07.07.2015 Views

Medicina

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I ng l es<br />

Investing in Brazil's infrastructure<br />

The road forsaken<br />

Brazll's infrastructure needs are huge. So ls the job of<br />

attractlng private capital<br />

Aug 11th 2012 | SANTOS | from the print edition<br />

1 . IF MITT ROMNEY, America's Republican presidential<br />

candidate, doubted London's preparedness<br />

for the 2012 Olympics, what must he think about Brazil's?<br />

'lhe 2016 Olympics and 2014 football World Cup will<br />

happen in a country where only 14% of roads are paved.<br />

The World Economic Forum ranks Brazil's quality of<br />

infrastructure 104th out of 142 countries surveyed, behind<br />

China (69th), India (86th) and Russia (100th). On a recent<br />

visit to Santos, Brazil's largest port, your correspondent<br />

watched men clean up the remains of a ship that had<br />

exploded carrying chemicals-in the 19705.<br />

2 . In theory, Brazil's urgent infrastructure needs should<br />

provide rich pickings for investors. From 2011-14<br />

the government will spend 163 billion reais ($80 billion),<br />

or 1% of GDP a year, on infrastructure as part of its<br />

"growth acceleration" programme. That is not enough,<br />

says Arthur Carvalho of Morgan Stanley. According to a<br />

2010 report by the bank, Brazil would need to spend 6-8%<br />

of GDP annually to catch up with South Korea in 20 years<br />

and 4% per year to catch up with Chile.<br />

3 . But there are plenty of reasons to think that private<br />

capital will not rush to ll the gap. Infrastructure<br />

projects require lots of debt, but long-term nancing in<br />

reais is extremely expensive. Loans are available from<br />

BNDES, Brazil's giant national development bank, at a<br />

more affordable rate, but lts activities have the effect of<br />

crowding out other lenders. The Brazilian government is<br />

trying to encourage projects to use tax-free infrastructure<br />

bonds, but so far there has not been a successful issuance.<br />

Exactly who will buy these bonds is unclear since<br />

Brazilian investors can get a comparable yield without<br />

taking on so<br />

much risk.<br />

4 . There is a lot of risk to go round. Getting hold of<br />

environmental licences to undertake big projects is a huge<br />

hassle. They have been known to delay a project's start by<br />

as much as ve years. One aggrieved investor recounts<br />

how his rm had to wait months to get approval to take a<br />

port terminal, because it needed 21 separate entities to<br />

sign off. Dilma Rousseff, Brazll's president, has at least<br />

made it possible to fast-track approval for certain<br />

infrastructure projects. Yet it is not unheard of for a<br />

project to be halted when it is nearly nished, as happened<br />

earlier this year to a São Paulo mall because of a missing<br />

licence. The introduction of "completion insurance" could<br />

help, says Fernando Gentil of Darby, a private-equity rm,<br />

but no one offers it in Brazil at the moment.<br />

5 . Whether investors are willing to put with delays,<br />

bureaucracy and other costs ultimately depends on what<br />

sort of return they expect to achieve. Most infrastructure<br />

funds in Brazil say they target nominal returns of around<br />

20%. But a licence to operate three airports that the<br />

government auctioned in February looks set to yield only<br />

8%. investors in infrastructure also want long-lasting<br />

projects with stable cash ows, which means they will<br />

probably leave it to the government to build stadiums that<br />

may barely be used after the 2016 Olympics. As for other<br />

projects that matter a lot more to the country's future, Ms<br />

Rousseff has lots to do if she wants to lure private money<br />

to back them.<br />

internet:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!