Soil Report - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Colwood CWO 2W 2 É 2 T (4W-5W)** Smithville Colwood coarse phase CWO.C 2W 2W 2 T (4W-5W)** very shallow phase SHV.V 411 4R 4R 4R 4R 4 T 4 T 5T 5T 6T Colwood peaty phase CWO.P 3W 3W 3W (5W)** St. Williams SLI 2W 2 É 2 T (4W-5W) ** Complex 1 CPX 1 7T 7T 7T 7T 7T 7T 7T 7T 7T 7T Styx SYX 2K-3KHt Complex 2 (CPX 2) 7I 7I 7I 7I 71 71 7I 7I 71 7I Tavistock TVK 1 2E 2T Complex 3 CPX 3 NOT RATED Toledo TLD 3 D 3 D 3 D (5W)** Complex 4 CPX 4 NOT RATED Toledo coarse phase TLD.C 3W 3W 3W (5W)** Complex 5 CPX 5 NOT RATED Toledo peaty phase TLDY 4W 4W 4W (5W)** Complex 6 CPX 6 NOT RATED Toledo shallow phase TLD .S 4W 4W 4W (5W)** Farmington Fox FRM FOX 611 6R 611 6R 6R 611 6R 6R 6R 6 T 2M 2M 2 T 2 s Toledo 3T 3T 4T 5T 5T Fox shallow phase FOX.S 6T 3R 3R 3R 3 T very shallow phase Tuscola TLDY TUC 5W 5W 5W 1 2E 2T (5W)** 3 T 3 Fox very shallow phase Gobles FOX.V GOB T 4T 5T 5T 6T 4R 4R 4R 411 4R 4R 4 T 5T 5T 6T 2D 2 D 2 D Tuscola coarse phase Tuscola shallow phase Tuscola TUC.C TUC .S 1 1 2T 311 311 311 Gobles coarse phase GOB.C 1 1 2 D very shallow phase TUC.V 411 411 411 Gobles loamy phase GOB.L 2D 2 D 2 D Urban Land U.L . NOT RATED Granby Granby loamy phase Granby peaty phase GNY GNY .L GNY.P 2W 2W 2W (4W-5W)** 3W 3W 3W (4W-5W)** 4W 4W 4W (5W)** Vanessa Vanessa peaty phase Vittoria VSS VSS.P VIT 2W 2W 2W 4W 4W 4W 1 1 2T (4W-5W) ** (5W)** Granby Walsher WSH 2M 2M 2 T 2 T 3T 3T 4T 5T 5T 6T very shallow phase GNY.V 5W 5W 5W Walsingham WAM 3F 3F 3F Haldimand HIM 3D 3D 3D Waterin WRN 3W 3W 3W (4W-5W) ** Haldimand coarse phase HIM.C 3D 3D 3D Waterin loamy phase WRN.L 3W 3W 3W (4W-5W) ** Haldimand loamy phase HIM .L 3D 3D 3D Waterin peaty phase WRNY 4W 4W 4W (5W)** Haldimand shallow phase Hampden Kelvin Kelvin coarse phase HIM .S HMP KVN KVN .C 3 R 3 R 3 D° 4HK-5HKt 3W 3W 3W 2W 2W 2W (5W)** (5W)** Wattford Wauseon Wauseon peaty phase Wauseon till phase Welland WAT WUS WUSY WUS .T WLL 2M 2 É 2 T 3T 3T 4T 4T 5T 5T 6T 2W 2W 2 T (4W-5W) ** 4W 4W 4W (5W)** 2W 2W 2W (4W-5W) ** 3 D 3 D 3 D (5W)** Kelvin loamy phase KVN.L 3W 3W 3W (5W)** Welland coarse phase WLL.C 3 D 3 w 3 D (5W)** Kelvin peaty phase Lincoln KVN.P LIC 4W 4W 4W 3 D 3 D 3 D (5W)** (5W)** Welland loamy phase WLL .L 3 D 3 D 3 D (5W)** W ilsonville WIL 2Fl s 2 M 2 2 7' 3T Lincoln coarse phase Lincoln loamy phase LIC .C LIC.L 3 D 3 D 3 D 3 D 3 D 3 D (5W)** (5W)** Wilsonville coarse phase WIL.C 3T 4T 5T 5T 6T 2 M 2 M 2 T 2 T 3T 3T 4T 5T 5T 6T Lincoln peaty phase LICY 4W 4W 4W (5W)** Wilsonville loamy phase WILL 2 M 2 M 2 s 2 T 3T 3T 4T 5T 5T 6T Lincoln shallow phase LIC .S 4W 4W 4W (5W)** Wilsonville Lincoln shallow phase WIL.S 3R 3R 3R 3 T 3 T 4T 4T 5T 5T 6T very shallow Phase LIC.V 5W 5W 5W (5W)** (See Footnotes on page 60)
(Footnotes for Table 10) tOrganic soil ratings are for intensive use such as vegetable production. *To determine the agricultural capability of map unit components with the help of Table 10, consider the following map unit examples: BRT1 BRT4 BRT4 C C>B CB (1) Determine components of the map unit in the numerator by referring to the legent of the soil map on which the map unit appears, e.g . BRT1 is composed of Brant soils ; BRT4 is composed of Brant and Tuscola soils . (2) Determine the approximate proportions and slopes of the map unit components from the denominators of the units, e.g . BRT1 C has Brant soils on simple C (2-5%) slopes ; BRT4 C>B has Brant soils on