D10: Impact of Contaminants - Hydromod
D10: Impact of Contaminants - Hydromod
D10: Impact of Contaminants - Hydromod
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Integrated Water Resource Management for Important Deep European Lakes and their Catchment Areas<br />
EUROLAKES<br />
<strong>D10</strong>: <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Contaminants</strong><br />
FP5_Contract No.: EVK1-CT1999-00004<br />
Version: 4.0<br />
Date: 25/07/01<br />
File: <strong>D10</strong>-vers.4.0.doc<br />
Page 10 <strong>of</strong> 136<br />
The communication COM (1999) 706 final points at the financing <strong>of</strong> several research<br />
works aimed at the development and validation <strong>of</strong> test methods for the identification <strong>of</strong><br />
endocrine disrupters by the Commission. Last but not least there is also a need to develop<br />
and validate appropriate environmental monitoring tools. Existing Community<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> law on environmental and human health aspects <strong>of</strong> chemicals are based<br />
on a three-stage approach. This approach is also described in COM (1999) 706 final. In<br />
the first stage, the hazard identification, a substance's inherent capacity to cause adverse<br />
effects on human health and the environment is identified, on the basis <strong>of</strong> the intrinsic<br />
properties <strong>of</strong> a substance. The second stage is a risk assessment where the<br />
risks in conjunction with the exposition <strong>of</strong> a chemical substance are evaluated. In the<br />
third stage, the risk management, strategies for the management <strong>of</strong> risks are developed.<br />
The directives being the basis for the hazard identification, the risk assessment<br />
and the risk management are listed in Annex I <strong>of</strong> COM (1999) 706 final.<br />
The Water Framework Directive Concerning the EDC Problem<br />
It is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this chapter to give a comprehensive view <strong>of</strong> the WFD and the<br />
authors have attempted to identify and focus on the key issues <strong>of</strong> the WFD that are related<br />
to chemicals, analyse its provisions, point out weaknesses and ambiguities and<br />
derive from them a number <strong>of</strong> political options which are crucial for the improvement <strong>of</strong><br />
European waters.<br />
In September 2000, after a decade <strong>of</strong> political struggle, the European Parliament and<br />
Council adopted the Water Framework Directive (WFD). There is no doubt that this new<br />
framework for EU water legislation is a most complex package <strong>of</strong> objectives, instruments<br />
and obligations. Two <strong>of</strong> the main goals <strong>of</strong> the Water Framework Directive are the<br />
protection and improvement <strong>of</strong> the aquatic environment and the contribution to sustainable,<br />
balanced and equitable water use. The Directive should also contribute to<br />
achieving the objectives <strong>of</strong> relevant international agreements (e.g. OSPAR,<br />
BARCELONA and HELCOM). This is important since some <strong>of</strong> the objectives laid down<br />
by these international agreements are far-reaching and might ask for more stringent<br />
measures than those currently required under the WFD. New instruments are introduced<br />
in the EU water policy to protect and improve all European waters: an ecological<br />
and holistic water status assessment approach; river basin planning; a strategy for<br />
elimination <strong>of</strong> pollution by dangerous substances; public information and consultation<br />
and finally, financial instruments. Despite these important additions to EU water policy<br />
instruments, a number <strong>of</strong> problems are emerging from the directive. They need to be<br />
dealt with as soon as possible to achieve clear and consistently positive results for EU<br />
waters.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the main weaknesses identified are:<br />
- complicated and wide-ranging exemption and derogation conditions for the environmental<br />
objectives for ‘heavily modified’ waters or for new physical modifications<br />
for example;