27.03.2013 Views

Chapter 18 Lexical Functions: Description of Lexical Relations in a ...

Chapter 18 Lexical Functions: Description of Lexical Relations in a ...

Chapter 18 Lexical Functions: Description of Lexical Relations in a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

—<strong>Chapter</strong> <strong>18</strong>. <strong>Lexical</strong> <strong>Functions</strong>— 15<br />

A l<strong>in</strong>guistic expression that constitutes an element <strong>of</strong> the value {L´i} <strong>of</strong> an LF f when<br />

applied to L (f(L) = {L´ i }) can be, generally speak<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the five types, that is, L´ can be:<br />

— a lexical unit<br />

1) a lexeme : Magn(smoker) = heavy [smoker]<br />

2) a phraseme (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

collocations) : Magn(smokeV) = [smoke] klike a chimneyl<br />

Magn(ra<strong>in</strong>V) = [ra<strong>in</strong>] kcats and dogsl 4<br />

— a morphological element<br />

3) a compound<strong>in</strong>g stem : Magn(smoker) = cha<strong>in</strong>-[smoker]<br />

4) a derivational affix : S 1(smokeV) = [smok]+er<br />

— a free phrase<br />

5) : Magn(smokeV) = [smoke] more than a battalion <strong>of</strong> firefighters,<br />

without stopp<strong>in</strong>g, light<strong>in</strong>g up a cigarette from<br />

the other, ...<br />

(Cf. Her marriage is as DEAD as the rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> some Wooly Mammoth unearthed by researchers<br />

<strong>in</strong> Siberia, or some such place; the underscored free phrase <strong>in</strong>tensifies the adjective DEAD.)<br />

Now the two relevant def<strong>in</strong>itions can be formulated: <strong>Lexical</strong> <strong>Functions</strong> and Standard<br />

<strong>Lexical</strong> <strong>Functions</strong>.<br />

2.2. Def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lexical</strong> Function<br />

As was already stated, a <strong>Lexical</strong> <strong>Functions</strong> f is a correspondence between lexical expres-<br />

sions (<strong>of</strong> language L) that is associated with a mean<strong>in</strong>g (f) and a (deep-)syntactic role. Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to this characterization, f is applicable or not applicable to LUs <strong>of</strong> particular semantic/<br />

syntactic classes. The notion <strong>of</strong> applicability <strong>of</strong> an LF f to an LU L is based on semantic compati-<br />

bility <strong>of</strong> f and L—that is, on the compatibility <strong>of</strong> the mean<strong>in</strong>gs (f) and (L). Formally, the applicabi-<br />

lity must be explicitly specified for each f by <strong>in</strong>dication <strong>of</strong> the semantic class <strong>of</strong> the correspond-<br />

<strong>in</strong>g LUs—i.e., LUs that can be arguments <strong>of</strong> f. If f is applicable to L, we will say that f is<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ed for L.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!