simple C slopes, and Tuscola soils on simple B (0-2%) slopes, in approximate 70 :30 proportions; BRT4 CB _ has Brant and Tuscola soils in approximately equal 50:50 proportions, again with Brant soils on C slopes, and Tuscola soils on B slopes . (3) To determine the capability of a map unit component, simply combine it with the appropriate slope in Table 10, e.g . BRT1 C indicates that a Brant soil is on a C slope, so the agricultural capability is class 2E ; BRT4 C>B indicates a Brant soil on a C slope with a class 2E capability, and a Tuscola soil on a B slope with a class 2 capability . The agricultural capability of the map unit is 70% class 2E and 30% class 1, e.g. 2E'1 3 . **Approximate capability ratings of poorly drained soils without drainage improvements.
Page 1 and 2:
REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF HALDIMAND=
Page 3 and 4:
INTRODUCTION The soil survey conduc
Page 5 and 6:
1 . Condition of farmland in the Re
Page 7 and 8:
MANITOBA Figure 1. General location
Page 9 and 10: TOWNSHIP OF NORFOLK K,bmel,es 5 0 5
Page 11 and 12: Ô rt-v., s o s ro Waterford Port D
Page 13 and 14: Table 3. Number and size of farms i
Page 15 and 16: mainly bedrock-controlled. Most of
Page 17 and 18: Figure 10 . Schematic landscape cro
Page 19 and 20: i Wattford soils I Figure 15 . Sche
Page 21 and 22: Figure 17. Location of regional wea
Page 23 and 24: Table 8. First field seeding or pla
Page 25 and 26: Mh Well-to moderately well-drained
Page 27 and 28: A vertical section through the expo
Page 29 and 30: Table 9 . Soils mapped in the Haldi
Page 31 and 32: (d) Very poorly drained 1 . Toledo
Page 33 and 34: Landformand Topography Most Berrien
Page 35 and 36: anges from nearly level on the lacu
Page 37 and 38: Parent Materials and Textures Colwo
Page 39 and 40: Figure 30. These Gobles coarse phas
Page 41 and 42: Parent Materials and Textures Kelvi
Page 43 and 44: Soil Moisture Characteristics Maple
Page 45 and 46: Landform and Topography Oakview soi
Page 47 and 48: Figure 37 . Vegetable crops, such a
Page 49 and 50: Styx Soils (SYX) Location and Exten
Page 51 and 52: Parent Materials and Textures Vanes
Page 53 and 54: strong brown to brownishyellow mott
Page 55 and 56: Parent Materials and Textures Wilso
Page 57 and 58: SOIL INTERPRETATIONS FOR AGRICULTUR
Page 59: Table 10. Agricultural land capabil
Page 63 and 64: (5) Table 12 . Agricultural land su
Page 65 and 66: Table 12. Agricultural land suitabi
Page 67 and 68: Table 14 . The relative effectivene
Page 69 and 70: Table 15. K-values, K-ranges and er
Page 71 and 72: Continuedfrom page 66 (c) Slope Gra
Page 73 and 74: Table 18. C-values for continuous a
Page 75 and 76: Table 20. C-values for horticultura
Page 77 and 78: (4) Soil Erosion Assessment Regiona
Page 79 and 80: (b) Site Specific Soil Loss Potenti
Page 81 and 82: Table 24. Estimated susceptibility
Page 83 and 84: v c a> ç C U a PROCEDURE : With ap
Page 85 and 86: Table 27. Description of wind erodi
Page 87 and 88: Table 28. Drainage characteristics
Page 89 and 90: (cm) 0- 20 . 40- 60 80- 100- . 0- 2
Page 91 and 92: Table 31 . Drainage code slope clas
Page 93 and 94: N Table 32. Soil interpretations fo
Page 95 and 96: Table 32 . Soil interpretations for
Page 97 and 98: Table 35. Explanation of terms and
Page 99 and 100: 1 . Ontario Soil Survey. 1928 . Soi
Page 101: O %LLSONBUR6.WV¬COMBE,__ 1 7OWNSHI
show all

Soil Report - Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?