29.03.2013 Views

Layout 3 - India Foundation for the Arts - IFA

Layout 3 - India Foundation for the Arts - IFA

Layout 3 - India Foundation for the Arts - IFA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Myth Retold – Romila Thapar<br />

A myth grows through additions and changes. So we<br />

have to ask what <strong>the</strong> trajectory was of <strong>the</strong> Valmiki<br />

Ramayana at various times in <strong>India</strong>n history.<br />

myth and why. I would argue that<br />

<strong>the</strong>se texts do not claim historicity but<br />

reflect a historical consciousness, a<br />

consciousness that what <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

narrating may have happened in <strong>the</strong><br />

past. This would suggest that we<br />

investigate not <strong>the</strong> historicity of events<br />

narrated in <strong>the</strong> texts, but how <strong>the</strong><br />

consciousness of <strong>the</strong> past itself has<br />

been captured and given <strong>for</strong>m through<br />

<strong>the</strong> narrative. To me this seems to be<br />

<strong>the</strong> way in which one has to analyse<br />

what, <strong>for</strong> example, is being said in<br />

Valmiki’s Ramayana. A myth grows<br />

through additions and changes. So we<br />

have to ask what <strong>the</strong> trajectory was of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Valmiki Ramayana at various<br />

times in <strong>India</strong>n history. Why did this<br />

particular story, articulated in this<br />

particular <strong>for</strong>m, capture popular<br />

imagination? When and why was it<br />

converted into a sacred text <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Vaishnava Bhagavata sect by<br />

representing Rama as an avatara of<br />

Vishnu?<br />

Passing reference is made to what<br />

seems to have been an oral rama-katha,<br />

which was converted into a written<br />

kavya by Valmiki possibly during <strong>the</strong><br />

fourth or third century BC, and <strong>the</strong>n<br />

this was added to in <strong>the</strong> later periods.<br />

The Valmiki Ramayana became a<br />

hegemonic text from <strong>the</strong> late first<br />

millennium AD. It consists of seven<br />

books, and most Ramayana scholars<br />

accept that <strong>the</strong> first and <strong>the</strong> last book,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Bala-kanda and <strong>the</strong> Uttara-kanda,<br />

were later additions. It is in <strong>the</strong>se<br />

additions that <strong>the</strong> emphasis is on Rama<br />

being an avatara. So when one talks<br />

about <strong>the</strong> original Valmiki Ramayana<br />

one is referring to books Two to Six.<br />

Current scholarship assumes that <strong>the</strong><br />

Ramayana that Valmiki composed, and<br />

which was added to, was written over a<br />

period that stretched from 400 BC to<br />

400 AD.<br />

This chronological span of 800 years<br />

would include <strong>the</strong> two variants that I<br />

wish to discuss: <strong>the</strong> Buddhist version<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Rama story, a very short version<br />

known as <strong>the</strong> Dasaratha Jataka put<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r in possibly <strong>the</strong> second<br />

century BC; and <strong>the</strong> first of many<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!