Moving Picture World (Dec 1917) - Learn About Movie Posters
Moving Picture World (Dec 1917) - Learn About Movie Posters
Moving Picture World (Dec 1917) - Learn About Movie Posters
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1770 THE MOVING PICTURE WORLD <strong>Dec</strong>ember .22, <strong>1917</strong><br />
; a'gjgjgjaa^<br />
MAY<br />
By J. B. Sutcliffe.<br />
MACLAREN, American<br />
two successful productions<br />
film actress and star<br />
still being exhibited<br />
of<br />
at<br />
the Philharmonic Hall, London, is shortly expected to<br />
appear in British film productions.<br />
* * *<br />
Occasionally managers of moving picture theaters in different<br />
parts of the kingdom have complained to me of the<br />
petty pilferings bred of the souvenir habit. One picture<br />
theater, which shall be nameless, has a reputation for its<br />
decorative tapestry and lace, but every night when the<br />
manager makes his final rounds one, two and sometimes<br />
more pieces are, thanks to light-fingered patrons, invariably<br />
missing. "It's the souvenir habit," he remarked, "more<br />
than an inherent desire to steal. Some patrons when they<br />
come into a nicely furnished lounge or lobby seem to<br />
imagine that any little trinkets or ornaments employed in<br />
the general decorative scheme of the lounge are there to<br />
be picked up with the handbills." I have often heard of the<br />
retention—in the temporary absence of the attendant—of<br />
the metal tickets issued by the automatic ticket issuing<br />
machines and here the motive is quite apparent. But to<br />
managers who are troubled with souvenir hunters I would<br />
commend the remedy of the one quoted above and fasten<br />
loose effects down to some substantial fixture.<br />
The mention of metal tickets reminds me that a York<br />
exhibitor has had one of his sent to him by a soldier on<br />
h tive service who found the metal disc in the ruins of a<br />
Get man fortress at Thiepval.<br />
* * *<br />
The Ideal Film Renting Co. is not to abandon the project it<br />
had under negotiation at the time of Winston Churchill's appointment<br />
to the Ministry of Munitions. This was the production<br />
of an imposing spectacular war picture entitled,<br />
"How the Great War Arose," and Mr. Churchill was to<br />
write the script and superintend the production. Should<br />
this yet be done, or a suitable substitute for Mr. Churchill<br />
be found, it is likely that the picture will be sponsored by<br />
the Allied Governments as an official statement of their<br />
cause in going to war. Apart from this the Ideal Co.'s<br />
diary of production is a full one. Versions of Fielding's<br />
"Tom Jones" and Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice" are<br />
near the completion stage, while "The Bachelors' Club"<br />
(Zangwill), "Shirley" (Bronte) "Quinneys" (H. A. Vachel),<br />
"Kipps" (H. G. Wells), and revised adaptations of "Nicholas<br />
Nickleby" and "Westward Ho" are well under way.<br />
* * *<br />
"The Manxman," a London film company's creation after<br />
Hall Caine's novel, already shown in the States, made its<br />
appearance in London at the New Galley Kinema.<br />
* * * .<br />
Sir Johnston Forbes-Robertson sails for the States in a<br />
day or two to fulfill his engagement with the newly constituted<br />
Hyclass Producing Corporation of New York City<br />
to appear personally in his greatest dramatic success of the<br />
spoken stage, "The Passing of the Third Floor Back," by<br />
Jerome K. Jerome.<br />
* * *<br />
The principal contribution from America to the trade<br />
shows of the week is perhaps the third of the Kitty Gordon<br />
subjects, entitled "One Week." While undeniably within<br />
the category of vampire plays, it unfolds its story upon<br />
original lines and amongst those exhibitors with audiences<br />
of an appetite for strong meat it is assured of an extensive<br />
showing. It is handled here by the Apex Film Co.<br />
* * *<br />
The past few days have seen the removal of one of the<br />
landmarks of moving-picti're development in London, the<br />
closing down of the old King's Hall in Commercial Road,<br />
East End. Time was, now nearly a dozen years ago, when<br />
the Old King's, as it was familiarly known, was the cradle<br />
of moving pictures on London's most densely populated<br />
side. It kept well in pace with the times and before competition<br />
in the East End became keen always showed an<br />
attractive program.<br />
* * *<br />
Considering the nature of the ground and the prices<br />
charged for admission it is no exaggeration to say that the<br />
Commercial Road area of eastern London offers the most<br />
