29.03.2013 Views

Layout 3 - India Foundation for the Arts - IFA

Layout 3 - India Foundation for the Arts - IFA

Layout 3 - India Foundation for the Arts - IFA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Epic Culture – Ashis Nandy<br />

I suspect that both [Gandhi and Tagore] recognised<br />

that it was in <strong>the</strong> shared spirituality of medieval <strong>India</strong><br />

that <strong>the</strong> real clues to <strong>India</strong>’s unity and uniqueness lay<br />

strewn.<br />

ritual excesses and pagan practices.<br />

For Tagore to give so much<br />

importance to <strong>the</strong> domain of<br />

consciousness defined by <strong>the</strong> Bhakti<br />

and Sufi movements—albeit led by<br />

great mystics and creative minds like<br />

Nanak, Kabir and Lalan—must have<br />

been both a radical departure and a<br />

<strong>for</strong>m of self-defiance. More so<br />

because, though <strong>the</strong> domain did not<br />

exclusively belong to any particular<br />

region, language or religion, it looked<br />

like a cauldron of diversity that<br />

paradoxically celebrated ano<strong>the</strong>r kind<br />

of social unity—one that lacked a<br />

politically usable centre of gravity.<br />

This was also, more or less, <strong>the</strong><br />

position of <strong>the</strong> official fa<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong><br />

nation Mohandas Karamchand<br />

Gandhi. Understandably so, <strong>for</strong> while<br />

Gandhi belonged to <strong>the</strong> Bhakti<br />

tradition, his mo<strong>the</strong>r belonged to <strong>the</strong><br />

Pranami or Parnami sect, which at<br />

least one scholar, Dominique Khan,<br />

has recently called a lost sect of Shia<br />

Islam. (All this has become<br />

controversial today and <strong>the</strong> Parnamis,<br />

I am told, have become more secretive<br />

about <strong>the</strong>ir sacred text because it<br />

includes long extracts from <strong>the</strong> Koran.<br />

Their temples were earlier<br />

architecturally Indo-Islamic, a mix of<br />

temple and mosque. Some might even<br />

identify <strong>the</strong>m as instances of Indo-<br />

Saracenic architecture. Now, after <strong>the</strong><br />

experiences of <strong>the</strong> community during<br />

Partition—<strong>the</strong> Parnamis were victims<br />

of a major massacre at Bhawalpur in<br />

West Punjab—<strong>the</strong>y build with a<br />

vengeance temples that replicate <strong>the</strong><br />

look of what <strong>the</strong>y believe is a proper,<br />

standardised, Hindu temple.)<br />

Why did both <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> nation<br />

and <strong>the</strong> national poet think this way? I<br />

suspect that both recognised that it<br />

was in <strong>the</strong> shared spirituality of<br />

medieval <strong>India</strong> that <strong>the</strong><br />

real clues to <strong>India</strong>’s unity<br />

and uniqueness lay<br />

strewn. And this<br />

spirituality, in turn, was<br />

primarily defined by <strong>the</strong><br />

priority given to <strong>the</strong> major<br />

<strong>India</strong>n epics, particularly<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!