17.03.2013 Views

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

positions in newly issued credit indices instead of in the IG9, where the SCP already held<br />

massive positions. 579<br />

Yet even there, the SCP’s massive buys attracted market attention.<br />

91<br />

By early April, press speculation about the large trades in the credit markets was<br />

building. On April 4, 2012, Peter Weiland, the head of market risk for the CIO, received a call<br />

from a reporter at the Wall Street Journal indicating that the paper was working on a story about<br />

580<br />

Bruno Iksil and the CIO. The next day, JPMorgan Chase’s head of Corporate<br />

Communications, Joe Evangelisti, sent an email to management describing the upcoming article.<br />

He wrote: “[T]hey are saying that Iksil currently has more than $200 billion in positions in credit<br />

trading products and has made JPM more than $600 million in profits over the past two<br />

years.” 581<br />

On April 6, 2012, both Bloomberg and the Wall Street Journal ran articles on Mr. Iksil’s<br />

trading. The Bloomberg story, entitled “JPMorgan Trader’s Positions Said to Distort Credit<br />

Indexes,” began:<br />

“A JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trader of derivatives linked to the financial<br />

health of corporations has amassed positions so large that he’s driving price<br />

moves in the $10 trillion market, traders outside the firm said.” 582<br />

Identifying Mr. Iksil, the article cited investors as complaining that his trades “may be distorting<br />

prices, affecting bondholders who use the instruments to hedge hundreds of billions of dollars of<br />

583<br />

fixed-income holdings.” More specifically, according to the article, two hedge-fund traders<br />

said they had seen “unusually large price swings when they were told by dealers that Iksil was in<br />

the market. At least some traders refer to Iksil as ‘the London Whale.’” 584 The article also said<br />

the size of the position could have been as large as $100 billion. 585<br />

The Wall Street Journal article, entitled “London Whale Rattles Debt Market,” told a<br />

586<br />

similar tale. The article stated:<br />

“[In] recent weeks, hedge funds and other investors have been puzzled by unusual<br />

movements in some credit markets, and have been buzzing about the identity of a<br />

deep-pocketed trader dubbed ‘the London Whale.’ That trader, according to<br />

people familiar with the matter, is a low-profile, French-born J.P. Morgan Chase<br />

& Co. employee named Bruno Michel Iksil. Mr. Iksil has taken large positions<br />

579<br />

Subcommittee briefing by JPMorgan Chase (8/15/2012) (stated by Jeanette Boot); JPMorgan Chase Task Force<br />

interview of Bruno Iksil, CIO (8/27/2012) (partial read out).<br />

580<br />

4/4/2012 email from Peter Weiland, CIO, to Irvin Goldman, CIO, “Call,” JPM-CIO-PSI-H 0002093.<br />

581<br />

4/5/2012 email from Joseph Evangelisti, JPMorgan Chase, to Ina Drew, CIO, Douglas Braunstein, JPMorgan<br />

Chase, and others, “WSJ/Bloomberg CIO stories,” JPM-CIO-PSI 0018414.<br />

582<br />

“JPMorgan Trader’s Positions Said to Distort Credit Indexes,” Bloomberg , Stephanie Ruhle, Bradley Keoun,<br />

and Mary Childs, (4/6/2012), http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-05/jpmorgan-trader-iksil-s-heft-is-said-todistort-credit-indexes.html.<br />

583<br />

Id.<br />

584<br />

Id.<br />

585<br />

Id.<br />

586<br />

“London Whale Rattles Debt Market,” Wall Street Journal, Gregory Zuckerman and Katy Burne, (4/6/2012),<br />

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303299604577326031119412436.html.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!