You can download this volume here - Electric Scotland

2O Rev. James Wilson
A perfect
bounder.
Eleckett.
6.
For
Warrwick.
Rotele
menconed in
the
interrogatory.
taken into their possession agayne, where he thinketh the same
are as yett remayninge. And further saith, that emongst w ch
sealed writyngs
The mill
John Bleckett.
a perfect bounder betwene the Kinges
majestyes landes and the plaintiffes manner of Dalston appeared
playne, and how much is encroched their upon the Kinge.
And that the myll now claymed as Dalston myll standeth upon
the Kinges land and nott upon any parte of the manner of
Dalston. And saith that he, this examynate, hath nott any of
the evidences, notes or writynges in his custodye, nor knoweth
who hath the same.
To the [fifth] interrogatory] he saith that the John Bleckett,
in the interrogatory named, came to this examynate to
Cardewe, to entreat him to derect the sd Bleckett what
thing was fyttyng for him to begg in lease of his lord the
Bushope of Carlyle. And this examinate moved him to
gett a
tythe in lease about Carlyle. And did aske him withall
whether he did knowe such a booke as is menconed in this
interrogatorye. And moved him to entreat a sight of that
book, because that this examynate did think that did conserne
j^t
his estate, in this, viz., whether the mannor of Cardewe, in the
parishe of Dalstoun, was reported in the coppie of the Kinges
grant menconed in that book mayd to the said sea of Carlele, to
be parcell of the mannor of Dalstoune, yea or no. And the
said Bleckett told this examynate that those bookes were in his
maysters custodye. Wherupon this examynate resorted to the
records about London, and fyndyng their the said charter upon
record, their appeared nott in the same any report of the
mannor of Cardewe nor of any landes within the same did
belong to the sea of Carlyle. And that from the Kinges
records this examynate hath his information and that the landes
in question is held of the Kinge & nott of the plaintiff nor of
the sea of
Carlyle.
To the [sixth] interrogatory] he saith that he doth nott
remember that the said Warrick did shewe to this examynate
to the
any evidences that this examynate knoweth to belong
sea of Carlyll. Butt this examynate did advise the said p[ar]son
Warrwick & afterward the said plaintiff him selfe, and was a
meane that the plaintiff attayned dyvers evidences w ch belonged
to the said sea from the handes of John May, sonn to the late
John Maye, Bushope of Carlile, amongst w h was that Rowle in
parchment in the said interrogatory menscond, w ch never came
to this examjnates handes sythenc the same was delivered to the
said plaintiff. And that the copies w h he tooke was notes to lead
him, this examynate, to the records them selfs about London,
which when he had found to be agreable to his evydenc, this
examynate no further estemed of the said notes, butt disposed
them to other uses as he thinketh was lawfull for him to do.
And some copies he hath from the said records remaynyng in