17.03.2013 Views

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

75<br />

Buy protection on the tightening move: The presentation proposed essentially buying<br />

credit protection when it was less expensive. 472<br />

As noted above, when credit markets are<br />

improving, credit insurance becomes less costly.<br />

Turn the position over to monetize volatility: The presentation proposed selling SCP<br />

473<br />

positions to take advantage of changing prices and locking in any profits. Coupled<br />

with the purchase of protection “on the tightening move,” the presentation was essentially<br />

proposing to buy low and sell high. 474<br />

Go long risk on some belly tranches: The reference to “belly tranches” is unclear. Most<br />

likely, belly tranches are credit index tranches which contain less risk than the equity<br />

475<br />

tranches but more than the super senior tranches. The presentation appears to propose<br />

buying the long side of those credit instruments.<br />

Use indices and add to existing position: The presentation noted that the SCP already<br />

476<br />

had some long credit index positions on the books, and proposed expanding those<br />

holdings.<br />

In addition to advocating those particular trading strategies, the presentation contained a<br />

warning about possible losses. In a section entitled, “Adverse scenarios and possible<br />

drawdowns,” the proposal stated that if unanticipated defaults occurred, they could impose costs<br />

of $200 million “upfront,” and if prices failed to behave as expected, additional losses of $300<br />

477<br />

million were possible. In other words, the proposal warned from the beginning that its trading<br />

strategies could result in losses totaling $500 million.<br />

The Subcommittee has not identified any formal approval document, but the ISMG<br />

apparently approved the proposed trading strategies, since the CIO traders immediately began<br />

implementing them in late January, in particular by buying substantial amounts of the IG9 credit<br />

478<br />

derivative index on the long side. This trading strategy would prove, however, in the words of<br />

Mr. Dimon, to have been “poorly conceived and vetted.” 479<br />

D. SCP’s Increasing Risk and Losses<br />

As the CIO traders implemented the new trading strategy and began acquiring more long<br />

positions in late January, the SCP exploded in size, complexity, and, consequently, risk. In<br />

contrast to its earlier years when the Synthetic Credit Portfolio produced positive revenues for<br />

472 Id.<br />

473 Id.<br />

474 Id.<br />

475 For more information on these credit index tranches, see Chapter 2.<br />

476 Subcommittee interview of Michael Sullivan, OCC (8/30/2012).<br />

477 1/26/2012 email from Bruno Iksil, CIO, to Andrew Perryman, CIO, “credit book last version,” conveying “Core<br />

Credit Book Highlights,” (January 2012), prepared by Mr. Iksil, at JPM-CIO-PSI 0000165.<br />

478 See 2013 JPMorgan Chase Task Force Report, at 31 (stating that by the end of January, the CIO traders had<br />

purchased about a $20 billion long position in the 10-year IG9 credit index and another $12 billion long position in<br />

the 5-year IG9 credit index).<br />

479 Testimony of Jamie Dimon, “A Breakdown in Risk Management: What Went Wrong at JPMorgan Chase?”<br />

before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, S.Hrg. 112-715 (June 13, 2012).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!