04.04.2013 Views

NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly

NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly

NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

D Tricker<br />

D Tricker<br />

D Tricker<br />

D Tricker<br />

Norwich Road<br />

Estate Residents<br />

Association Thetford 21 Policy TH 29 Comment<br />

Norwich Road<br />

Estate Residents<br />

Association Thetford 21 Policy TH 29 Comment<br />

Norwich Road<br />

Estate Residents<br />

Association Thetford 21 Policy TH 29 Comment<br />

Norwich Road<br />

Estate Residents<br />

Association Thetford 21 Policy TH 29 Comment<br />

Bryant mapped the whole of Norfolk from an ‘Actual Survey' carried<br />

out in 1824, 1825 and 1826 at a scale of 1:51,742 or 10 miles to 12¼<br />

inches which compares well with the more modern OS Landranger<br />

maps of 1:50,000. Bryant's map therefore pre dates the first<br />

published Ordnance Survey maps of Norfolk' which did not appear<br />

until 1836-7. An earlier one inch to one mile map of Norfolk produced<br />

by Faden, may also show the Lane. However a copy of this particular<br />

map has not as yet been studied. The lane continues to be shown on<br />

successive OS maps into the 2O1 and 21st centuries. The OS map<br />

ofl9Ol shows the lane crossing over the railway line by means of a<br />

bridge although by the time of the OS Popular Edition (1920 22) the<br />

bridge must have been replaced as the railway is shown passing<br />

over the lane as it still does today. This latter map is more detailed<br />

and also shows the Cedar Row tree shelter belt. Whilst the Lane has<br />

at times probably been used as a farm track its importance as a<br />

walkway is indicated by its appearance on early maps such as that<br />

produced by Bryant. Noted.<br />

It is also likely that the boundaries of the lane were hedged, as they<br />

still are, although such detail is often regarded as minor and thus not<br />

shown on maps, as is often the case today. Hedgerow Protection It is<br />

of great importance that the hedgerows alongside Joe Blunts Lane<br />

are retained & preserved as a green barrier between existing and<br />

proposed developments, to ensure both environmental and social<br />

needs. Various means are available to achieve the preservation of<br />

hedgerows e.g.. designation as an ancient hedge; the Hedgerow<br />

Regulations 1997 or Important Hedge status. Precise dating of<br />

hedgerows is difficult unless they are actually marked on maps or<br />

documents from times past. It has been proposed that hedges can<br />

be dated by counting the number of species in a 27 metre section of<br />

hedge Noted.<br />

. In its simplest form each separate species would suggest an age of<br />

100 years. This method however may well be better described as an<br />

indicator of the age of a hedge. Such a survey of the hedges along<br />

Joe Blunt's Lane may therefore able to give some indication of<br />

support for the belief that the hedges could pre date the enclosure of<br />

lands under Acts passed between 1740 and 1850. The existence of<br />

the lane in 1826 has already been established although it's actual<br />

origins are obviously even older. Whilst the Hedgerow Regulations of<br />

1997 (now within the remit of defra) may preclude one (or possibly<br />

both) of those alongside Joe Blunt's Lane on the grounds that<br />

‘hedges forming a boundary between agricultural and residential land<br />

are not specifically included', they contain much valuable information<br />

and advice on issues eg. Environmental Impact Assessments, that<br />

can be used to support the retention and preservation of the hedges<br />

along the lane. Noted.<br />

As to the consultation on the development of Thetford RE Jo Blunts<br />

lane Thetford I have been instructed by the committee of the Norwich<br />

Road Residents Association to make the following points<br />

regardingJo Blunts Lane 1 The lane should retain its rural feel<br />

2There should be a minimum green space between the development<br />

and Jo Blunts Lane of at least lOm - 20 m not to include the hedge,<br />

Private gardens, Road Ways 3 The surface of the lane be Braden<br />

gravel, not Tarmac, 4 No lights are required 5 All trees and hedges<br />

be preserved, (this is a wild life haven) 6 The lane be taken over by<br />

the local authority 7 Houses adjacent to the lane be facing it, as on<br />

the Norwich Road Estate, and served by pathways, services from<br />

behind Please look at the Norwich Road Estate where it abuts Jo<br />

Blunts Lane, and take that as a model. 8 Please don't repeat the<br />

mistakes by building right up to the edge, as was made at Green<br />

Lane , where the lane was ruined.<br />

The proposed masterplan shows that for the most part, the land<br />

use of the north side of the route will be formal and semi-natural<br />

parkland. The trees and hedges along its route will be protected<br />

by TH2 - locally distinctive features of the landscape. Adoption<br />

is a subject for PPA but there is potential for NCC to adopt and<br />

maintain.<br />

Include some aspects in reasoned<br />

justification.<br />

Include some aspects in reasoned<br />

justification.<br />

Include some aspects in reasoned<br />

justification.<br />

Include reference to 'rural feel',<br />

'appropriate surfacing' to policy. Add<br />

in appropriate place that dwellings<br />

should face Joe Blunt's Lane to<br />

mirror the existing development<br />

close by, Add that encroachment<br />

onto the lane will not be accepted.<br />

Add that lighting should be<br />

appropriate and energy efficient if<br />

needed. Add adoption to PPA<br />

issues to be discussed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!