27.03.2013 Views

Chapter 18 Lexical Functions: Description of Lexical Relations in a ...

Chapter 18 Lexical Functions: Description of Lexical Relations in a ...

Chapter 18 Lexical Functions: Description of Lexical Relations in a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

—<strong>Chapter</strong> <strong>18</strong>. <strong>Lexical</strong> <strong>Functions</strong>— 57<br />

man-Russian). Now the reader has a detailed account <strong>of</strong> support verbs based on Spanish (Alonso<br />

Ramos 2004).<br />

Let us now return to the survey <strong>of</strong> verbal LFs.<br />

46-48. Phasal Verbs<br />

The LFs 46-48 represent the mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> what are <strong>of</strong>ten called phasal verbs:<br />

Incep [Lat. <strong>in</strong>cipere] carries the mean<strong>in</strong>g (beg<strong>in</strong>),<br />

Cont [Lat. cont<strong>in</strong>uāre] means (cont<strong>in</strong>ue),<br />

and F<strong>in</strong> [Lat. f<strong>in</strong>īre] means (cease).<br />

They are semantically full and l<strong>in</strong>ked by obvious semantic relations:<br />

F<strong>in</strong>(P) = Incep(NonP) [(He ceased to sleep) = (He began not to sleep)];<br />

Cont(P) = NonF<strong>in</strong>(P) = NonIncep(NonP) [(He cont<strong>in</strong>ues to sleep) = (He does not cease to sleep)].<br />

Once aga<strong>in</strong>, one can easily see the reason for a tripartite organization <strong>of</strong> these LFs (the <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

Incep plus two possible negative ‘derivations’).<br />

The three phasal LFs are applicable to verbs or verbal expressions only. Therefore, to apply<br />

one <strong>of</strong> them to a noun, even a predicate noun, a support verb is needed: (beg<strong>in</strong> negotiations) must<br />

be written as IncepOper 1 (negotiations), etc.; as a result, they are most <strong>of</strong>ten used <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>a-<br />

tion with other LFs, i.e. <strong>in</strong> complex LFs, see below, 3.1, p. 00. A phasal verb takes L as its<br />

DSyntA II: Incep−II→L, etc.<br />

Examples<br />

IncepOper 1(fireN [shoot]) = open [~ on NY]<br />

IncepOper 2(power) = fall [under the ~→<strong>of</strong> NX]<br />

F<strong>in</strong>Oper 1(power) = lose [one’s ~→over NY]<br />

ContOper 1(power) = reta<strong>in</strong> [one’s ~→over NY]<br />

[The expression ‘~→NP’ <strong>in</strong> the reduced Government Pattern means that the NP <strong>in</strong> question<br />

syntactically depends on the key lexeme L and not on the support verb.]<br />

ContFunc 0(<strong>of</strong>fer) = stands<br />

ContFunc 0(smellN) = l<strong>in</strong>gers [Loc<strong>in</strong> N], l<strong>in</strong>gers on [here, we see an obligatory circumstan-<br />

tial (locative or temporal), which is by no means a DSyntA <strong>of</strong> SMELL]<br />

However, <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, these LFs can be used as well outside <strong>of</strong> complex LFs, i.e., directly<br />

with verbal keywords, if the language allows for this: Rus. Incep(goret´ (burn [<strong>in</strong>trans.])) =<br />

//za+goret´+sja, Incep(plakat´ (cry)) = //za+plakat´, Incep(spat´ (sleep)) = //za+snut´,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!