02.04.2013 Views

The Biographies of Rechungpa: The Evolution of a Tibetan ...

The Biographies of Rechungpa: The Evolution of a Tibetan ...

The Biographies of Rechungpa: The Evolution of a Tibetan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> biographies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rechungpa</strong> 126<br />

and Songs <strong>of</strong> Shepay Dorje encounters the wish-fulfilling cow, is said to be Tipupa’s<br />

paternal uncle, that is, Ghayadhara’s [sic] brother. Amoghavajra is said to be<br />

Tipupa’s maternal uncle and Līlāvajra (sGegs-pa’i rDo-rje), a prolific author from earlier<br />

in the century, is said to be his paternal grandfather. This may, however, all be a later<br />

accretion <strong>of</strong> family to enhance Tipupa’s standing.<br />

Pema Karpo, though relying on Tsangnyön Heruka and Götsang Repa, appears to balk<br />

at associating Tipupa with the pigeon story. He states that Darma Dodé died <strong>of</strong> a riding<br />

accident in his twenty-first year, and that Marpa told him to fly to east India, where he<br />

should enter a young brahmin’s corpse. Pema Karpo then tersely adds, ‘Nothing more<br />

was subsequently heard <strong>of</strong> him.’ 102<br />

When he comes to describe Tipupa, Pema Karpo repeats only Götsang Repa’s<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> Ghayadhara as his father. Pema Karpo identifies Tipupa himself<br />

as Candrabhadra (not to be confused with Candragarbha, who encounters the<br />

wish-fulfilling cow), but with no intimation as to where this name came from.<br />

<strong>The</strong> accounts <strong>of</strong> Tipupa being a child towards the end <strong>of</strong> the life <strong>of</strong> Nāropa (who died<br />

1040) imply that he would be in his forties when Ma Lotsawa (rMa Lo-tsā-ba) was in<br />

India. <strong>Rechungpa</strong>’s pupilage under Tipupa must have taken place no later than the first<br />

two decades <strong>of</strong> the twelfth century, when Tipupa would have been in his seventies and<br />

eighties. According to <strong>The</strong> Lhorong Dharma History, <strong>Rechungpa</strong> came to India in AD<br />

1110, when he would have reached the age <strong>of</strong> 26 and Milarepa was 70. If this is correct,<br />

Tipupa would have been in his mid-seventies at least when <strong>Rechungpa</strong> studied under<br />

him.<br />

Ma Lotsawa’s (rMa Lo-tsā-ba) stay in India took place before his adoption <strong>of</strong> the 16year<br />

old Machik Shama (Ma-gcig Zha-ma), who was Khönpuwa’s (Khon-pu-ba) sister,<br />

as a consort in 1085. This accords with Tipupa being famous in the 1080s, 103 being a<br />

pupil <strong>of</strong> Maitripa (born 983/6–1063 or 995/8–1075), 104 and living long enough to be<br />

<strong>Rechungpa</strong>’s teacher in the beginning <strong>of</strong> the eleventh century.<br />

After visiting Tipupa, <strong>Rechungpa</strong> returns to (Ta-ba-sa-ta) and<br />

Varacandra sends him back to Tibet. A new detail here is that he first receives<br />

instructions (on ) from a guru named Miti Khyungsho (rMi-rti Khyungshog),<br />

a name composed perhaps <strong>of</strong> a corruption <strong>of</strong> conjoined with the <strong>Tibetan</strong> for<br />

which is itself a corruption <strong>of</strong> supplement’ (khyung-shams).<br />

<strong>Rechungpa</strong> receives from him the instructions for ‘swift feet’ (rkang-mgyogs) one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

legendary eight siddhis, and after a month <strong>of</strong> meditation gains the power <strong>of</strong> being able to<br />

travel swiftly, so that he makes it back to Milarepa, on foot, in seven days.<br />

Before meeting Milarepa, <strong>Rechungpa</strong> receives Mahāmudrā and other teachings from<br />

three masters, and Dzogchen (rDzogs-chen) teachings from a Nyingma master, none <strong>of</strong><br />

whom are attested to elsewhere. Dzogchen is described as ‘the view that there are no<br />

deities or demons’. This simplistic and misleading definition is in fact just setting<br />

Dzogchen up for a blow that will be delivered against it further on in the text, during his<br />

principal journey to India. This is a residue <strong>of</strong> an antipathy to Dzogchen that is found in<br />

early Kagyu material such as Gyadangpa. <strong>The</strong> earliest example is in Gampopa’s<br />

biography <strong>of</strong> Milarepa, in which (unlike later versions in which this passage is toned<br />

down) Milarepa’s Dzogchen teacher confesses that these teachings are useless and he<br />

himself has gained no benefit from them. 105 Nevertheless, it would be wrong to conclude

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!