The effects of third-order torque and self - Saint Louis University

References
1. Loftus BP, Artun J, Nicholls JI, Alonzo TA, Stoner JA.
Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in
various bracket-arch wire combinations. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:336-345.
2. Frank CA, Nikolai RJ. A comparative study of frictional
resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire. Am J
Orthod 1980;78:593-609.
3. Rossouw PE. Friction: An overview. Sem Orthod
2003;9:218-222.
4. Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Biomedical considerations in sliding
mechanics. In: Nanda R (ed). Biomechanics in Clinical
Orthodontics. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders, 1997:pp 188-
217.
5. Sims APT, Waters NE, Birnie DJ, Pethybridge RJ. A
comparison of the forces required to produce tooth movement
in vitro using two self-ligating brackets and a preadjusted
bracket employing two types of ligation. Eur J
Orthod 1993;15:377-385.
6. Nanda RS. Biomechanics and Esthetic Strategies in
Clinical Orthodontics. Saint Louis, MO, Elsevier Saunders,
2005.
7. Prososki RR, Bagby MD, Erickson LC. Static frictional
force and surface roughness of nickel-titanium arch wires.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:341-348.
8. Stannard JG, Gau JM, Hanna MA. Comparative friction of
orthodontic wires under dry and wet conditions. Am J Orthod
1986;89:485-491.
9. Garner LD, Allai WW, Moore BK. A comparison of
frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a
continuous edgewise arch wire. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1986;90:199-203.
10. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ, Ambrose WW, Newman JG. Evaluation
of titanium brackets for orthodontic treatment: part I. The
passive configuration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1998;114:558-572.
72