JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES
JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES
JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
75<br />
Buy protection on the tightening move: The presentation proposed essentially buying<br />
credit protection when it was less expensive. 472<br />
As noted above, when credit markets are<br />
improving, credit insurance becomes less costly.<br />
Turn the position over to monetize volatility: The presentation proposed selling SCP<br />
473<br />
positions to take advantage of changing prices and locking in any profits. Coupled<br />
with the purchase of protection “on the tightening move,” the presentation was essentially<br />
proposing to buy low and sell high. 474<br />
Go long risk on some belly tranches: The reference to “belly tranches” is unclear. Most<br />
likely, belly tranches are credit index tranches which contain less risk than the equity<br />
475<br />
tranches but more than the super senior tranches. The presentation appears to propose<br />
buying the long side of those credit instruments.<br />
Use indices and add to existing position: The presentation noted that the SCP already<br />
476<br />
had some long credit index positions on the books, and proposed expanding those<br />
holdings.<br />
In addition to advocating those particular trading strategies, the presentation contained a<br />
warning about possible losses. In a section entitled, “Adverse scenarios and possible<br />
drawdowns,” the proposal stated that if unanticipated defaults occurred, they could impose costs<br />
of $200 million “upfront,” and if prices failed to behave as expected, additional losses of $300<br />
477<br />
million were possible. In other words, the proposal warned from the beginning that its trading<br />
strategies could result in losses totaling $500 million.<br />
The Subcommittee has not identified any formal approval document, but the ISMG<br />
apparently approved the proposed trading strategies, since the CIO traders immediately began<br />
implementing them in late January, in particular by buying substantial amounts of the IG9 credit<br />
478<br />
derivative index on the long side. This trading strategy would prove, however, in the words of<br />
Mr. Dimon, to have been “poorly conceived and vetted.” 479<br />
D. SCP’s Increasing Risk and Losses<br />
As the CIO traders implemented the new trading strategy and began acquiring more long<br />
positions in late January, the SCP exploded in size, complexity, and, consequently, risk. In<br />
contrast to its earlier years when the Synthetic Credit Portfolio produced positive revenues for<br />
472 Id.<br />
473 Id.<br />
474 Id.<br />
475 For more information on these credit index tranches, see Chapter 2.<br />
476 Subcommittee interview of Michael Sullivan, OCC (8/30/2012).<br />
477 1/26/2012 email from Bruno Iksil, CIO, to Andrew Perryman, CIO, “credit book last version,” conveying “Core<br />
Credit Book Highlights,” (January 2012), prepared by Mr. Iksil, at JPM-CIO-PSI 0000165.<br />
478 See 2013 JPMorgan Chase Task Force Report, at 31 (stating that by the end of January, the CIO traders had<br />
purchased about a $20 billion long position in the 10-year IG9 credit index and another $12 billion long position in<br />
the 5-year IG9 credit index).<br />
479 Testimony of Jamie Dimon, “A Breakdown in Risk Management: What Went Wrong at JPMorgan Chase?”<br />
before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, S.Hrg. 112-715 (June 13, 2012).