NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly
NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly
NOT TO BE PRINTED_Draft Final TAAP comments duly
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Mrs E McGuire Thetford 19 Policy TH 25 Disagree<br />
Mrs Janet Smith<br />
Gibbons Thetford<br />
19<br />
Policy TH 25 Disagree<br />
Mrs Janet Smith<br />
Gibbons<br />
Mrs Jodie<br />
Thetford 19 Policy TH 25 Disagree<br />
Canham Thetford 19 Policy TH 25 Agree I agree to move bus station.<br />
and existing riverside site is urgently<br />
The design of the new Bus Interchange and the work planned for required in advance of Town Centre<br />
Minstergate and St Nicholas Street (including the adjacent masterplan work to aid local<br />
junction onto Norwich Road) are "sensible" and will be safe for understanding of what is being<br />
Abandon this project on bus station at St Nicholas Street. scheme to pedestrians and other road users. The proposals being proposed and why an alternative<br />
build forum on old Anchor Hotel site has been abandoned. Please, developed have been subject to an independent safety audit and option of retaining the existing bus<br />
please convert this site to new bus station with toilets, rest room, two full scale 'mock up' trails carried out with a local bus operator facility is not an appropriate way<br />
tourist centre. This is an attractive site to encourage visitors to the recommendations of which have been incorporated into the forward to achieve the regeneration<br />
Thetford.<br />
design as it has developed.<br />
of this key town centre site.<br />
The proposed site for the new bus station is completely wrong on<br />
many counts. Local residents know this and have made their<br />
objections clear over the past months. The approach road is totally<br />
unsuitable; it is narrow and always full of pedestrians (and according<br />
to TH21, priority will be given to pedestrians in Minstergate). What<br />
will happen when the Burrell Museum has an open day with its steam<br />
engines outside, or moving slowly along the road into town? Will the<br />
museum no longer be able to move the steam engines outside? The<br />
Burrell Museum is a popular tourist attraction. Restricting its<br />
operation conflicts with the concept ‘Gateways into Thetford' which<br />
plans to highlight Thetford's heritage. I understand that the proposed<br />
new site will not accommodate the new, larger buses (one of the<br />
reasons given for having to move from the original site is that the<br />
current site can't take these buses).<br />
The desire for the existing bus facilities that exist within the<br />
Bridge Street car park to be improved is noted. However the<br />
existing site is constrained, by adjacent buildings (one of which<br />
is listed), flood zones (along the river frontage) and by the<br />
existence of a scheduled ancient monument. Without significant<br />
demolition of buildings the existing facilities can not be improved<br />
to provide a high quality interchange of sufficient capacity to<br />
cater for the planned growth and regeneration of the town. If<br />
building demolitions occurred to achieve a suitable site assembly<br />
a new bus interchange the regeneration potential of this<br />
important town centre site and the opportunity it provides to<br />
significantly enhance the river frontage and wider revival of the<br />
town centre would be compromised.<br />
The design of the new Bus Interchange and the work planned for<br />
Minstergate and St Nicholas Street (including the adjacent<br />
junction onto Norwich Road) are "sensible" and will be safe for<br />
pedestrians and other road users. The proposals being<br />
developed have been subject to an independent safety audit and<br />
two full scale 'mock up' trails carried out with a local bus operator<br />
the recommendations of which have been incorporated into the<br />
design as it has developed.<br />
There is insufficient parking (for the many people who currently drive<br />
to the bus station and leave their car for the day whilst using their<br />
bus passes for a day out. The site will not be large enough to<br />
accommodate the number of buses currently using the bus station<br />
(at peak times (eg 8.30 am) sometimes 5 or 6 at a time). There<br />
appears to be no provision for facilities such as toilets, waiting room -<br />
the lack of which has been given as another reason the current bus<br />
station is unsuitable. The traffic flow on the inner relief road will<br />
cause long delays for buses, especially at peak times - it often takes<br />
three or four changes of the traffic lights to move from the St<br />
Nicholas street junction to the Bury Road/Brandon Road/London<br />
Road junction. The riverside setting is a wonderful welcome to<br />
travellers coming to or passing through Thetford. The current bus<br />
station could easily be improved by purchasing the vacant land This appears an extension of another comment; a response for<br />
behind the Chinese restaurant to widen the exit.<br />
which is given above.<br />
Agree that further consultation on<br />
the new proposed bus interchange<br />
and existing riverside site is urgently<br />
required in advance of Town Centre<br />
masterplan work to aid local<br />
understanding of what is being<br />
proposed and why an alternative<br />
option of retaining the existing bus<br />
facility is not an appropriate way<br />
forward to achieve the regeneration<br />
of this key town centre site.<br />
Support for moving the bus station from its existing location is<br />
noted. No further action.<br />
The desire for the existing bus facilities that exist within the<br />
Bridge Street car park to be improved is noted. However the<br />
existing site is constrained, by adjacent buildings (one of which<br />
is listed), flood zones (along the river frontage) and by the<br />
existence of a scheduled ancient monument. Without significant<br />
demolition of buildings the existing facilities can not be improved<br />
to provide a high quality interchange of sufficient capacity to<br />
cater for the planned growth and regeneration of the town. If<br />
building demolitions occurred to achieve a suitable site assembly<br />
for a new bus interchange the regeneration potential of this<br />
important town centre site and the opportunity it provides to<br />
significantly enhance the river frontage and wider revival of the<br />
town centre would be compromised.<br />
Agree that further consultation on<br />
the new proposed bus interchange<br />
and existing riverside site is urgently