JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES
JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES
JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
226<br />
acquired a complex mix of long and short credit instruments with varying reference assets and<br />
maturities, and the portfolio began to trigger breaches of the CIO’s stress loss limit. 1265<br />
For example, in the first half of 2011, the CIO reported multiple, sustained breaches of its<br />
stress limits and attributed those breaches to increased activity in its “synthetic credit (tranche)<br />
1266<br />
book.” The CIO’s stress limits were triggered eight times, sometimes for weeks at a stretch,<br />
from January to June 2011. 1267 The bank notified the OCC about those stress limit breaches, like<br />
other internal risk limit breaches, in the bank’s regular Market Risk Management (MRM)<br />
Reporting emails which listed risk limit breaches and in its weekly Market Risk Stress Testing<br />
reports. 1268 In those reports, the CIO attributed all of the CIO’s stress limit breaches to changes<br />
in its “synthetic credit (tranche book).” 1269 In the first breach of the year, for example, which<br />
occurred on January 27, 2011, the CIO continued to breach the limit for seven weeks in a row,<br />
peaking at 50% over the limit. 1270<br />
The CIO’s stress limit breaches were dramatic and sustained during the first half of 2011,<br />
yet when the OCC inquired into the reason for the breaches, the bank “failed to offer any details<br />
1271<br />
about the source,” and the OCC did not pursue additional information. In hindsight, the OCC<br />
identified its failure to follow up on the results of the stress limit breaches – whose very purpose<br />
was to identify portfolio risk – as “one of our misses.” 1272 In fact, it was a major misstep. By<br />
failing to insist on bank answers about the synthetic credit tranche book, the OCC missed a key<br />
opportunity to examine and perhaps curb the excesses of the SCP prior to its incurring losses in<br />
2012. The OCC also told the Subcommittee that the multiple breaches of the 2011 stress limit<br />
provided evidence that the SCP was not, even then, providing stress loss protection to the bank,<br />
or acting as a hedge, but was engaging in a strategy to earn profits for the bank. 1273<br />
Later in 2011, the SCP entered into a high risk derivatives bet which, due to an American<br />
Airlines declaration of bankruptcy, produced roughly $400 million in unexpected revenues for<br />
1274<br />
the CIO in late November. One of the CIO traders, Bruno Iksil, purchased tranches in a<br />
soon-to-expire credit index series, which leveraged the CIO’s position to produce the gain. The<br />
1265 Stress loss limits are dollar amounts representing plausible losses under specified “adverse and abnormal market<br />
environments.” 2013 JPMorgan Chase Task Force Report, at 82. Stress testing was applied on a weekly basis to the<br />
SCP to determine whether it would exceed its stress loss limit. If the limit was exceeded, the CIO was supposed to<br />
reconfigure the SCP to end the breach. For more information, see Chapter V.<br />
1266<br />
Subcommittee interview of Michael Sullivan and Doug McLaughlin, OCC (8/30/2012); 10/26/2012 OCC<br />
Confidential Supervisory Report, Appendix 4 (summary of CIO limit exceptions Jan. – June 2011) at PSI-OCC-13-<br />
000067 [Sealed Exhibit].<br />
1267<br />
See 10/26/2012 OCC Confidential Supervisory Report, Appendix 4 (summary of CIO limit exceptions Jan. –<br />
June 2011) at PSI-OCC-13-000067 [Sealed Exhibit].<br />
1268<br />
Id.<br />
1269<br />
Id.<br />
1270<br />
Subcommittee interview of Michael Sullivan and Doug McLaughlin, OCC (8/30/2012); 10/26/2012 OCC<br />
Confidential Supervisory Report, Appendix 4 (summary of CIO limit exceptions Jan. – June 2011) at PSI-OCC-13-<br />
000067 [Sealed Exhibit].<br />
1271<br />
See 10/26/2012 OCC Confidential Supervisory Report, at PSI-OCC-13-000042 [Sealed Exhibit].<br />
1272<br />
Subcommittee interview of Michael Sullivan and Doug McLaughlin, OCC (8/30/2012) (Doug McLaughlin).<br />
1273<br />
Subcommittee interview of Michael Sullivan and Doug McLaughlin, OCC (8/30/2012).<br />
1274<br />
See 4/5/2012 email from Ina Drew, CIO, to Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase, and others, “CIO,” JPM-CIO-PSI<br />
0000539 (“The fourth quarter 400 million gain was the result of the unexpected american airlines default.”). For<br />
more information about this bet, see Chapter 3.