17.03.2013 Views

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

129<br />

Mr. Pinto: “Ok. And you think that the fact that we marked the book that way, so we<br />

are benefitting with that amount and you are having a loss of that amount?”<br />

Mr. Martin-Artajo: “Well, I, I just, I’m just concerned that the bid/offer spread is wide,<br />

and I don’t know where the, the, the prices are when we trade. That’s basically what it is,<br />

really.”<br />

Mr. Pinto: “Ok, so then, then, I think that we need to get Jean Francois 735<br />

to take a look<br />

of the marks and see if there is anything that is being done inappropriate. What I was<br />

telling Achilles is that we haven’t … had recently, any substantial … discrepancies in the<br />

valuations with clients, or any market disputes.”<br />

Mr. Martin-Artajo: “Ok.”<br />

Mr. Pinto: “So, if we would have something of that nature, we would have substantial<br />

market disputes. But in any case, so I’ll take a look and then we’ll take it from there. …<br />

Mr. Pinto: “But, but, yeah but to think, to think, that someone from us … went and<br />

openly in the market, talked about your positions? Really? I would be extremely<br />

surprised.”<br />

Mr. Macris: “Ok.”<br />

Mr. Pinto: “That the market knows that, what your positions are? That may be, because<br />

you bought tons of it.”<br />

Mr. Macris: “Yeah.” 736<br />

According to JPMorgan Chase, the Investment Bank reviewed its books, determined it<br />

had not traded in size against the CIO, had correctly marked its positions, and had no material<br />

collateral disputes indicating a problem with its marks. 737 Mr. Pinto’s logic in identifying<br />

collateral disputes as a red flag of mismarking shows that the bank itself should have focused on<br />

the CIO’s growing collateral disputes in March and April as evidence of a mismarking problem.<br />

JPMorgan Chase also told the Subcommittee “there was no evidence that the Investment Bank<br />

was leaking” information about the CIO’s positions to the market at large. 738<br />

Instead, as Mr.<br />

Pinto pointed out and as Mr. Macris admitted, the market’s awareness of the CIO’s positions was<br />

attributable to the CIO’s voluminous trading.<br />

735<br />

Jean Francois Bessin was the director and global head of valuation for the Investment Bank.<br />

736<br />

3/23/2012 Subcommittee transcription of recorded telephone conversation between Achilles Macris, Javier<br />

Martin-Artajo, CIO, and Daniel Pinto, Investment Bank, JPM-CIO-PSI-A 0000140.<br />

737<br />

Subcommittee interview of John Hogan and Ashley Bacon, JPMorgan Chase (9/4/2012).<br />

738<br />

Id. (noting that that the bank’s compliance group had come to that conclusion, which Mr. Martin-Artajo<br />

accepted).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!