11.02.2013 Views

Upscaling and Inverse Modeling of Groundwater Flow and Mass ...

Upscaling and Inverse Modeling of Groundwater Flow and Mass ...

Upscaling and Inverse Modeling of Groundwater Flow and Mass ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 2. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THREE- . . . 35<br />

intricate spatial variability, carefully choosing the upscaling technique is<br />

very important. The hydraulic conductivity full tensors obtained using<br />

the interblock-centered Laplacian-with-skin upscaling technique with a<br />

skin size <strong>of</strong> half block performs best among the different upscaling methods<br />

analyzed, although, at the MADE site, the superiority <strong>of</strong> the fulltensor<br />

upscaling over diagonal tensors upscaling is very limited. This<br />

can be explained by the fact that the principal directions <strong>of</strong> hydraulic<br />

conductivity are parallel with the reference axes.<br />

2. A non-uniform coarsening focused in the refinement <strong>of</strong> the regions through<br />

which the solute plume travels can further improve the results.<br />

3. <strong>Modeling</strong> <strong>of</strong> flow <strong>and</strong> transport at the MADE site has been the object <strong>of</strong><br />

debate for many years, <strong>and</strong> many complex transport models have been<br />

proposed to reproduce the plume spreading observed. We show that the<br />

advection-dispersion model can be used on a coarse model to explain<br />

the plume migration in the highly heterogeneous MADE site if careful<br />

modeling/upscaling <strong>of</strong> the flow field is performed, as long as the block<br />

size remains smaller than the correlation ranges <strong>of</strong> the underlying fine<br />

scale conductivities.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!