02.02.2013 Views

D10: Impact of Contaminants - Hydromod

D10: Impact of Contaminants - Hydromod

D10: Impact of Contaminants - Hydromod

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Integrated Water Resource Management for Important Deep European Lakes and their Catchment Areas<br />

EUROLAKES<br />

<strong>D10</strong>: <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Contaminants</strong><br />

FP5_Contract No.: EVK1-CT1999-00004<br />

Version: 4.0<br />

Date: 25/07/01<br />

File: <strong>D10</strong>-vers.4.0.doc<br />

Page 13 <strong>of</strong> 136<br />

The First WFD Priority List<br />

A proposal for a first priority list has been tabled by the Commission in February 2000<br />

(COM (2000) 47 final/2 - 2000/0035 (COD)). It consists <strong>of</strong> 32 substances selected as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> a simplified risk-based procedure (Article 16.2) with the so-called COMMPS<br />

procedure, which takes account inter alia <strong>of</strong> monitoring results and intrinsic substance<br />

properties. 32 is an arbitrary number and is intended to reflect the Commission’s limited<br />

administrative potential. It does not indicate that there are no more than 32 substances<br />

<strong>of</strong> concern, but that the list <strong>of</strong> substances should be manageable, adding some new<br />

ones every four years. Nevertheless, a number <strong>of</strong> shortcomings can be reported, requiring<br />

improvements under COMMPS for its future application. For example, a great<br />

number <strong>of</strong> substances for which no data were available at Community level from the<br />

national monitoring programmes were left out. This situation applies to:<br />

- about 60% <strong>of</strong> pesticides which are currently in use;<br />

- all industrial chemicals which no company in the EU produces or imports in<br />

quantities <strong>of</strong> over. 1,000 tonnes per year. This concerns about 8,000 to 10,000<br />

substances for which appropriate data were not available in the IUCLID databank<br />

when the COMMPS procedure was carried out;<br />

- industrial chemicals produced or imported by fewer than four undertakings in the<br />

EU in quantities superior to 1,000 tonnes per year (confidentiality <strong>of</strong> market<br />

data).<br />

As a consequence, the COMMPS procedure covered only 95 substances on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> monitoring data and 123 substances on the basis <strong>of</strong> modelling data.<br />

Amongst the 32 WFD priority substances, 3 are classified as UNECE POPs, 13 as<br />

hazardous by OSPAR, which means that they are either POP-like substances or highly<br />

toxic, persistent and bioaccumulative. Another 16 are selected under OSPAR 1998 and<br />

2000 for priority action for a cessation <strong>of</strong> their releases by 2020. It should be very clear<br />

that the priority substances that fulfil one <strong>of</strong> these selections should be identified as priority<br />

hazardous substances. The Community has internationally committed itself to<br />

cease emissions <strong>of</strong> these substances by 2020. 21 priority substances are in one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

above-mentioned ‘hazardous’ categories and most <strong>of</strong> them are on different lists established<br />

in Community legislation on dangerous/hazardous substances. At least these 21<br />

substances should be identified as priority hazardous substances. The Parliament’s<br />

rapporteur has pointed out that a further 7 substances prioritised by OSPAR in 2000<br />

should be added to the WFD priority list, thus totalling 39 priority substances, 28 <strong>of</strong><br />

which are priority hazardous substances.<br />

Repeal <strong>of</strong> Existing Standards<br />

The Dangerous Substances Directive (76/464/EEC) will be repealed 13 years after the<br />

date <strong>of</strong> entry into force <strong>of</strong> the WFD. Article 22(6) states that the quality standards established<br />

under the Water Framework Directive shall be at least as stringent as those<br />

required for implementation <strong>of</strong> the Dangerous Substances Directive. It is unclear, however,<br />

whether this clause guarantees an identical level <strong>of</strong> water protection under the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!