17.03.2013 Views

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

226<br />

acquired a complex mix of long and short credit instruments with varying reference assets and<br />

maturities, and the portfolio began to trigger breaches of the CIO’s stress loss limit. 1265<br />

For example, in the first half of 2011, the CIO reported multiple, sustained breaches of its<br />

stress limits and attributed those breaches to increased activity in its “synthetic credit (tranche)<br />

1266<br />

book.” The CIO’s stress limits were triggered eight times, sometimes for weeks at a stretch,<br />

from January to June 2011. 1267 The bank notified the OCC about those stress limit breaches, like<br />

other internal risk limit breaches, in the bank’s regular Market Risk Management (MRM)<br />

Reporting emails which listed risk limit breaches and in its weekly Market Risk Stress Testing<br />

reports. 1268 In those reports, the CIO attributed all of the CIO’s stress limit breaches to changes<br />

in its “synthetic credit (tranche book).” 1269 In the first breach of the year, for example, which<br />

occurred on January 27, 2011, the CIO continued to breach the limit for seven weeks in a row,<br />

peaking at 50% over the limit. 1270<br />

The CIO’s stress limit breaches were dramatic and sustained during the first half of 2011,<br />

yet when the OCC inquired into the reason for the breaches, the bank “failed to offer any details<br />

1271<br />

about the source,” and the OCC did not pursue additional information. In hindsight, the OCC<br />

identified its failure to follow up on the results of the stress limit breaches – whose very purpose<br />

was to identify portfolio risk – as “one of our misses.” 1272 In fact, it was a major misstep. By<br />

failing to insist on bank answers about the synthetic credit tranche book, the OCC missed a key<br />

opportunity to examine and perhaps curb the excesses of the SCP prior to its incurring losses in<br />

2012. The OCC also told the Subcommittee that the multiple breaches of the 2011 stress limit<br />

provided evidence that the SCP was not, even then, providing stress loss protection to the bank,<br />

or acting as a hedge, but was engaging in a strategy to earn profits for the bank. 1273<br />

Later in 2011, the SCP entered into a high risk derivatives bet which, due to an American<br />

Airlines declaration of bankruptcy, produced roughly $400 million in unexpected revenues for<br />

1274<br />

the CIO in late November. One of the CIO traders, Bruno Iksil, purchased tranches in a<br />

soon-to-expire credit index series, which leveraged the CIO’s position to produce the gain. The<br />

1265 Stress loss limits are dollar amounts representing plausible losses under specified “adverse and abnormal market<br />

environments.” 2013 JPMorgan Chase Task Force Report, at 82. Stress testing was applied on a weekly basis to the<br />

SCP to determine whether it would exceed its stress loss limit. If the limit was exceeded, the CIO was supposed to<br />

reconfigure the SCP to end the breach. For more information, see Chapter V.<br />

1266<br />

Subcommittee interview of Michael Sullivan and Doug McLaughlin, OCC (8/30/2012); 10/26/2012 OCC<br />

Confidential Supervisory Report, Appendix 4 (summary of CIO limit exceptions Jan. – June 2011) at PSI-OCC-13-<br />

000067 [Sealed Exhibit].<br />

1267<br />

See 10/26/2012 OCC Confidential Supervisory Report, Appendix 4 (summary of CIO limit exceptions Jan. –<br />

June 2011) at PSI-OCC-13-000067 [Sealed Exhibit].<br />

1268<br />

Id.<br />

1269<br />

Id.<br />

1270<br />

Subcommittee interview of Michael Sullivan and Doug McLaughlin, OCC (8/30/2012); 10/26/2012 OCC<br />

Confidential Supervisory Report, Appendix 4 (summary of CIO limit exceptions Jan. – June 2011) at PSI-OCC-13-<br />

000067 [Sealed Exhibit].<br />

1271<br />

See 10/26/2012 OCC Confidential Supervisory Report, at PSI-OCC-13-000042 [Sealed Exhibit].<br />

1272<br />

Subcommittee interview of Michael Sullivan and Doug McLaughlin, OCC (8/30/2012) (Doug McLaughlin).<br />

1273<br />

Subcommittee interview of Michael Sullivan and Doug McLaughlin, OCC (8/30/2012).<br />

1274<br />

See 4/5/2012 email from Ina Drew, CIO, to Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase, and others, “CIO,” JPM-CIO-PSI<br />

0000539 (“The fourth quarter 400 million gain was the result of the unexpected american airlines default.”). For<br />

more information about this bet, see Chapter 3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!