NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mr Stephen Faulkner Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford Society Thetford 24 Policy TH 34 Agree Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford 24 Policy TH 34 Agree Mr Thomas Goucher Croxton 24 Policy TH 34 Comment Mrs Janet Smith Gibbons Thetford 24 Policy TH 34 Comment This section is clearer than previous drafts & significantly more comprehensive. There still remains no reference to surface water (pluvial) flood risk & is dependent on the catchment-based flood risk assessments undertaken thus far. Initial work on the Norfolk Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment (PFRA) indicates the potential need for a surface water management plan (SWMP) to be undertaken for the Thetford/Attleborough area & this should inform current and future flood risk vulnerabilities arising from surface water. Locally specific SUDS guidance will be developed by NCC over the forthcoming months, in conjunction with the LPAs & this will enable developers to identify & design in, at the outset, the most appropriate method of site drainage & surface water management regime. The long term viability of a fresh water supply is essential. Studies must be conducted to ensure the supply is sustainable before development commences. Agree. The long term viability of a fresh water supply is essential. Studies must be conducted to ensure the supply is sustainable before development commences With Thetford being in one of the driest regions of the Country and suffering periods of very low rainfall most years, how can you be sure of providing sufficient water? Mrs Patricia Poel Thetford 24 Policy TH 34 Agree But how do you limit litres per person per day? Velda Luckhurst Thetford 24 Policy TH 34 Comment Mr Ed Chambers Norfolk County Council Norwich A recent talk to a local group by an employee of Anglian Water expressed concerns about the ability of the supply and disposal of Water cycle studies have been completed. Please go to the water in this area to cope for much longer, even with the existing LDF pages of www.breckland.gov.uk. Anglia Water Services population. A large increase in the population from the proposed new and Environment Agency involved in steering such studies and houses would put further strain on this already creaking network. are consultees on the TAAP and planning applications. Support noted. There are many types of water saving devices that can be installed in a dwelling. No further action. Wherever you put all the houses, the infra structure has got to be right from the start - no silly add ons because someone forgot to think in the first place. You will probably need a new water treatment and sewage plant on the site - another reason to move the whole Water cycle studies have been completed. Please go to the build away from Thetford. The town is blessed with its water supply LDF pages of www.breckland.gov.uk. Anglia Water Services but the underground river system and too many bore holes could and Environment Agency involved in steering such studies and with an ever increasing population undermine it. are consultees on the TAAP and planning applications. Improve section on Waste Water Treatment Works. Thetford Town Council Norfolk 24 Policy TH 35 Agree Approved Support noted. No further action. Mr Paul Leeming Carter Jonas Harrogate 24 Policy TH 35 Agree Policy TH35 Development in Flood Zones is appropriate for the consideration for development in the proximity to the Thet and Little Ouse Rivers, in particular proposals for the regeneration of the town centre. Support noted. No further action. Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford Society Thetford 24 Policy TH 35 Agree Support noted. No further action. Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford 24 Policy TH 35 Agree Support noted. No further action. Mrs Patricia Poel Thetford 24 Policy TH 35 Agree So no academy near waterside. Noted. No further action. Velda Luckhurst Thetford 24 Policy TH 35 Comment 24 Policy TH 34 Comment Early application of appropriate SUDS is an essential component of the Master-Planning stages of development. Further, under the Flood & Water Management Act 2010, development proposals will need to be informed by the Local Strategic Flood Risk Management Strategy undertaken by the lead local flood authority. Preparatory work for this is underway by NCC Comments noted. Commented on old version of the TAAP. After further discussions with NCC Officers, section has been updated to reflect support for Breckland wide Surface Water Management Plans with other additions in the TAAP on drainage and surface water. No further action. The flood planes have already been encroached upon - no further development should even be considered anywhere near what's left of Some types of development are acceptable in flood plains, but the flood plain. must meet various tests as per the sequential test in PPS25. No further action.
