04.04.2013 Views

NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly

NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly

NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford 19 Policy TH 26 Agree<br />

Mr Tim Lovejoy By email 19 Policy TH 26 Comment<br />

Mr Tom Gilbert-<br />

Wooldridge English Heritage Cambridge 19 Policy TH 26 Agree<br />

Mrs Jodie<br />

Canham Thetford 19 Policy TH 26 Comment<br />

Mrs L Brightman Thetford 19 Policy TH 26 Comment<br />

Mrs Lynn Nicholls Thetford 19 Policy TH 26 Comment<br />

Agree, but question how points one and three can be achieved BDC wants to see an increased use of the station and whilst<br />

without taking allotment land, commercial land or carrying out a other forms of transport will be encouraged, cars could still be<br />

major restructuring of the surrounding roads. The obvious car used. It is recognised only available areas for parking are<br />

parking area, which was redundant commercial land, is now being commercial land or allotments, but BDC would ensure<br />

built on and Station Road, the main artery into the Town Centre from compensatory provision for allotments or helping existing<br />

the Station, has its own traffic flow problems.<br />

businesses relocate to an employment area.<br />

Improve reference to allotment land<br />

and land swap.<br />

With regards to TH26, may I strongly suggest that part of improving<br />

access to and at the station to include Station Road. Station Road is<br />

just too narrow for parking on one side and two way traffic as well. If Station Road included within detailed policy. Disagree re<br />

you were to narrow the pavements on one side slightly, this would be reducing width of footway as modal shift to more sustainable<br />

possible and change the road flow completely.<br />

modes of transport, including walking is essential for the town. No further action.<br />

We welcome the recognition given to the listed buildings and<br />

structures at the railway station and the need to promote appropriate<br />

conservation and repair. Support noted. No further action.<br />

The existing railway to be polished up to include cafes/tourist<br />

information like Wymondham. Noted. The policy approach enables such provision. No further action.<br />

Railway station car park should be expanded into the area where the<br />

tyre retail area had been, although, I believe, this is earmarked for<br />

housing, this is too near the railway line.<br />

BDC wants to see an increased use of the station and whilst<br />

other forms of transport will be encouraged, cars could still be<br />

used. It is recognised only available areas for parking are<br />

commercial land or allotments, but BDC would ensure<br />

compensatory provision for allotments or helping existing<br />

businesses relocate to an employment area.<br />

Improve reference to allotment land<br />

and land swap.<br />

Update the railway station - more car parking is needed - what about<br />

approaching the nearby church who have a very large car park? Nearby church approached but not keen. No further action.<br />

Mrs Patricia Poel Thetford 19 Policy TH 26 Comment Sounds an impossibility. Noted. No further action.<br />

Mrs Sarah<br />

Wilson Thetford 19 Policy TH 26 Comment<br />

I agree with increasing parking space at the station - but where? The<br />

obvious site for this, right next to the station, which could have been<br />

bought, is now being built on. I certainly support re-use of the<br />

attractive railway buildings - if it's to improve facilities at the station<br />

itself. ‘Continue improving access to....the station' - I would question<br />

the use of the word ‘continue'. I haven't seen any improvement.<br />

BDC wants to see an increased use of the station and whilst<br />

other forms of transport will be encouraged, cars could still be<br />

used. It is recognised only available areas for parking are<br />

commercial land or allotments, but BDC would ensure<br />

compensatory provision for allotments or helping existing<br />

businesses relocate to an employment area.<br />

N. D. Winser Thetford 19 Policy TH 26 Agree Don't forget disabled access to both platforms! Noted. This is included in the detailed policy already. No further action.<br />

S Lenane Thetford 19 Policy TH 26 Comment<br />

T Friend Thetford 19 Policy TH 26 Comment<br />

Mr Simon Malone Thetford 20 20.01 Comment<br />

Mr Anthony<br />

Poulter<br />

Brettenham and<br />

Kilverstone Parish<br />

Council Thetford 20 20.14 Comment<br />

Any improvement to the station would be welcome, but why are you<br />

allowing house to be built on the best place to increase parking?<br />

Typical Breckland foresight.<br />

Money would be better spent building a modern station facility with<br />

adequate parking and access to both sides of the platforms for less<br />

abled passengers unless two stations are going to have regular<br />

services.<br />

Do not waste money on a new doctor's surgery within the proposed<br />

planned development. The Healthy Living Centre, only a few years<br />

old, is centrally located for the overall layout of the new conurbation<br />

and to my mind appears to be functioning well below its expected<br />

capacity. At the same time one of the town's existing surgeries is<br />

currently being expanded anyway<br />

Linda Payne Thetford 20 Policy TH 27 Disagree how is health anything to do with town planning, irrelevant<br />

BDC wants to see an increased use of the station and whilst<br />

other forms of transport will be encouraged, cars could still be<br />

used. It is recognised only available areas for parking are<br />

commercial land or allotments, but BDC would ensure<br />

compensatory provision for allotments or helping existing<br />

businesses relocate to an employment area.<br />

Improve reference to allotment land<br />

and land swap.<br />

Improve reference to allotment land<br />

and land swap.<br />

Comment noted. Improved access between the platforms at the<br />

existing station is a well understood need and expressed in the<br />

policy. The buildings are listed. This station is in the central<br />

area of the town, so its existence will be maintained. No further action.<br />

The Healthy Living Centre will remain, but reviewed to see how<br />

its offer could be improved to benefit the public. There is GP<br />

surgery capacity in the town for the short to medium term, but<br />

dentist provision needs improving in the short term, according to<br />

evidence provided by NHS Norfolk. No further action.<br />

would be more appropriate under the primary care policy TH 18. If<br />

the fire and ambulance facilities are ok then why have a policy to say<br />

so. Will the additional employment and homes not require an Agree re placement in document. Based on advice from fire and<br />

increase in fire and ambulance services?<br />

ambulance. Statement shows that issues has been looked at.<br />

Review where health, police and<br />

other emergency services best fit in<br />

the document.<br />

Disagree. Mounting evidence about the effect of town planning<br />

on health and the ability of residents to move more. No further action.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!