STATE OF THE ART REVIEWS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

COST ACTION E22: Environmental optimisation of wood protection Summary table of the signature countries and their activities directly relevant to the specific scope of COST Action E22 Institute Activity traditional wood preservatives specifying durability requirements Performance Impacts Innovations optimum bio-effective creosote and creosotebased products field performance using soil Austria insects in Europe, climatical conditions Belgium Croatia Finland France Germany Greece Ireland Italy 214 risk assessment optimum bioeffective life remediation wood wastes and treated wood creosote and creosotebased products application of modified wood heat treatment insect growth regulators other
COST ACTION E22: Environmental optimisation of wood protection Summary table of the signature countries and their activities directly relevant to the specific scope of COST Action E22 (continued) Institute Activity traditional wood preservatives specifying durability requirements Performance Impacts Innovations optimum bio-effective creosote and creosotebased products Latvia field performance using soil Norway insects in Europe, climatical conditions Portugal Romania Slovenia Spain Sweden The Netherlands United Kingdom 215 risk assessment optimum bioeffective life remediation wood wastes and treated wood creosote and creosotebased products application of modified wood heat treatment insect growth regulators other
Page 1 and 2:
COST ACTION E22: Environmental opti
Page 3 and 4:
compiled and edited by COST ACTION
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
COUNTRY AUTHOR COST ACTION E22: Env
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Working Group 2: IMPACTS COST ACTIO
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
1. PARTICIPANTS COST ACTION E22: En
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
4. CONCLUSIONS COST ACTION E22: Env
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
2. PARTICIPATS COST ACTION E22: Env
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Working Group 2: IMPACTS COST ACTIO
Page 121 and 122:
5. ANNEXES COST ACTION E22: Environ
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Industrial R&D Departments Research
Page 147 and 148:
4. CONCLUSIONS COST ACTION E22: Env
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
2. RESEARCH ACTIVITIES Current line
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164: Contact person(s): COST ACTION E22:
Page 165 and 166: COST ACTION E22: Environmental opti
Page 167 and 168: Contact person: Prof. Kai Ödeen E-
Page 175 and 176: SHR Hout Research (SHR) Waldemar Ho
Page 177 and 178: 4. CONCLUSIONS COST ACTION E22: Env
Page 179 and 180: SHR Timber Research Section Wood Te
Page 183 and 184: Research themes COST ACTION E22: En
Page 197 and 198: 2. PARTICIPANTS COST ACTION E22: En
Page 199 and 200: Working Group 2: IMPACTS COST ACTIO
Page 201 and 202: Wood Technology Institute - CNR Dr
Page 213: COST ACTION E22: Environmental opti
show all

STATE OF THE ART REVIEWS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?