The WW2 pillbox at the entrance to Blakeney Farm should be protected during any development. It is part of the modern history of the area and is almost certainly a roosting place for various bat Such a structure is a local heritage asset and a such will be Mr Simon Malone Thetford 25 25.05 Comment species included in the existing buildings policy TH5. No further action. Mr Ed Chambers Thetford Town Council Norfolk 25 Policy TH 36 Agree Welcomed Support noted. No further action. For Section 25 Archaeology we remain concerned that the TAAP Gallows Hill is in an area of significant change and has dual Mr Paul Leeming Carter Jonas Harrogate 25 Policy TH 36 Comment does not provide a consistent context for the cultural heritage issues of biodiversity and archaeology. SMs are taken into No further action. Mr Stephen Faulkner Norfolk County Council Norwich 25 Policy TH 36 Agree Welcome policies TH.36 and TH.37. Support noted. No further action. Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford Society Thetford 25 Policy TH 36 Agree Support noted. No further action. Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford 25 Policy TH 36 Agree Support noted. No further action. Mr Tom Gilbert- Wooldridge English Heritage Cambridge 25 Policy TH 36 Agree We support Policy TH36 and its approach in defining an area of principal archaeological interest. The Thetford Historic Environment Survey is a key piece of evidence and helps to provide clarity on the areas of archaeological interest within the town. The policy sets out clear criteria on how archaeology should be dealt with in the main area and ensures that sites of the highest archaeological interest, including scheduled monuments, will be preserved. We also support the boundary of the main area as shown in Map 25.1, which includes all of the town centre scheduled monuments, most of the town centre areas of national archaeological significance (as shown in the Thetford Historic Environment Survey) and much of the conservation area. Support noted. No further action. Mrs Patricia Poel Thetford 25 Policy TH 36 Comment Recorded and published. Supporting text refers to this. No further action. Mr Ed Chambers Mr Stephen Faulkner Thetford Town Council Norfolk 25 Policy TH 37 Agree Welcomed Support noted. No further action. It is worth noting that the heritage assets in the town are being investigated/improved in a variety of ways, not just through the TAAP: • Gallows Hill is in an area of significant change and has dual issues of biodiversity and archaeology and as such has its own policy. • The Existing Buildings in the Urban Extension are to be retained as undesignated heritage assets of local historic interest. • There is a policy approach to bringing the Listed Buildings at the Railway Station into re-use. • SMs are taken into consideration in the TAAP as a constraint/something to take account of in some areas (e.g. Bury Rd/Brandon Rd junction and approach to the Bridge street car park site). For Section 25 Archaeology we remain concerned that the TAAP does not provide a consistent context for the cultural heritage • TH36 and 37 reflects specific evidence provided by NCC resource of Thetford. At the one extreme there is a specific policy for Environmental Services. the Gallows Hill a Schedule Monument but limited regard for other • Some listed buildings are being looked at through other such designated sites within the town. There is reference to the channels, for example the Cosy Carpets Building will be central historical area Policy TH36 Area of Main Archaeological improved through the Bus Interchange work and work has been Interest and general reference within Policy TH37 Investigation completed to structurally secure St Mary the Less. Moving Required in Other Locations of Archaeological Interest. However, Thetford Forward has allocated funding for a grant scheme for there appears limited reference to either the Town Centre buildings in the town centre. Conservation Area or the Listed buildings within it and elsewhere in • Various policies have heritage assets and settings and SMs Mr Paul Leeming Carter Jonas Harrogate 25 Policy TH 37 Comment the town mentioned in the text, e.g. when planting trees. No further action. Norfolk County Council Norwich 25 Policy TH 37 Agree Welcome policies TH.36 and TH.37. Support noted. No further action. Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford Society Thetford 25 Policy TH 37 Agree Support noted. No further action. Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford 25 Policy TH 37 Agree Support noted. No further action.
