Moving Picture World (Dec 1917) - Learn About Movie Posters
Moving Picture World (Dec 1917) - Learn About Movie Posters
Moving Picture World (Dec 1917) - Learn About Movie Posters
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Dec</strong>ember 22, <strong>1917</strong> THE MOVING PICTURE WORLD 1781<br />
portional increase in light at the crater. (Screen, not crater.<br />
Ed.) The view is not taken dogmatically by Bowen. He<br />
takes a slightly more liberal attitude and favors a comparatively<br />
high amperage.<br />
Following the line of thought let me submit the following<br />
concerning temperature of carbon as It exists in the sun. It<br />
is thought that carbon exists in an incandescent state in the<br />
sun at from 8,000 to 10,000 degrees C, whereas the temperature<br />
of the electric arc is less than 5,000 degrees C. The value<br />
of the foregoing is as showing possibility of higher temperature,<br />
with consequent greater amount of light from a given area.<br />
You will, I think, agree that a greater amount ot light is<br />
given off as crater area is increased, for the reason that a<br />
greater number of carbon atoms are involved as area is<br />
added. Now the point I wish to make is that the number of<br />
light 'rays depend directly upon the number of carbon atoms<br />
involved and the brilliancy of these rays depends upon the<br />
degree of heat to which the atoms are subjected.<br />
Stromberg continues at some length further, but did not set his<br />
ideas forth in such form that I could follow his argument. His general<br />
idea is that brilliancy depends upon degree of heat, which is quite<br />
true. The contention has been that increase in heat was impossible<br />
after the volatilization point is reached. Griffiths is now trying to<br />
kick that particular pot of beans over, and I don't know but that he<br />
has succeded. I have printed Stromberg's letter because of his farfetched<br />
argument—the sun. Prove to us that temperature can be increased<br />
in an open electric arc and we will—well, just do it, that's all,<br />
friend Stromberg.<br />
Insert in Next Issue.<br />
J. Robert Sherman, New York City, sends in a communication with<br />
request : "Kindly insert the following in your next isue." How many<br />
times must I tell you that "insert in the next issue" is an utterly<br />
impossible demand, insofar as concerns this department, because it,<br />
the department- for the next issue, is either on the press or at<br />
least printed when such a request is received. Getting out a publication<br />
such as the <strong>Moving</strong> <strong>Picture</strong> <strong>World</strong> has grown to be, is a task<br />
of rather colossal magnitude, when one considers that it is, except<br />
for some of the smaller advertisements and the department headings,<br />
torn all to pieces and made over entirely new each week. I do not<br />
believe there is a firm in all this great city which would undertake<br />
the task of getting the <strong>Moving</strong> <strong>Picture</strong> <strong>World</strong> out and agree to hold<br />
the forms of all its departments open to within five days of date<br />
of publication. Once and for all let me again say that this department<br />
is actually printed fully a week before the main editorial and film<br />
review forms are closed. Also there is always enough matter in type<br />
awaiting publication to fill from five to ten weeks of the department,<br />
to say nothing of dozens of pages of Mss in process of correction<br />
being gotten ready for placing in type. Matters which demand early<br />
publication are put through special and usually can be gotten into<br />
the department the issue following the next issue after their receipt,<br />
thus : suppose I receive in today's mail, Monday, November 12, a<br />
letter which it is, from some reason necessary to rush into print.<br />
The "next issue" is already printed, folded and ready for the stitcher.<br />
I grab my trusty typewriter, rattle the thing into Mss form, mark it<br />
at the top "RUSH" and give it to Keyser, the villain who manhandles<br />
my copy. He gets busy and the article will be found in the issue<br />
which goes forth the following week— if we are lucky, otherwise then<br />
the next week following. And that is the best that can be done. I<br />
set this forth fully because of the many demands for "publication in<br />
the next issue." Of course the correspondent does not have to wait<br />
for his reply to questions, since the carbon copy takes care of that.<br />
Friend Sherman says<br />
Being interested in the moving picture industry, ot least as<br />
much as a "movie fiend" could be, it is but natural that<br />
scarcely anything connected therewith escapes my attention.<br />
In November 3 issue, one, Brother Feiman, permits himself to<br />
acquaint the public at large with a few "inside facts" as to the<br />
troubles of the operator and disadvantages under which he<br />
labors. Generally speaking his remarks are well founded in<br />
fact, but he is, nevertheless, quite too pessmistic. In the same<br />
issue, in fact on the same page, we find the report of a banquet<br />
given by the American Projection Society, at which Mr.<br />
S. L. Rothapfel, managing director Rialto theater, New York<br />
City, announced that his chief operator, Lester Bowen, was<br />
scheduled to receive a salary of $5,000 per year. Naturally,<br />
Mr. Rothapfel being a sound busines man, it follows that he<br />
considers Bowen's services to be worth that sum. In other<br />
words, where there is merit there must be appreciation. Of<br />
course the appreciation of the public contributes a large share<br />
to the success of the movie operator. A recent incident witnessed<br />
by the writer evidenced the fact that appreciation by<br />
the audience will stimulate the operator and inspire him with<br />
added energy and enthusiasm. During the week of October 15<br />
the Eighty-first Street theater, to which I often go, presented<br />
