30.01.2013 Views

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

Sediment Quality in Puget Sound Year 2 - Center for Coastal ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Summary<br />

The majority of compounds <strong>for</strong> which chemical analyses were conducted on the 100 sediment<br />

samples from central <strong>Puget</strong> <strong>Sound</strong> were measured at levels below state criteria and national<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es (i.e., ERM, SQS, and CSL values). Eleven stations, located <strong>in</strong> Port Townsend,<br />

Possession <strong>Sound</strong>, the central bas<strong>in</strong>, the Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge bas<strong>in</strong>, and East Passage, all exceeded<br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton State SQS and CSL levels <strong>for</strong> the compound 4-methylphenol. Three stations, one<br />

west of Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge Island and two <strong>in</strong> Dyes Inlet, exceeded state criteria <strong>for</strong> benzyl alcohol. One<br />

of these, <strong>in</strong> Dyes Inlet, also exceeded state criteria <strong>for</strong> mercury. The six stations <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>clair Inlet<br />

also exceeded SQS and CSL levels <strong>for</strong> mercury, while five of the six also exceeded the ERM<br />

level <strong>for</strong> mercury. <strong>Sediment</strong> samples collected at stations located <strong>in</strong> Elliott Bay and the<br />

Duwamish River clearly showed an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number of compounds exceed<strong>in</strong>g state criteria<br />

and national guidel<strong>in</strong>es from outer to <strong>in</strong>ner Elliott Bay, and <strong>in</strong>to the Duwamish River. The suites<br />

of compounds exceed<strong>in</strong>g criteria differed between the shorel<strong>in</strong>elmid-Elliott Bay samples and<br />

those collected around Harbor Island and further up the Duwamish River, reflect<strong>in</strong>g differ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sources of contam<strong>in</strong>ation. In general, spatial patterns of chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>dicated that<br />

the highest chemical concentrations <strong>in</strong>variably occurred <strong>in</strong> samples collected <strong>in</strong><br />

urbanl<strong>in</strong>dustrialized embayments, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Elliott Bay, S<strong>in</strong>clair Inlet, Dyes Inlet, and Port<br />

Townsend. Often, these samples conta<strong>in</strong>ed chemicals at concentrations previously observed to<br />

be associated with acute toxicity and other biological effects. Concentrations generally decreased<br />

steadily away from these embayments and were lowest <strong>in</strong> Admiralty Inlet, Possession <strong>Sound</strong>,<br />

Rich Passage, Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge Bas<strong>in</strong>, and most of the central bas<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Spatial Extent of Chemical Contam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Table 14 summarizes the numbers of samples <strong>in</strong> which ERM, SQS, and CSL concentrations were<br />

exceeded and an estimate of the spatial extent of chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation (expressed as the<br />

percentage of the total survey area these samples represent) <strong>for</strong> all compounds with chemical<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es. For some compounds, the data were qualified as "undetected" at method quantitation<br />

limits that exceeded the chemical guidel<strong>in</strong>e values. hi these cases, the spatial extent of chemical<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ation was recalculated after omitt<strong>in</strong>g the data that were so qualified (shown as ">QL<br />

only" on Table 14).<br />

Among the trace metals, the concentration of arsenic exceeded ERM, SQS, and CSL values at<br />

station 197, West Harbor Island (0.04% of the study area). The level of z<strong>in</strong>c also exceeded the<br />

ERM value at this station. Mercury exceeded all three sets of criteria <strong>in</strong> sediment collected from<br />

9 to 14 stations <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>clair and Dyes Inlets, and <strong>in</strong> Elliott Bay, represent<strong>in</strong>g 1.1 (ERM), 2.0<br />

(SQS), and 1.9% (CSL) of the study area. The ERM value <strong>for</strong> nickel was exceeded <strong>in</strong> four<br />

samples. As stated earlier, however, Long et al. (1995) suggested that there was a limited degree<br />

of reliability <strong>in</strong> this value. For all trace metals (exclud<strong>in</strong>g nickel), there are a total of 10 (ERM),<br />

15 (SQS), and 13 (CSL) samples exceed<strong>in</strong>g guidel<strong>in</strong>es or criteria levels, encompass<strong>in</strong>g a total of<br />

2.5,2.0, and 1.9%, respectively, of the total study area.<br />

Many of the low and high molecular weight polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (LPAH and<br />

HPAH) were found at concentrations that exceeded the guidel<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> samples from Elliott Bay,<br />

West Harbor Island, and the Duwamish River. As noted earlier, different suites of PAHs<br />

Page 34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!