ReferencesAn<strong>de</strong>rson JR (1982), “Acquisition of cognitive skill”, Psychological review, 84/4:369-406Argote L. and Ingram P. (2000), “Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage of firms”, Organ. BehaviorHuman Decision Processes, 82:150-169.Bartol, K.M., Srivastava, A., 2002. Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journalof Lea<strong>de</strong>rship and Organization Studies, 9/1:64–76.Bedward D.; Jankowicz D.; Rexworthy C. (2003), “East meets West: a case example of knowledge transfer”, HumanResource Development International, 6/4:527-545Bereiter and Scardamalia (1993), Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry Into the Nature and Implications of Expertise,Open Court Publishing CompanyBrown J. S. and Duguid P. (1991), “Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view ofworking, learning, and innovation”, Organization Science, 2/1:40-57.Burgess D. (2005), “What Motivates Employees to Transfer Knowledge Outsi<strong>de</strong> Their Work Unit”, Journal of BusinessCommunication, 42/4:324-348.Chesbrough H. W. and Teece D.J. (1996), “When is Virtual Virtuous: Organizing for Innovation”, Harvard BusinessReview, Jan.-Feb:65-73Collins H (2007), “Bicycling on the Moon: Collective Tacit Knowledge and Somatic-Limit Tacit Knowledge”,Organization Studies, 28/2:257-262.Deci E.L. (1975), Intrinsic Motivation, Plenum Press, New York, US.Dermer J. (1975), “The Interrelationship of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation”, Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Management Journal,18/1:125-129.Dreyfus, H. L and S E Dreyfus (2005) ‘Peripheral vision: Expertise in Real World Contexts’, Organization Studies,25/5:779-792.Dyer JH. And Nobeoka K. (2000), “Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyotacase”, Strategic Management Journal, 21/3:345-367Eisenhardt, K M and M E Graebner (2007) ’Theory Building from Cases: Opportunites and Challenges’ Aca<strong>de</strong>my ofManagement Journal Vol. 50, No. 1, 25–32.Eisenhardt KM and Santos FM (2002), “Knowledge-based view: A new theory of strategy”, in, AM Pettigrew, H Thomas,R Whittington, “Handbook of strategy and management”, 1st ed, 139-164, London, Sage PublicationsEricsson K. A. and Lehmann A. C. (1996), “Expert and exceptional performance: evi<strong>de</strong>nce on maximal adaptations ontask constraints”, Annual Review of Psychology, 47: 273-305Gagné M., & Deci E. L. (2005), “Self-<strong>de</strong>termination theory and work motivation”, Journal of Organizational Behavior”,26, 331-362Greeno J. S. and Simon, H. A. (1988), “Problem solving and reasoning”, In R. C. Atkinson (Ed.), Steven’s handbook ofexperimental psychology, 2nd ed.: 589-639. New York: WileyHansen M.T. (1999), “The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across OrganizationSubunits”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44/1: 82-111.Hinds P. J., Patterson M. and Pfeffer J. (2001), “Bothered by Abstraction: The Effect of Expertise on Knowledge Transferand Subsequent Novice Performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86/6:1232-1243.Hurt M and Hurt, S (2005), “Transfer of managerial practices by French food retailers to operations in Poland”,Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Management Executive, 19/2:36-49Husted, K. and Michailova, S. (2002), “Diagnosing and fighting knowledge sharing hostility”,Organizational Dynamics,31/1:60-73.Ipe, M (2003) “Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework”, Human Resource DevelopmentReview, 2:337.Jankowicz A. D. (1999), “Planting a Paradigm in Central Europe. Do We Graft, or Must We Breed the RootstockAnew?”, Management Learning, 30/3:281-299Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C.Y., Wei, K.-K., (2005), ”Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: Anempirical investigation”, MIS Quarterly 29/1:113–143.CAHIER<strong>de</strong>RECHERCHE N°1431
Lave J, Wenger E (1991), Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, New York: Cambridge University Press,1991Levin DZ and Cross R (2004), “The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effectiveknowledge transfer”, Management Science, 50/11:1477-1490Mandl, H., Gruber, H. & Renkl, A. (1996) ”Communities of practice toward expertise: social foundation of universityinstruction” In: P.B. Baltes & U.M. Staudinger (eds). Interactive minds. Life-Span Perspectives on the Social Foundationof Cognition. Cambridge University Press.Michailova S. and Hutchings K. (2006), ”National Cultural Influences on Knowledge Sharing: A Comparison of Chinaand Russia”, Journal of Management Studies, 43/3:383-405Nonaka I (1994), ”A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, Organization Science, 5:14-37Osterloh M. (2007), “Human Resources Management and Knowledge Creation”, in: Ichijo, Kazuo, and Ikujiro Nonaka,eds. Knowledge Creation and Management : New Challenges for Managers. Oxford University Press,Osterloh M. and Frey B. (2000), “Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms”, Organization Science,11/5:538-550.Osterloh M., Frost J. and Frey B. (2002), “The Dynamics of Motivation in Organizational Forms”, International Journalof the Economics of Business, 9/1: 61-77.Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday.Reed, R. and DeFilippi, R.J. (1990), “Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage”,Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Management Review, 15/1:88–102.Rumelt, RP., Schen<strong>de</strong>l D. and Teece, DJ. (1991), “Strategic management and economics”. Strategic ManagementJournal, 12:5—29.Schatzki, T (2003) “A New Societist Social Ontology”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp: 174-202.Smith J. A. (1991) The i<strong>de</strong>a brokers. Think tanks and the rise of the new policy elite, New York: Free press.Simonin B. (1999), “Ambiguity and the Process of Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances”, Strategic ManagementJournal, 20/7:595–623.Smith, J. A. 1991. The i<strong>de</strong>a of brokers. Think tanks and the rise of the new policy elite, New York: Free press.Sternberg, R.J., R.K. Wagner, W.M. Williams, and J.A. Horvath (1995). «Testing Common Sense», American Psychologist,50/11.Szulanski G. (1996), “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm”,Strategic Management Journal, 17, Special Issue Winter, pp. 27–43.Tanaka JW., Curran T., Sheinberg DL. (2005), “The Training and Transfer of Real-World Perceptual Expertise”,Psychological Science, 16/2:145-151Teigland, R and M Wasko (2009) ‘Knowledge transfer in MNCs: Examining how intrinsic motivations and knowledgesourcing impact individual centrality and performance’ Journal of International Management, 15:15–31.Thomas-Hunt M.C., Og<strong>de</strong>n T.Y., Neale M.A. (2003), “Who’s really sharing? Effects of social and expert status onknowledge exchange within groups”, Management Science, 49/4:464-477Tissen, R., Andriesson, D., & Deprez, L. F. (1998). Value-based knowledge management: Creating the 21st centurycompany: Knowledge intensive, people rich. Amsterdam: Addison-Wesley Longman.Wenger, E., McDermott, R., and Sny<strong>de</strong>r, W.M. (2002), Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Gui<strong>de</strong> to ManagingKnowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Winter, S. (1987), “Knowledge and competence as strategic assets”.In D.J. Teece, ed. The Competitive Challenge:Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, 159-184.Zahra SA and G George (2002), “Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension”, Aca<strong>de</strong>my ofManagement Review, 27/2;185-203Zan<strong>de</strong>r U. and Kogut, B. (1995), “Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of OrganizationalCapabilities”, Organization Science, 6/1:76–92.32CAHIER<strong>de</strong>RECHERCHE N°14
- Page 1 and 2: CAHIERdeRECHERCHE N°14Institut de
- Page 4: SommaireComment classer les actionn
- Page 7 and 8: RésuméA l’origine, la théorie
- Page 9 and 10: influence via un contrôle externe
- Page 12 and 13: La très grande richesse des travau
- Page 14 and 15: a prévalu pendant de nombreuses an
- Page 16 and 17: Lorsque l’actionnariat a majorita
- Page 18 and 19: ConclusionAinsi, il existe différe
- Page 20 and 21: Huynh, Q. T. (2009), L’influence
- Page 22 and 23: Intrinsic Motivation,Tacit Knowledg
- Page 24 and 25: IntroductionAlthough the importance
- Page 26 and 27: to direct the ability to balance th
- Page 28 and 29: The empirical material is elicited
- Page 30 and 31: on after I am gone. It is of no use
- Page 34 and 35: CAHIERdeRECHERCHE N°1433
- Page 36 and 37: University Corporate Governancein t
- Page 38 and 39: of expertise, workload, unpaid time
- Page 40 and 41: 3. Scenario PlanningUncertainty is
- Page 42 and 43: 6. Risk GovernanceRisk governance i
- Page 44 and 45: ReferencesBaird, J. (2007) ‘Takin
- Page 46 and 47: CAHIERdeRECHERCHE N°1445
- Page 48 and 49: Une analyse de la gestionde la perf
- Page 50 and 51: I. Les outils de gestion de la perf
- Page 52 and 53: définissant les finalités des act
- Page 54 and 55: Pour trois-quarts des collectivité
- Page 56 and 57: Au-delà de leur relative nouveaut
- Page 58 and 59: 2. Une mise en œuvre opérationnel
- Page 60 and 61: Or, une démarche de performance se
- Page 62 and 63: 3. L’adaptation du système local
- Page 64 and 65: esponsabilisation et d’évaluatio
- Page 66 and 67: I. NONAKA, “A dynamic theory of o
- Page 68: PROGRAMME GRANDE ÉCOLE, GRADE MAST