its entire house staff, including manager, stage crew, ushers<br />
and last but not least, its chief operator, in motion pictures.<br />
They were all warmly aplauded, but the greatest enthusiasm<br />
was shown for the chief operator, whom I afterward learned<br />
was I. H. Lobel. The house programme of this theater shows<br />
the names of the entire staff. I for one can tell when a production<br />
is properly projected and interpreted on the screen,<br />
and I appreciate good work in the operating room.<br />
I heartily wish your statement that "where there is merit there<br />
must be appreciation" were true. As a matter of fact it was a long,<br />
very hard and steeply uphill pull to get friend manager to discern<br />
between ordinary and artistic work on the screen ; also it was a'<br />
difficult matter to educate the public to differentiate between high<br />
' class projection and ordinary, and the education of both manager and<br />
public in the matter of interpretation of the photoplay on the screen<br />
is as yet hardly begun, this department being the pioneer in that hugely<br />
important matter, even as it has been the pioneer 'n almost every<br />
movement for better projection. Even Mr. Rothapfel has yet to give<br />
that matter the attention its great importance merits. As a matter<br />
of fact, instead of appreciating high class work it Is a lamentable<br />
fact that a very large percentage of managers do not themselves know<br />
more than enough to distinguish between very poor projection and<br />
excellence in that direction. They are utterly unable to differentiate<br />
as between high class work and ordinary, and Insofar as concerns interpretation<br />
of the screen drama, why they would look at you in sheer<br />
amazement did you but mention it. There are, of course, Isolated cases<br />
where the operator gets his due, but as a whole und^r present conditions.<br />
I cannot agree that Feiman was more pessimistic than facts<br />
warrant.<br />
Three Hundred <strong>Picture</strong>s Per Second.<br />
Eberhardt Schneider, New York City, builder of experimental apparatus,<br />
whose services are much in demand by inventors and experimenters<br />
in the motion picture field, is the inventor of an elliptical movement<br />
for special motion picture cameras which enables the taking of<br />
pictures at the wonderful speed of one hundred and sixty per second<br />
in fact a little in excess of that figure. Those who may wish to examine<br />
this movement can get the patent description and drawings by<br />
sending ten cents to the Commissioner of Patents, Washington, D. C,<br />
asking for specifications and drawings on patent No. 1,1(>5,G29, granted<br />
<strong>Dec</strong>ember 28, 1915. In connection with this movement is a plan, also<br />
Mr. Schneider's invention, for eliminating static by blowing a strong air<br />
current crosses the film at the aperture.<br />
Mr. Schneider is now perfecting a plan and constructing the necessary<br />
apparatus to take pictures at the rate of five hundred (500) per<br />
second. Oh yes, I said "second" allright ! This scheme is being worked<br />
out to enable the government to study more intelligently shell action in<br />
some of its phases. The seemingly impossible feat is to be accomplished<br />
by constructing a special triplex camera having three of the<br />
aforesaid rapid movements. The movement is a modification of the<br />
continuous moving film idea and, as before set forth, enables a speed of<br />
about 100 pictures per second. The camera will be so geared that each<br />
of its three films will be exposed alternately, there being three negative<br />
films in the camera. The impressions thus made will be printed in<br />
their proper order on one positive film and we will thus have a standard<br />
film upon which are impressed photographs taken at the rate of<br />
500 per second. This film will be projected to the screen in the usual<br />
way, and its projection at normal speed will have the effect of slowing<br />
down the shell flight, or its impact, as the case may be, about twenty<br />
times, since, whereas, 500 pictures are taken per second, only from 16<br />
to 20 will be projected in that period of time. But even so, the action<br />
of a shell is at such tremendous speed that one-twentieth will, I think,<br />
be plenty swift. The chief interest, however, centers about the taking<br />
of pictures at such terrific speed, and Mr. Schneider is to be complimented<br />
on having found the answer to such a problem.<br />
Boylan Even Tension Reel.<br />
The editor is just in receipt of a communication which conveys information<br />
that the Boylan Even Tension Reel will be placed on the<br />
market in the not distant future. We are especially interested In the<br />
marketing of this reel, because it will do away with all tension<br />
troubles, relieving the operator of much trouble and the film from<br />
much very unnecessary and damaging strain and will do all this in an<br />
extremely simple and effective way, without excessive cost or added<br />
complications to the machine.<br />
Projection Experience<br />
There Isn't »n cperator'e<br />
booth in the unl-<br />
Teroe In whlrh tht» carefully<br />
compiled book will<br />
not aare lu purchaae<br />
price each month.<br />
Bay it Today<br />
$4 the Copy<br />
Postpaid<br />
picture Handbook<br />
For Managers and Operators<br />
By F. H. RICHARDSON<br />
The recognized standard book on th« wort<br />
of tbe operator. Coin.de** deaerlptloaa and<br />
instructions on all leading<br />
operating equipment.<br />
MOVING PICTURE WORLD<br />
Schiller Bide<br />
Chicago. 111.<br />
To save<br />
516 Fifth Avenue ^ ri * hl * Cml "<br />
» «_ „. lender Rldf-<br />
New York City l,,, A n«elee, Cml.<br />
time, order from nearest office.<br />
This paper has never been published except in a Union shop,<br />
so It makes no difference whether we print tbe Union Label or<br />
not, but at the request of a few of our readers to the editor of<br />
this department it Is printed herewith