04.04.2013 Views

Mireille Consalvey PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mireille Consalvey PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

Mireille Consalvey PhD Thesis - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dicl varijtion, ý in microphytobcwhic<br />

hi<strong>of</strong>ijmý<br />

This study addressed depth changes in PPFD with no quantification <strong>of</strong> the<br />

spectral variation. Direct measures <strong>of</strong> spectral scalar irradiance have been shown<br />

to significantly differ from incident irradiance in microphytobenthic bi<strong>of</strong>ilms<br />

(KUhl and Jorgensen 1994) and therefore future studies should account for this<br />

variation. The absorption characters <strong>of</strong> the diatom and euglenoid bi<strong>of</strong>ilms will<br />

differ according to the pigment suite <strong>of</strong> the respective groups. Future work<br />

should examine these changes and relate to changes in the surface taxa over time<br />

(e. g. the switch from diatoms to Euglenoid cells with increasing PPFD).<br />

6.4.5. Do modelled rates <strong>of</strong> primary productivity correlate with actual rates <strong>of</strong><br />

primary productivity?<br />

Microphytobenthic primary productivity showed a diel pattem<br />

for both<br />

Arlesford Creek and the Hythe, with a morning maxima in productivity declining<br />

over the afternoon with a brief increase before nightfall. There was no evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> a tidal rhythm on any <strong>of</strong> the days. These patterns did not reflect changes in<br />

biomass or diel changes in PPFD. However, the rates <strong>of</strong> productivity were at<br />

least an order <strong>of</strong> magnitude higher in July to March, possibly reflecting ambient<br />

light conditions. Furthermore, day 2 in 1999 had comparable PPFDs to 2000 and<br />

biomass was comparable between years and therefore not the reason for the<br />

lower rates <strong>of</strong> productivity in March. When primary productivity was modelled,<br />

the patterns largely corresponded to short term changes in ambient light. This is<br />

logical considering the general lack <strong>of</strong> variation in chlorophyll a and a and P,,,,<br />

(Perkins pers. comm). Therefore, the model is biased towards light and due care<br />

must be taken in modelling primary production/productivity rates. The die]<br />

pattems obtained using 14<br />

C make sense ecologically. Cells have no way <strong>of</strong><br />

186

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!