03.04.2013 Views

The Song of Solomon : and the Lamentations of Jeremiah

The Song of Solomon : and the Lamentations of Jeremiah

The Song of Solomon : and the Lamentations of Jeremiah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE LAMENTATIONS OF JEREMIAH<br />

apparently it passed into current language, <strong>and</strong> so was<br />

adopted by St. John in <strong>the</strong> Apocalypse.^ At first Satan<br />

is <strong>the</strong> adversary <strong>and</strong> accuser <strong>of</strong> man, as in Job - <strong>and</strong><br />

Zechariah;^ <strong>the</strong>n he is recognised as <strong>the</strong> tempter, in<br />

Chronicles, for example.* But in no case is he said<br />

to be <strong>the</strong> primary cause <strong>of</strong> evil. No plummet can<br />

sound <strong>the</strong> depths <strong>of</strong> that dark pit in which lurks <strong>the</strong><br />

source <strong>of</strong> sin.<br />

Meanwhile a very different problem, <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>of</strong><br />

suffering, is answered by attributing this form <strong>of</strong> evil<br />

quite unreservedly <strong>and</strong> even emphatically to God. It is<br />

to be remembered that our Lord, accepting <strong>the</strong> language<br />

<strong>of</strong> His contemporaries, ascribes this to Satan, speaking<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> woman afflicted with a spirit <strong>of</strong> infirmity as one<br />

whom Satan had bound ; ^ <strong>and</strong> that similarly St. Paul<br />

writes <strong>of</strong> his thorn in <strong>the</strong> tlesh as a messenger <strong>of</strong><br />

Satan," to whom he also assigns <strong>the</strong> hindrance <strong>of</strong> a<br />

projected journey.'' But in <strong>the</strong>se cases it is not in <strong>the</strong><br />

least degree suggested that <strong>the</strong> evil spirit is an irre-<br />

sistible <strong>and</strong> irresponsible being. <strong>The</strong> language only<br />

points to his immediate agency. <strong>The</strong> absolute supremacy<br />

<strong>of</strong> God is never called in question. <strong>The</strong>re is no real<br />

concession to Persian dualism anywhere in <strong>the</strong> Bible.<br />

In difficult cases <strong>the</strong> sacred writers seem more anxious<br />

to uphold <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> God than to justify His<br />

actions. <strong>The</strong>y are perfectly convinced that those actions<br />

are all just <strong>and</strong> right, <strong>and</strong> not to be called in question,<br />

<strong>and</strong> so <strong>the</strong>y are quite fearless in attributing to His<br />

direct comm<strong>and</strong>s occurrences that we should perhaps<br />

think more satisfactorily accounted for in some o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

' Rev. xii. 9.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!