27.03.2013 Views

Chapter 18 Lexical Functions: Description of Lexical Relations in a ...

Chapter 18 Lexical Functions: Description of Lexical Relations in a ...

Chapter 18 Lexical Functions: Description of Lexical Relations in a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

—<strong>Chapter</strong> <strong>18</strong>. <strong>Lexical</strong> <strong>Functions</strong>— 88<br />

assurance maladie lit. (illness <strong>in</strong>surance) = (medical <strong>in</strong>surance) and assurance vie (life <strong>in</strong>surance)<br />

are collocations: <strong>in</strong> the first case you <strong>in</strong>sure aga<strong>in</strong>st illness, <strong>in</strong> the second case you <strong>in</strong>sure your<br />

life. (Other cases <strong>of</strong> the same type are assurance <strong>in</strong>cendie lit. (fire <strong>in</strong>surance) vs. assurance<br />

logement lit. (apartment <strong>in</strong>surance).) Or else Fr. auto-école vs. driv<strong>in</strong>g school; or Fr. [un]<br />

condamné à vie lit. (condemned to life) = (person condemned to life <strong>in</strong> prison) vs. [un] condamné à<br />

mort lit. (condemned to death); cf. life sentence vs. death sentence. In all these collocations the<br />

problem is created by a semantic actant expressed idiosyncratically (it is shown <strong>in</strong> boldface). The<br />

technique used <strong>in</strong> MTT to describe such phenomena is to use the Government Pattern, <strong>in</strong> which<br />

all such idiosyncrasies are explicitly stated. Thus, the collocations <strong>of</strong> this type are covered by<br />

GPs rather than by LFs. (See <strong>Chapter</strong> 17, 5, p. 00ff.)<br />

6.3 <strong>Lexical</strong> <strong>Functions</strong> <strong>in</strong> L<strong>in</strong>guistic Representations<br />

As far as the participation <strong>of</strong> LFs <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic representations is concerned, the standard and the<br />

non-standard LFs are treated differently.<br />

The standard LFs are considered to be Deep <strong>Lexical</strong> Units; therefore, they appear <strong>in</strong> the<br />

DSynt-Structure <strong>of</strong> the sentence under process<strong>in</strong>g. Thus, dur<strong>in</strong>g synthesis, the standard LF f is<br />

selected based on its semantic source <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itial SemS. For <strong>in</strong>stance, for the expression high<br />

temperature <strong>of</strong> the liquid we have the correspondence (16):<br />

(16) (temperature )<br />

(liquid)<br />

1 2<br />

1<br />

(!)<br />

(very)<br />

TEMPERATURE<br />

"<br />

I<br />

LIQUID<br />

SemS DSyntS<br />

ATTR<br />

Magn<br />

The LF Magn is computed accord<strong>in</strong>g to LF-Sem-Rule 2, see above, 5.1.5. (The adjective HIGH is<br />

computed later—at the SSynt-level as an element <strong>of</strong> the value Magn(temperature); it is taken from<br />

the lexical entry <strong>of</strong> TEMPERATURE and <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong>to the SSyntS <strong>of</strong> the sentence.)<br />

The non-standard LFs are not Deep <strong>Lexical</strong> Units and they do not appear <strong>in</strong> any<br />

representation. They are simply used <strong>in</strong> the lexicon to ensure the correct lexical choice <strong>in</strong> the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> synthesis. For <strong>in</strong>stance, for the expression leap year we have the correspondence (17):

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!