Page 1 and 2:
Full Name Company / Organisation Po
Page 3 and 4:
Mr Tom Gilbert- Wooldridge English
Page 5 and 6:
Mr Simon Malone Thetford 4 4.21 Com
Page 7 and 8:
Ian Poole St Edmundsbury Borough Co
Page 9 and 10:
Mrs Jenny Gladstone Norfolk Geodive
Page 11 and 12:
Tony Poulter Brettenham and Kilvers
Page 13 and 14:
Mr Paul Leeming Carter Jonas Harrog
Page 15 and 16:
Mr. neil Thetford healthy blackshaw
Page 17 and 18:
Mr A M Cox Thetford 11 Map 11.1 Com
Page 19 and 20:
Mr Anthony Poulter Mr Ed Chambers B
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford Society T
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Charlotte Poel Thetford 13 Policy T
Page 29 and 30:
C A Brooks Thetford 13 Policy TH 11
Page 31 and 32:
Chisman Gary Highways Agency Bedfor
Page 33 and 34:
Chisman Gary Highways Agency Bedfor
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Velda Luckhurst Thetford 13 Policy
Page 39 and 40:
E Friend Thetford 13 Policy TH 8 Ag
Page 41 and 42:
Katie Benford Planning Potential Lt
Page 43 and 44:
P Dunnett 19 Admirals Way Thetford
Page 45 and 46:
Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford 14 Policy
Page 47 and 48:
Katie Benford Katie Benford Plannin
Page 49 and 50:
Mr Anthony Poulter Mr Stephen Faulk
Page 51 and 52:
Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford 16 Policy
Page 53 and 54:
Mr Stephen Faulkner Mr Stephen Faul
Page 55 and 56: Mr P Dunnett Thetford 16 Policy TH
Page 57 and 58: Mr. neil blackshaw Thetford healthy
Page 59 and 60: Mr Tom Gilbert- Wooldridge English
Page 61 and 62: Melinda Raker By email 18 Policy TH
Page 63 and 64: Mr John Kitson Thetford 18 Policy T
Page 65 and 66: Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford 18 Policy
Page 67 and 68: Mr Tom Gilbert- Wooldridge English
Page 69 and 70: Mrs L Brightman Thetford 18 Policy
Page 71 and 72: Val Moore By email 18 Policy TH 21
Page 73 and 74: S Lenane Thetford Mr Anthony Lewis
Page 75 and 76: Mr Ed Chambers Thetford Town Counci
Page 77 and 78: Mr Paul Leeming Carter Jonas Harrog
Page 79 and 80: E Friend Thetford 19 Policy TH 25 D
Page 81 and 82: Mr and Mrs Baker Mr and Mrs M Moor
Page 83 and 84: Mr E Leeder Thetford 19 Policy TH 2
Page 85 and 86: Mr P King Thetford 19 Policy TH 25
Page 87 and 88: Mrs E McGuire Thetford 19 Policy TH
Page 89 and 90: Mrs L Holmes Thetford 19 Policy TH
Page 91 and 92: S Lenane Thetford 19 Policy TH 25 D
Page 93 and 94: Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford 19 Policy
Page 95 and 96: Mr Paul Leeming Carter Jonas Harrog
Page 97 and 98: D Tricker D Tricker D Tricker D Tri
Page 99 and 100: Chisman Gary Highways Agency Bedfor
Page 101 and 102: This is another vague and wishy was
Page 103 and 104: Mrs K Turner Thetford 22 Policy TH
Page 105: Melinda Raker By email 24 Policy TH
Page 109 and 110: Mr. neil blackshaw Mr. neil blacksh
Page 111 and 112: Mr. g Brighton Thetford 29 Policy T
Page 113 and 114: P Dunnett 19 Admirals Way Thetford
Page 115 and 116: Mr Stephen Faulkner Mr Neil Stott N
Page 117: Tony Poulter Brettenham and Kilvers
show all

NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?