02.02.2013 Views

D10: Impact of Contaminants - Hydromod

D10: Impact of Contaminants - Hydromod

D10: Impact of Contaminants - Hydromod

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Integrated Water Resource Management for Important Deep European Lakes and their Catchment Areas<br />

EUROLAKES<br />

<strong>D10</strong>: <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Contaminants</strong><br />

FP5_Contract No.: EVK1-CT1999-00004<br />

Version: 4.0<br />

Date: 25/07/01<br />

File: <strong>D10</strong>-vers.4.0.doc<br />

Page 87 <strong>of</strong> 136<br />

and farm lands. Some <strong>of</strong> the local sewage treatment plants discharge excellent quality<br />

effluents but others suffer from inadequate maintenance or erratic loading. Luss village<br />

and Luss campsite are now served by a sewage treatment plant, having previously<br />

used individual septic tanks. At other recreational sites septic tanks are provided which<br />

should have sufficient capacity to receive the sewage from a full campsite or caravan<br />

park. On the loch itself there are many cruising boats fitted with chemical toilets [SEPA<br />

200c].<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> potential damaging activities within the Loch Lomond catchment have<br />

been identified by SEPA as threatening the lake's good water quality status. These activities<br />

are as follows:<br />

— Sewage effluents leading to increased nutrient and organic loading,<br />

— Farming resulting in increased use <strong>of</strong> fertilisers, pesticides, herbicides and problems<br />

associated with leakage from silage and slurry tanks,<br />

— Afforestation causing increases in suspended soils and turbidity, and the use <strong>of</strong><br />

fertilisers and pesticides.<br />

Sewage, urban and agricultural run-<strong>of</strong>f and direct contamination through livestock watering<br />

can compromise water quality. The main potential sources <strong>of</strong> organic and toxic<br />

pollution within the Loch Lomond catchment include agriculture (sheep dip, silage,<br />

slurry, pesticides and organic fertilisers), forestry (organic fertilisers, herbicides and fuel<br />

spillage), recreation (disposal <strong>of</strong> chemical toilet contents, hydrocarbon pollution from<br />

boat exhausts and fuel spillage) and waste disposal. Because there is very little industry<br />

within the catchment pollution by industrial chemicals is less <strong>of</strong> a problem [SEPA].<br />

Sheep farming is widely spread in the catchment area <strong>of</strong> Loch Lomond. As mentioned<br />

above chemical products are used to control a range <strong>of</strong> ectoparasites, such as scab<br />

and blowfly. The application takes place by dipping the sheep in a lotion including these<br />

chemicals. All sheep dips are toxic to aquatic life and even tiny amounts <strong>of</strong> dip can affect<br />

the environment. A cup <strong>of</strong> cypermethrin, the most commonly used pyrethroid dip<br />

has the potential to kill fish and insects over several kilometres in a sizeable watercourse<br />

[SEPA 1997]. In [SEPA 2000b] it is mentioned that sheep dip continues to pose<br />

a serious chronic pollution in some upland areas throughout Scotland, particularly<br />

through the use <strong>of</strong> synthetic phyrethroid dips which are highly toxic to aquatic life. Residues<br />

<strong>of</strong> sheep dip chemicals may also be discharged to rivers via sewage treatment<br />

plants after processing <strong>of</strong> fleeces and skins by the textile industry [SEPA 1999c], although<br />

no such processing occurs within the Loch Lomond catchment.<br />

In a press release <strong>of</strong> June 2000 [SEPA 2000a] SEPA stresses that sub-standard dipping<br />

facilities and poor disposal practices pose a significant environmental risk and a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> pollution incidents over the past few months have highlighted these dangers<br />

with the watercourses affected sometimes taking a long time to fully recover. The article<br />

continues that under the Groundwater Regulations 1998, it is illegal to intentionally dispose<br />

<strong>of</strong> waste sheep dip from static or mobile dippers, shower or jetters to land without<br />

an Authorisation from SEPA.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!