29.03.2013 Views

Layout 3 - India Foundation for the Arts - IFA

Layout 3 - India Foundation for the Arts - IFA

Layout 3 - India Foundation for the Arts - IFA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ravana. So Ravana is a human, not a<br />

rakshasa; he is a Meghavahana<br />

belonging to <strong>the</strong> Vidyadhara lineage.<br />

The lesser line is <strong>the</strong> Vanaravamsha,<br />

who are humans and not monkeys,<br />

and are settled in Kishkindha.<br />

There are, in <strong>the</strong> Paumachariya, a<br />

series of what one might call<br />

rationalisations of Valmiki’s fantasies.<br />

To give you a couple of examples, <strong>the</strong><br />

Vanaras were not monkeys but<br />

humans who carried a monkey<br />

emblem; <strong>the</strong> monkey was <strong>the</strong>ir totem.<br />

Vimala Suri tells us that Ravana was<br />

not ten-headed but had a superb<br />

necklace of nine large gemstones,<br />

beautifully polished, and each gem<br />

reflected his head. There<strong>for</strong>e he was<br />

called Dashagriva. He is also called<br />

Akashamargi because he has access to<br />

an aerial chariot, which is, of course,<br />

<strong>the</strong> pushpakavimana in which he<br />

kidnaps Sita in <strong>the</strong> Valmiki version.<br />

The exile of Rama, in this version, is<br />

through <strong>the</strong> Vindhya <strong>for</strong>ests. Vimala<br />

Suri is writing in <strong>the</strong> early centuries<br />

AD, when much of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>for</strong>ested<br />

Myth Retold – Romila Thapar<br />

areas were being cleared and cultivated<br />

which allowed <strong>the</strong> establishing of<br />

kingdoms.<br />

We should give serious attention to<br />

<strong>the</strong> variants because <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong><br />

articulation of those who have a<br />

different version of <strong>the</strong> story and we<br />

have to ask ourselves why <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

<strong>the</strong>se differences. They were not just<br />

casual changes made to <strong>the</strong> narrative<br />

but statements incorporating diverse<br />

views over <strong>the</strong> representation of <strong>the</strong><br />

past. There is bound to be some<br />

seepage between <strong>the</strong> earlier and <strong>the</strong><br />

later texts, and from one version to<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r. This seepage introduces a<br />

different perspective. And I think that<br />

<strong>the</strong> Paumachariya is doing precisely<br />

that: introducing an alternative<br />

perspective.<br />

Historically <strong>the</strong>se are not of course <strong>the</strong><br />

only variants. The essential human<br />

sensitivities that <strong>the</strong> story touches has<br />

resulted in multiple variants all over<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>India</strong>n sub-continent and beyond<br />

to south-east Asia. In each case <strong>the</strong><br />

We should give serious attention to <strong>the</strong> variants<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong> articulation of those who have a<br />

different version of <strong>the</strong> story.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!