NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Mr Robert King Mr Ed Chambers There is already a perceived view of "Them and Us" among Thetford residents which has been increasingly voiced at a number of public meetings and presentations. The development as proposed will only exacerbate this perception. Acknowledge this section needs to be revisited reaffirming that the TAAP vision is about integrated development for the whole regeneration benefit. Improve this section. Croxton Parish Council Thetford Town Thetford 16 16.45 Comment Council THETFORD 16 Policy TH 15 Agree Approved Support noted. No further action. Mr Paul Leeming Carter Jonas Harrogate 16 Policy TH 15 Comment Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford 16 Policy TH 15 Comment Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford Society Thetford 16 Policy TH 15 Comment Policy TH15 Energy and Carbon -Thetford Urban Extension and Policy TH16 Decentralised Energy Supply appear to duplicate policies TH32 and TH33 which are TAAP wide. It is considered that these could be combined and simplified. It would be appropriate for the contents of Table 16.1 (and the justification at 16.13) to provide some flexibility to suggest "compliance with the national standard appropriate at the time of determination", in relation to the on-going a review of the Building Regulations and the Code for Sustainable Homes. Agree to some extent. These should be the maximum rather than the minimum national standards. New homes should comply with the Energy Performance Certificate ‘A' or, at least, ‘B' ratings. These should be the maximum rather than the minimum national standards. New homes should comply with the Energy Performance Certificate ‘A' or, at least, ‘B' ratings. There is no local evidence for the TAAP to require houses to be built better than the building regulations in terms of energy. Note that as time goes by, the building regulations will become tighter in terms of energy efficiency. TAAP addresses water consumption. Commercial buildings are covered by the In light of the recent budget/The Plan for Growth (http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/ukecon_growth_inde x.htm) revisit relevant policies. Refresh energy and carbon sections. TH15 and TH32A removed. TH16 changed to refer to connecting to decentralised energy supply. TH32 a changed to emphasise importance of FEES. BREEAM policy. No further action. There is no local evidence for the TAAP to require houses to be built better than the building regulations in terms of energy. Note that as time goes by, the building regulations will become tighter in terms of energy efficiency. TAAP addresses water consumption. Commercial buildings are covered by the BREEAM policy. No further action. Mrs Patricia Poel Thetford 16 Policy TH 15 Comment And will it? Noted. No further action. We have commented in previous iterations of the TAAP on the need to ensure that any renewable energy infrastructure is sensitively sited and uses environmentally responsible fuel sources. Such proposals have the potential to make a net contribution to greenhouse gas emissions if poor choices are made for fuels, or if materials are sourced from long distances. Equally such proposals have the potential to promote inappropriate crops in the Breckland area which might reduce its capacity to support vulnerable protected species such as stone-curlew. Mike Jones Comments noted. Core Strategy Policies CP12 and DC15 cover RSPB RSPB Thetford Town Norwich 16 Policy TH 16 Comment renewable energy production. Mr Ed Chambers Council Norfolk 16 Policy TH 16 Agree Approved Support noted. No further action. Mr Ivor Andrew Croxton 16 Policy TH 16 Comment Mr Paul Leeming Carter Jonas Harrogate 16 Policy TH 16 Comment Cross refer to CP12 and DC15 at end of supporting text. Heat and power can only be achieved by developing a plant near to The TAAP does not plan for a power station specifically. The development could however provide a heat load for a CHP. It is (within 2Km) or within development. No such development for power correct that transfer of heat up to 2km is feasible and difficult and heat has been designated in the TAAP. beyond that distance. No further action. Policy TH15 Energy and Carbon -Thetford Urban Extension and Policy TH16 Decentralised Energy Supply appear to duplicate policies TH32 and TH33 which are TAAP wide. It is considered that these could be combined and simplified. It would be appropriate for the contents of Table 16.1 (and the justification at 16.13) to provide some flexibility to suggest "compliance with the national standard appropriate at the time of determination", in relation to the on-going a review of the Building Regulations and the Code for Sustainable Homes. Agree to some extent. In light of the recent budget/The Plan for Growth (http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/ukecon_growth_inde x.htm) revisit relevant policies. Refresh energy and carbon sections. TH15 and TH32A removed. TH16 changed to refer to connecting to decentralised energy supply. TH32 a changed to emphasise importance of FEES.
Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford 16 Policy TH 16 Comment Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford Society Thetford 16 Policy TH 16 Comment Mrs Patricia Poel Thetford 16 Policy TH 16 Comment Castle Thetford 16 Policy TH 17 Comment Ian Poole St Edmundsbury Borough Council Bury St Edmunds 16 Policy TH 17 Comment Lois Yates Croxton 16 Policy TH 17 Comment Lois Yates 16 The Street Croxton. 16 Policy TH 17 Comment The local planning authority should insist that any new buildings comply with the most exacting standards available. The ‘Community Heat and Power Plant' sounds feasible but not if the Power Plant is the one that is proposed in the countryside north of the A11 alongside the Mundford Road (ref. TH2 ). The local planning authority should insist that any new buildings comply with the most exacting standards available. The ‘Community Heat and Power Plant' sounds feasible but not if the Power Plant is the one that is proposed in the countryside north of the A11 alongside the Mundford Road (ref. TH2 ). More information required about renewable technologies on every property. There is no local evidence for the TAAP to require houses to be built better than the building regulations in terms of energy. Note that as time goes by, the building regulations will become tighter in terms of energy efficiency. TAAP addresses water consumption. Commercial buildings are covered by the BREEAM policy. The power station referred to is subject to the usual planning application process. No further action. There is no local evidence for the TAAP to require houses to be built better than the building regulations in terms of energy. Note that as time goes by, the building regulations will become tighter in terms of energy efficiency. TAAP addresses water consumption. Commercial buildings are covered by the BREEAM policy. The power station referred to is subject to the usual planning application process. No further action. The building regulations will become tighter as time goes by in terms of energy efficiency. The Core Strategy also has policy DC14 which requires developments of 10 properties or more to provide 10% of their energy from renewables - how this is done depends on each scheme. No further action. The existing Breckland Council Offices can be used as an educational establishment - no not take our riverside away from us. Riverside area unlikely to be needed for education. No further action. St Edmundsbury Borough Council is aware that West Suffolk College in Bury St Edmunds provides further and higher education opportunities for Thetford, including providing limited facilities in the town itself. However, given the level of growth proposed for Thetford, the Council is concerned that there will be considerable demand for courses at the Bury St Edmunds Campus. This is likely to create additional trips on the A134 between Thetford and Bury St Edmunds at peak times and increase congestion in villages and at key junctions, including the junction between the A134 and the A14 at Bury St Edmunds. The Borough Council can find no evidence, in the AAP or supporting studies, of proposed measures to address the wider impact of this growth. It is considered that the Thetford Transport Study (December 2008) is not sufficiently strategic enough and does not have regard to the potential impact of such levels of growth on the wider sub-region. These shops, which will be fairly large, along with close proximity to Tesco, will detract new residents from coming into the existing town centre. With all these facilities in the Urban Extension, it amounts to a new town. Why will these new residents need to come into Thetford? I note that on the 2008 I and O consultation, 67% of responses asked for the schools to stay where they are! Are resident's views really taken into consideration? Will the N and S Academy buildings be demolished for yet more housing? Late representation. Comments noted. Education provision is being improved in Thetford through the Academy, which involves the colleges in the area. Public transport review would include bus provision to Bury St Edmunds. There is an updated transport study completed in 2010. Late representation. Comments noted. Walking and Cycling routes will be improved and so will buses. Town centre will also be regenerated. Education approach is that the academy will all be in one place, to north preferred and only real deliverable option. No further action. The academy has set itself up over two sites, as a response to operational issues, there are benefits for location on a single site. Current thinking is to direct secondary education to the north of the town. Plans for the former Charles Burrell have not been considered yet. Pass on comments to NCC.
Page 1 and 2: Full Name Company / Organisation Po
Page 3 and 4: Mr Tom Gilbert- Wooldridge English
Page 5 and 6: Mr Simon Malone Thetford 4 4.21 Com
Page 7 and 8: Ian Poole St Edmundsbury Borough Co
Page 9 and 10: Mrs Jenny Gladstone Norfolk Geodive
Page 11 and 12: Tony Poulter Brettenham and Kilvers
Page 13 and 14: Mr Paul Leeming Carter Jonas Harrog
Page 15 and 16: Mr. neil Thetford healthy blackshaw
Page 17 and 18: Mr A M Cox Thetford 11 Map 11.1 Com
Page 19 and 20: Mr Anthony Poulter Mr Ed Chambers B
Page 23 and 24: Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford Society T
Page 27 and 28: Charlotte Poel Thetford 13 Policy T
Page 29 and 30: C A Brooks Thetford 13 Policy TH 11
Page 31 and 32: Chisman Gary Highways Agency Bedfor
Page 37 and 38: Velda Luckhurst Thetford 13 Policy
Page 39 and 40: E Friend Thetford 13 Policy TH 8 Ag
Page 41 and 42: Katie Benford Planning Potential Lt
Page 43 and 44: P Dunnett 19 Admirals Way Thetford
Page 45 and 46: Mr Stuart Wilson Thetford 14 Policy
Page 47 and 48: Katie Benford Katie Benford Plannin
Page 49: Mr Anthony Poulter Mr Stephen Faulk
Page 53 and 54: Mr Stephen Faulkner Mr Stephen Faul
Page 55 and 56: Mr P Dunnett Thetford 16 Policy TH
Page 57 and 58: Mr. neil blackshaw Thetford healthy
Page 61 and 62: Melinda Raker By email 18 Policy TH
Page 63 and 64: Mr John Kitson Thetford 18 Policy T
Page 69 and 70: Mrs L Brightman Thetford 18 Policy
Page 71 and 72: Val Moore By email 18 Policy TH 21
Page 73 and 74: S Lenane Thetford Mr Anthony Lewis
Page 75 and 76: Mr Ed Chambers Thetford Town Counci
Page 79 and 80: E Friend Thetford 19 Policy TH 25 D
Page 81 and 82: Mr and Mrs Baker Mr and Mrs M Moor
Page 83 and 84: Mr E Leeder Thetford 19 Policy TH 2
Page 85 and 86: Mr P King Thetford 19 Policy TH 25
Page 87 and 88: Mrs E McGuire Thetford 19 Policy TH
Page 89 and 90: Mrs L Holmes Thetford 19 Policy TH
Page 91 and 92: S Lenane Thetford 19 Policy TH 25 D
Page 97 and 98: D Tricker D Tricker D Tricker D Tri
Page 101 and 102:
This is another vague and wishy was
Page 103 and 104:
Mrs K Turner Thetford 22 Policy TH
Page 105 and 106:
Melinda Raker By email 24 Policy TH
Page 107 and 108:
The WW2 pillbox at the entrance to
Page 109 and 110:
Mr. neil blackshaw Mr. neil blacksh
Page 111 and 112:
Mr. g Brighton Thetford 29 Policy T
Page 113 and 114:
P Dunnett 19 Admirals Way Thetford
Page 115 and 116:
Mr Stephen Faulkner Mr Neil Stott N
Page 117:
Tony Poulter Brettenham and Kilvers
show all

NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?