remarkable record of kinematographic development in the<br />
whole of the Metropolis. There are theaters in this district<br />
which carry specialization to a fine art, the Polish Jews'"<br />
kinema, for instance, has a set of Russian titles made for<br />
every film shown there. In design and furnishing, while<br />
not comparable to the best West End theaters, I know of<br />
many in central London which fare worse.<br />
Effect of <strong>Picture</strong> Depends on Exhibitor<br />
Raoul Walsh Says Operators Who "Monkey" with Tempoof<br />
Action Undo Work of Careful Directors.<br />
THE<br />
director may labor like a trojan; but the ultimate<br />
effect of his picture on the screen depends on the<br />
artistic integrity of the individual exhibitor. That is<br />
the belief of Raoul A. Walsh, the American director who<br />
has used his short leisure before beginning work on his<br />
first Goldwyn production to make a tour of some of New-<br />
York's moving picture theaters.<br />
"Frankly," says Mr. Walsh, "I have been very much disturbed<br />
over the way I have seen many of my own picturesrun.<br />
The Twentieth Century Express is a horsecar beside<br />
some of the speed I have seen careless operators or shortsighted<br />
house managers put into their films. In my opinion,<br />
such haste is nothing short of criminal. It is unfair to the<br />
director who has timed his action as closely as possible<br />
"<br />
to the right tempo. And any manager who thinks he will<br />
profit by crowding in an extra show by such methods is<br />
making a big mistake. He is ruining good entertainment,,<br />
and when he ruins good entertainment, he is making disappointed<br />
audiences, audiences that won't come back.<br />
"I have been just as much impressed by another mistake<br />
in projection. It isn't a case of mistaken avarice. It's<br />
really well meaning. But it's stupid and criminal just the<br />
same. This is the trick which some operators have of Hitting<br />
up the speed of the machine when big, swift, dramatic<br />
scenes flash on the screen. Their intention is right. They<br />
want to make a distinction in tempo between the scenes<br />
of quieter action and those with punch in them. In the<br />
early days, it was often necessary for the operator to dothis,<br />
because the director had failed to provide the proper<br />
tempo himself.<br />
"My own practice is to watch this matter of tempo very<br />
closely indeed. I take the bulk of my straight scenes at<br />
13 or 14 exposures a second. When it is swift comedy or<br />
big melodramatic action—a chase or a fight or a raid, for<br />
instance—my cameraman slows down to 11 or 12. And then,<br />
of course, when the complete film is run through the projector<br />
at a normal, constant speed of 14, all the tempo<br />
runs true, the quiet scenes at a quiet pace, the melodrama<br />
with a rush.<br />
"But all this is—and should be—the director's business,,<br />
not the operator's. Sometimes it takes some very difficult<br />
manipulation of lights to keep the exposures right; but<br />
there is no difficulty here that a competent director cannot<br />
solve. Unfortunately, the maker of a film is at the absolute<br />
mercy of the man who shows it. And perhaps he is to be<br />
congratulated that so many managers and operators doappreciate<br />
their responsibilities."<br />
BUSINESS GOOD IN EMPIRE STATE.<br />
Lewis D. Brown, owner and manager of the <strong>Moving</strong> <strong>Picture</strong><br />
Machine Company of Binghamton, New York, was a<br />
caller in the New York office of the <strong>World</strong> last week. He<br />
is moving to a new address at 28 Henry Street and states<br />
that he has built up quite a little business in machines,<br />
repair parts and theater supplies in his vicinity. Being<br />
an expert electrician .he is in a position to make installations<br />
and covers a considerable section of the northwestern<br />
part of the Empire State, where his services are in demand.<br />
Mosf of the theater managers he has visited recently report<br />
good business that has not been effected by the war<br />
tax to any appreciable extent.<br />
MORE METRO MEN ENLIST.<br />
Dwight Begeman, cameraman, is the latest Metro employe<br />
to enter the service. He has left for his home in<br />
St. Louis, to enlist in the navy, and he hopes to be assigned<br />
to the work of taking motion pictures for the Government.<br />
Jack Lamond, another of Metro's photographic force, is<br />
already engaged in taking pictures of naval manoeuvres.<br />
Irving Flisser, formerly a member of Metro's electrical<br />
force, under the supervision of Frank Detering, is in the<br />
navy.