outer to <strong>in</strong>ner Elliott Bay, and <strong>in</strong>to the Duwamish River. The suites<br />
of compounds exceed<strong>in</strong>g criteria differed between the shorel<strong>in</strong>elmid-Elliott Bay samples and<br />
those collected around Harbor Island and further up the Duwamish River, reflect<strong>in</strong>g differ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sources of contam<strong>in</strong>ation. In general, spatial patterns of chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>dicated that<br />
the highest chemical concentrations <strong>in</strong>variably occurred <strong>in</strong> samples collected <strong>in</strong><br />
urbanl<strong>in</strong>dustrialized embayments, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Elliott Bay, S<strong>in</strong>clair Inlet, Dyes Inlet, and Port<br />
Townsend. Often, these samples conta<strong>in</strong>ed chemicals at concentrations previously observed to<br />
be associated with acute toxicity and other biological effects. Concentrations generally decreased<br />
steadily away from these embayments and were lowest <strong>in</strong> Admiralty Inlet, Possession <strong>Sound</strong>,<br />
Rich Passage, Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge Bas<strong>in</strong>, and most of the central bas<strong>in</strong>.<br />
Spatial Extent of Chemical Contam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
Table 14 summarizes the numbers of samples <strong>in</strong> which ERM, SQS, and CSL concentrations were<br />
exceeded and an estimate of the spatial extent of chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation (expressed as the<br />
percentage of the total survey area these samples represent) <strong>for</strong> all compounds with chemical<br />
guidel<strong>in</strong>es. For some compounds, the data were qualified as "undetected" at method quantitation<br />
limits that exceeded the chemical guidel<strong>in</strong>e values. hi these cases, the spatial extent of chemical<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ation was recalculated after omitt<strong>in</strong>g the data that were so qualified (shown as ">QL<br />
only" on Table 14).<br />
Among the trace metals, the concentration of arsenic exceeded ERM, SQS, and CSL values at<br />
station 197, West Harbor Island (0.04% of the study area). The level of z<strong>in</strong>c also exceeded the<br />
ERM value at this station. Mercury exceeded all three sets of criteria <strong>in</strong> sediment collected from<br />
9 to 14 stations <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>clair and Dyes Inlets, and <strong>in</strong> Elliott Bay, represent<strong>in</strong>g 1.1 (ERM), 2.0<br />
(SQS), and 1.9% (CSL) of the study area. The ERM value <strong>for</strong> nickel was exceeded <strong>in</strong> four<br />
samples. As stated earlier, however, Long et al. (1995) suggested that there was a limited degree<br />
of reliability <strong>in</strong> this value. For all trace metals (exclud<strong>in</strong>g nickel), there are a total of 10 (ERM),<br />
15 (SQS), and 13 (CSL) samples exceed<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>es or criteria levels, encompass<strong>in</strong>g a total of<br />
2.5,2.0, and 1.9%, respectively, of the total study area.<br />
Many of the low and high molecular weight polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (LPAH and<br />
HPAH) were found at concentrations that exceeded the guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> samples from Elliott Bay,<br />
West Harbor Island, and the Duwamish River. As noted earlier, different suites of PAHs<br />
Page 34