02.03.2013 Views

Moving Picture World (Dec 1917) - Learn About Movie Posters

Moving Picture World (Dec 1917) - Learn About Movie Posters

Moving Picture World (Dec 1917) - Learn About Movie Posters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-<br />

1800 THE MOVING PICTURE WORLD <strong>Dec</strong>ember 22, <strong>1917</strong><br />

es-^:-«'^?-^'^-^^^ :<br />

Reviews of Current Productions<br />

EXCLUSIVELY BY OUR OWN STAFF<br />

-&& ^ -^ -^^ ^ ^<br />

Qjj g jg ^- gg ^-^-^-"^T^ ^ »>s •^-^ ec:<br />

"Z,es Mise rabies"<br />

William Fox Ten-Part Picturization of Victor Hugo's Powerful<br />

Story, with William Farnum as Jean Valjean,<br />

a Notable Production.<br />

Reviewed by Edward Weitzel.<br />

FRANK LLOYD, the adaptor and director of the William<br />

Fox ten-part picturization of Victor Hugo's famous story,<br />

"Les Miserables," has accomplished both tasks in a highly<br />

praiseworthy manner. Aided by William Farnum, in a forceful<br />

and sympathetic embodiment of Jean Valjean, and by<br />

the excellent acting of the rest of the cast, Director Lloyd<br />

has taken advantage of the many opportunities for dramatic<br />

situations of great power and has placed them in realistic<br />

Scene from "Les Miserables" (Fox).<br />

settings that lack nothing which liberality and artistic perception<br />

could supply. "Les Miserables," with its wealth of<br />

strongly contrasted characterization and its human and humane<br />

theme, is the great heart-interest story of fiction. The<br />

purpose of its creator, to show that the spark of good is<br />

never extinguished in the heart of man, and to plead for<br />

the downtrodden, is set forth so convincingly that the story<br />

Is for all time. In both novel and stage form Hugo's masterpiece<br />

has enjoyed a long and ardent popularity; its scenes are<br />

now made to live on the screen with a reality that adds new<br />

interest to the lives of Jean, Fantine and Cosette.<br />

At this late day It Is hardly necessary to recall the story of<br />

"Les Miserables." The history of the degraded galley-slave<br />

who is transformed into a man whose soul is touched with<br />

almost divine compassion and who lives only to do good is<br />

familiar to most people. The Fox screen version has been<br />

admirably planned. Opening with commendable simplicity and<br />

directness, it shows the figure of Jean Valjean returning to<br />

the cottage of his sister with the news that he has failed<br />

to obtain work and is unable to help buy her bread for her<br />

starving children. It then traces Jean's theft of the loaf of<br />

bread, his arrest, his prison term, his release, and his meeting<br />

with the good bishop. The Fantine incident Is told at length;<br />

then follows the history of Cosette and its close connection<br />

with the life of Valjean, the parts played by Javert, Marius,<br />

Eponine, Gavroche and Thenardier and his wife in the working<br />

out of the fates of the two leading characters being given<br />

the requisite amount of attention. All the moments of unforgettable<br />

dramatic tension are retained, but It is doubtful if<br />

any of them make a stronger impression than the scene of the<br />

rescue of little Cosette from the Thenardiers. The picture of<br />

Jean Valjean leaving the inn with the ill-treated child in one<br />

arm and her new doll in the other will moisten many an eye. In<br />

the last episode the battle at the barricade, with the death<br />

of the heroic little Gavroche and the flight of Valjean through<br />

the sewers of Paris with the insensible Marius on his shoulder,<br />

are two of the best reproduced Incidents of the story. To<br />

have condensed into ten parts so comprehensive a version of<br />

o'a work, with its numerous well-rounded characters and<br />

opulence of incident, is an achievement of uncommon worth.<br />

William Farnum's performance of Valjean has the honesty<br />

of Hugo's hero. Meeting every physical requirement of the<br />

.•haracter, the actor exhibits a firmness of purpose, clearness<br />

of conception and general aptitude for the part that renders<br />

his work wholly satisfying. Hardee Kirkland, as the sinister<br />

Javert, might have stepped out from the covers of the book,<br />

and George Moss, as the bishop, is equally true to prototype.<br />

The Fantine of Sonia Markova is a figure of compelling pathos<br />

that never oversteps the bounds of artistic restraint. Jewel<br />

Carmen is a lovable Cosette, and high-grade impersonations<br />

are given by Edward Elkus as Thenardier, Dorothy Bernard<br />

as Eponine, Kittens Reichert as Cosette at eight years of<br />

age, and Mina Ross as Mme. Thenardier.<br />

"Who Shall Take My Lifer<br />

Selig's Seven-Reel Propaganda Special Has Thrilling Interest<br />

—Ably Directed by Colin Campbell, with Thomas Santschi,<br />

Fritzi Brunette, Bessie Eyton and Other Wellknown<br />

Players in the Cast.<br />

Reviewed by James S. McQuade.<br />

IT<br />

is already widely known that the script of "Who Shall<br />

Take My Life?" was written by Maibelle Heikes Justice,<br />

the well known author of numerous short stories, special<br />

articles and photoplays. The father of Miss Heikes Justice was<br />

a prominent jurist, and, doubtless, through her close intimacy<br />

with his life work, the author had knowledge of several, if<br />

not many, cases where justice had miscarried and where the<br />

innocent were made to suffer for crimes of which they were<br />

innocent. Whether this be so or not is immaterial, as Miss<br />

Heikes Justice is an ardent opponent of capital punishment,<br />

and the story of this thrilling photoplay shows that she had<br />

her whole heart in the work, and that she has furnished a<br />

most convincing argument in favor of her belief.<br />

The case of the state against "Big Bill" O'Shaughnessy becomes<br />

in the hands of the author clear and convincing, with<br />

not a single loophole for escape; and yet, when the condemned<br />

man, convicted by circumstantial evidence, has been electrocuted,<br />

there flashes over the wires to the warden of the prison<br />

in which O'Shaughnessy had just suffered the death penalty<br />

word that the supposedly murdered woman had been discovered<br />

in a Western city—alive, and following the course of an unrepentant<br />

Magdalen! This certainly, whether one believes in<br />

capital punishment or not, is a terrific argument against circumstantial<br />

evidence in certain cases.<br />

Director Colin Campbell has furnished many realistic settings<br />

for this big, enthralling photoplay. The courtroom scene is<br />

especially dignified and lifelike, as is also the interior showing<br />

the meeting of a state legislature. The prison interiors,<br />

including the gruesome death chambers for prisoners who have<br />

left all hope, behind, make one shiver to look at them. A view<br />

of the electrocution chamber has been wisely spared the spectator,<br />

but he is sobered to the point of solemnity as he watches<br />

the prisoner conducted toward it accompanied by his spiritual<br />

Scene from "Who Shall Take My Life?" (Selig).<br />

comforters and preceded by the warden and his staff and those<br />

invited to be present.<br />

Thomas Santschi has given us a most intelligent impersonation<br />

of the brawny bridgetender, Bill O'Shaughnessy. He<br />

brings out very forcefully the bravery of this uncultured giant,<br />

confident to the last that his innocence of crime will prevent<br />

him from going to the chair. Even the pious confessor, who<br />

seeks a clear view of the condemned man's heart in order that<br />

he may administer the last rites of the church, is thrown aside

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!