Chapter 18 Lexical Functions: Description of Lexical Relations in a ...
Chapter 18 Lexical Functions: Description of Lexical Relations in a ...
Chapter 18 Lexical Functions: Description of Lexical Relations in a ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
—<strong>Chapter</strong> <strong>18</strong>. <strong>Lexical</strong> <strong>Functions</strong>— 63<br />
The two follow<strong>in</strong>g LFs—Prox and Prepar—have no actantial structure <strong>of</strong> their own and<br />
therefore with a nom<strong>in</strong>al L they appear only with LFs <strong>of</strong> the type Oper i or Real i, i.e., they are<br />
always used <strong>in</strong> complex LFs; with a verbal L they can appear alone. Their keyword L is a noun or<br />
a verb with an predicate mean<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
57. Prox [Lat. proximāre (approach)] = proximative<br />
Examples<br />
Prox is a verb mean<strong>in</strong>g (be about to …) ≈ (be on the verge <strong>of</strong> …).<br />
Prox(die) = //be cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g to life, be fight<strong>in</strong>g for life<br />
ProxOper 1(despair) = be on the edge [<strong>of</strong> ~]<br />
ProxOper 1(disaster) = head [for ~] < be on the br<strong>in</strong>k [<strong>of</strong> ~]<br />
ProxOper 1(tears) = be on the verge [<strong>of</strong> ~]<br />
ProxFunc 0(storm) = brews, gathers<br />
58. Prepar [Lat. praeparāre] = preparative<br />
Prepar is a verb mean<strong>in</strong>g (prepare N for ...) ≈ (get N ready for normal use or function<strong>in</strong>g);<br />
Prepar1 is used to express the idea <strong>of</strong> (prepare oneself for ...).<br />
Examples<br />
PreparFact 0(car) = fill up [ART ~]<br />
PreparFact 0(ears) = prick up [ART ~s]<br />
PreparFact 2(program) = load [ART ~ <strong>in</strong>to a computer]<br />
PreparFact 2(ambush) = set [ART ~ for NY]<br />
Prepar 1Real 1(ambush) = lay [<strong>in</strong> ~ for NY]<br />
Prepar 1Real 2(plane) = board [ART ~]<br />
Remark<br />
Prepar and Prox stand <strong>in</strong> an obvious semantic relation:<br />
Prepar(Y) ≈ consciously CausProx(Y).<br />
That is, Prepar implies teleological, purposeful activity; that is why it was decided to keep it as a<br />
separate LF.